×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Using relaying CT's for measuring loads.

Using relaying CT's for measuring loads.

Using relaying CT's for measuring loads.

(OP)
What it the typical accuracy of relaying CT's at typical load values of 0.1 to 1.0?   I am asking because I just tried to add up the MW & MVAR at one our buses with c400 & c800 CT's feeding panel meters. The net MVA at the bus was about 7% of the total flowing through all the lines.   What suprised me was variation in the total for each phase was much less than the unbalanced currents between the phases. I guess it is really two questions.

1. For a set of identical CT's, will they normally read the same value within say, 1%.
2. In comparing two different sets of relaying CT's, how much error should I expect?

I know IEEE C57.13 defines worst case accuracy as +/-10% between 1.0 and 20 times full load, but it doesn't address less than 1.0 PU loading, nor would it address typical nominal values.

Thanks



RE: Using relaying CT's for measuring loads.

At normal load current I'd expect a C400 CTs accuracy to be better than 1% at a reasonable burden, at least in terms of ratio error.  I just looked in an old Flex-core catalog and they have 600 V toroidal CTs that are C400, 1200:5 with a metering accuracy of 0.3 at B1.8.    

High voltage bushing CTs may not be quite as good as that.  

Maybe Scottf will be along to enlighten us both.  

RE: Using relaying CT's for measuring loads.

C800 and C400 CTs should be very accurate at rated current...at a minimum in the 0.3B1.8 range. At 10% Irated, I would expect them to normally be around 0.6%.

However, they aren't tested at those levels for metering accuracies.

The above is assuming the full winding is being used. If one of the taps is being used then it will be worse and potentially much worse, depending on the construction of the CT (i.e. if each winding segment is equally distributed around the core).

In general, you shouldn't see too much variation between like CTs of the same vintage and manufacturer. If they're different types of CTs, then you may see some noticeable difference, but I would think within .5% at rated current. Unless you're using taps, then all bets are off.

RE: Using relaying CT's for measuring loads.

(OP)
Thanks  Scott. At the particular substation I measured, we used taps on all of the CT's. That is pretty interesting that they could affect accuracy that much.

RE: Using relaying CT's for measuring loads.

Tapping down a multi-ratio relaying CT also impacts the relaying accuracy.  A C400 1200/5 CT tapped for 600/5 effectively becomes a C200 CT.  

RE: Using relaying CT's for measuring loads.

bacon4life-

For a given core size, the fewer the secondary turns, the worse the accuracy.

The example dbc gives is valid for CTs with equally distributed secondary windings, meaning each winding segment is equally distributed around the core. This is not a requirement of the standard and can't be assumed to be true unless specified that way. With that said, most manufactures try to supply distributed windings when possible, i.e. if it doesn't add too much cost.

RE: Using relaying CT's for measuring loads.

What you're talking about doing, using relaying CT's for measurement, is a common practice.  The fact that most of the new generation of microprocessor-based relays include comprehensive metering functions is testament to the reliability of this means of obtaining signals.

I wouldn't get too concerned unless my end user was pursuing the mythological "revenue accuracy".

old field guy

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources