×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ASME B31.3 Para. 345.2.3(c) Closure Welds

ASME B31.3 Para. 345.2.3(c) Closure Welds

ASME B31.3 Para. 345.2.3(c) Closure Welds

(OP)
According to B31.3 Para. 345.2.3(c) for closure welds, this may be done as long as all components have been leak tested successfully, undergo in-process examination as per Para. 344.7, and pass either 100% RT or 100% UT examination. This becomes a problem when the final closure weld is a socket-weld. Has anyone been able to develope and qualify either a UT or RT procedure that will satisfy the requirements for closure welds when they're a socket weld configuration? We've submitted test pieces, consisting of 1" sch. 80 pipe into 3000# SW ell's, to a few NDE companies, with level 3's, asking if they can develope a procedure for either RT or UT and so far none have been able to do so. Anyone else have any better luck?

RE: ASME B31.3 Para. 345.2.3(c) Closure Welds

Hi AEF,
I’ve been in your situation several times with socket closure welds and have taken this stance:  
I performed the in-process examination and used MT on each layer of weld metal inleu of using either UT or RT.

As you’ve discovered the limitations of UT and RT pertaining to socket welds, I suggest to you that while the requirements of 345.2.3(c) are basic design principles, the Code is not a design handbook by it’s own admission.  I further suggest that the use of MT as I’ve stated in this scenario, constitutes competent engineering judgment and assures uniform application of the Code’s safety and quality principles.

I believe now as then, this is a commonsensical approach to this specific problem and would have no problem enacting it again under like circumstances.
Good luck to you.

RE: ASME B31.3 Para. 345.2.3(c) Closure Welds

Oops, I forgot to mention in the previous post (clicking too quick) an additional reason to use MT or PT.  Please take a look at the acceptance criteria table 341.3.2 and check out the fillet weld imperfections listed.  Notice which ones are NA's and which ones are detectable using MT or PT.

RE: ASME B31.3 Para. 345.2.3(c) Closure Welds

I have been in the same situation many times and have found that with client acceptance (which has never been a problem) I have performed PT on each pass. One at the "root" and one on the final pass. We have settled many issues that way. I have found that this is the best procedure to satisfy the code. RT and MT supply minimal results on this type of joint. Hope this helps.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources