×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Active vs Passive sound attenuation

Active vs Passive sound attenuation

Active vs Passive sound attenuation

(OP)
I'm intrigued by a quote website selling ear protection -earplugs.
 
"Noise isolation (34-36 dB) far surpasses that of active noise-canceling earphones"
http://www.etymotic.com/ephp/er6.aspx

Surely that claim is impossible.
At the very least it could be classed as misleading if they're comparing their product with a very specific type of active noise reducer at a restricted frequency range.

Interested in any comments.

Tony

RE: Active vs Passive sound attenuation

My experience with cheap on-ear (as opposed to around-ear) antinoise headphones is that you'd be lucky to see -20 dB (which is fine in context).

I don't think their claims are ridiculous. Performance of passive earplugs is well documented, why do you have a problem with those (very poorly defined) claims?

eg

http://annhyg.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/46/6/527

etc.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Active vs Passive sound attenuation

(OP)
I guess I took issue with the claim only because it was so poorly defined that in my view it could be misunderstood. If they had specified 'on ear', then their claim would be valid in the way you describe, but at the same time would be a somewhat inappropriate comparison since the main benefit of the active component of active headphones is to attenuate lower frequencies, which passive protection doesn't achieve very well.

It kinda caught my interest. I agree it isn't so bad.
Thanks for your thoughts on the subject.

Tony


RE: Active vs Passive sound attenuation

Well I'd be much happier if they gave a TL plot against frequency, rather than just posting the peak value.

Of course this raises the problem of bone conduction etc.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Active vs Passive sound attenuation

Maybe they just tested a sample of the available noise-cancelling headphones - which seem to focus their efforts more on being music players - and found their passive devices have "noise isolation (34-36 dB) far surpasses that of active noise-canceling earphones."

Which in my experience should be easy enough to do.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources