×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve
2

SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

(OP)
Does anyone know of any information that can help me 'retrain' myself. I've used SolidWorks (03 thru 07) and find myself at a new company that uses SE(V19) So far, I've found it extremely frustrating to change to a new software. I've used SW, Mech Desk, and Inventor without problems, but SE seems to just work completely different. I'm looking for a 'translator' or something that could help me learn SE better (and faster!)

Before anyone asks: No, the company is not going to switch software and no, I can't find anything about User Groups closer than 3 states away (I'm in NC)

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

At a previous employer we had people come from Solid Works and learn Solid edge without much trouble but this was a few years ago (2000-2003) in the UK.

At my current place (created by merging several other companies) one of the merged companies used SW and some users still complain.

I don't know about a tranlator but "I get it" has online traiing for SE, we're trying it out on some interns I don't know how much better it is than just the SE tutorials.

If nothing else, have a go at the relevant tutorials.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

They aren't that much different but I know how frustrating it can be - I went the from SE to SW for 6 months and it drove me mad.
I would say generally in SW you create a plane, then your sketch profile and then decide what you are going to do with them.
In SE it's the other way round - you decide what feature you want and then select the plane to generate the profiles for it, which are then absorbed into the feature itself.
However, with SE you do get a choice. If you feel more comfortable you can create a plane, put a sketch on it and then generate the feature. These will then be shown as seperate elements in the feature tree. Experienced users will not usually work this way.

Follow Kenat's advice and do the tutorials. This will at least show you the basic procedures.

bc

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

bc,
[...]
If you feel more comfortable you can create a plane, put a sketch on it and then generate the feature. These will then be shown as seperate elements in the feature tree. Experienced users will not usually work this way.
[...]
sure they will it has some advantage. You can combine some
otherwise seperate sketches into one to make your design
intent a bit clearer and then create the features out of
it. Sure, the sketch must not be 'overloaded' and as usual:
it depends on the task at hand.

dy

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

Hi Don,
I was thinking on the lines of simple protrusions, cuts and revolves.
More complex features WILL require seperate creation of planes and sketches and that's a method I always use myself for sweeps and lofts.
As you say, it depends on the task in hand - and that's what I like about SE - you have the choice.
I was trying to point out one of the different ways that SE works compared to SW - hopefully I haven't confused Gstoner !!

I think it's just a matter of practice, and eventually you work out your own preferred methods, as I did when I switched to Solid Works.

bc

ps. Happy New Year to everyone.

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

be lucky that you can learn so many different softwares...
For me the SE tutorials did the job.

johan

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

2
Gstoner, I feel your pain. Several years ago I had a side job which involved using SE (evenings and weekends) for a couple of months. I also found it extremely frustrating. The learning curve for me was made steeper due to using SW daily in my regular job.

The tutorials definitely helped. Being patient, keeping an open mind and being willing to learn are the main things which  will help you. Having a friendly mentor at the new company would also be a big asset. Just don't p!$$ him off by complaining about SE. wink

cheers

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

"Just don't p!$$ him off by complaining about SE."

Good piece of advice! Each time I got someone with SW experience starting to use SE, most of the time they always start by "With SW I do it this way..." That is the most annoying thing. Please for at least a week with SE just say what kind of feature you want to accomplish (to your mentor if you can have one) and listen carefully to the way it works with SE. Then if after using it you still don't like it then you can start to complain.

I'm sorry I think I'm just venting a little bit :)

From my part, once you get to know how it works with SE and you get the feel of it's "mentality" you can then start to have a lot of fun using it.

Patrick

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

Star CBL for "Just don't p!$$ him off by complaining about SE."!  You must have read the OP on my recent thread!

As to the OP, thread562-208631: Tips for robust sketches and the FAQ I made from it may be of use.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

(OP)
Ok, 3 months with the new software.  Mostly just have the stuff that normally just doesn't get used very often still cropping up as 'issues'  Some of them seem to be the stuff that the tutorial exercises don't cover.

For the most part, I have noticed that SW, Pro-E, Inventor, and Mechanical Desktop all seem to speak English.  Even though it's more like New York, Texas and London versions of English, they all do the same stuff the same way with the same logic behind it.  It may be called something different, or grouped with a different toolbar, etc.  SE, to me, seems to speak Spanish :)  I'm not having the same problems as when I started, but the learning curve seems to involve forgetting other CAD systems first, THEN learn SE.

Hope I don't have to COMPLETELY empty my head to fit SE in :)  But I'll find out.

On a side note, the company I work for just got bought.  So the CAD system that everyone uses may change anyway.  Murphy says that it will be a system I haven't even heard of yet.ponder

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

Funny, I always found Pro E to be the one speaking Spanishwinky smile.

I learnt SE & Pro E about the same time.  I had formal training on Pro & taught myself SE (with a lot of help from the other users).  I found SE a lot simpler to learn.

I don't actually remember the feeling of Pro E being in a different language, just that back then every command was burried in a pull down and if you didn't do everything in the correct order you rapidly got lost!

As mentioned in my other post some of the people here still have trouble transitioning, but then I've got another who sits right next to me who has no real problem, even though he probably used Pro as much as the guy having trouble and is well in his 50s like that guy.  Weird, one's fine and one just can't get his head around it.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

Hi,

I am in exactly the opposite position, spent the last 4 years using SolidEdge and am now transitioning to SolidWorks.  I can say I have had the exact same reaction to it, I find SolidWorks very frustrating to use.  I know exactly how to accomplish a task in SE, but when I try to model something similar in SW I am immediately frustrated in the "flow" of how to accomplish a task.  SE is a very intuitive program, everything seems to be on an icon in front of you when you are going through the steps to create a feature.  SW seems to bury stuff out of site in menus and I find I have to open help files often to find where something is.  (try dimension the length of an arc in SE and then in SW, in SE it is a simple button, in SW it is a secret code...)

Drawing in 2D in SE is simply a pleasure, where in SW, forget it.  We have made the decision to actually use SE for our 2D work, and SW for 3D.  SW actually expects you to use an Autocad simulator for 2D work.  I have never used Autocad and ain't going to learn it now!

That said, I believe SolidWorks is more powerful and does seem to offer more functionality, but the transition from one to another is a painful process...

-T

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

"SW actually expects you to use an Autocad simulator for 2D work"
Say what!!!  The 2D Emulator is an add-in which was introduced to ease the transition for ACAD users. Many SW users don't even know it exists. If it has been activated on your system it can be de-activated via Tools > Add-ins.

I have to state though, that I believe the default 'flow' of SE would be easier for a user, without previous 3D experience, to learn.

cheers

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

The Autocad simulator (DWGEditor) is what was recommended to us by our VAR after showing them what we require in 2D drawings.  We produce parts to be laser cut that start as a 3D model, but require extensive work in 2D prior to sending to the laser.  The resulting shapes being cut can't be practically modeled in 3D.

What we have found works best is to generate the 3D model, create a drawing, save it as a .DWG and use SolidEdge 2D to do the editing.  Its a real pain.  I find it hard to believe that we are the only ones who require 2D editing of the drawings, but I have posed this question several times and it seems most users are simply creating dimensioned drawings and leaving it up to the machine operators to create the necessary files.

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

Ah, I see ... and understand why you would not want to use DWGeditor.

From what I remember of SE there is very little difference from SW in sketching ability, but obviously you know your product, have done the research and found what works best for you.

I am intrigued though, as to what sketch elements and/or 3D features you find difficult to create in SW. Can you post an image?

cheers

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

T1936, your workflow seems convoluted to me (no offense meant). When you say you produce parts to be lasercut, are you talking about sheetmetal parts? One thing I like about SE over SW is the fact you can save a flat pattern as DXF directly from the 3d modeling environment. No need to create a 2d drawing first then exporting to DWG.

It's one of the reasons I recommended SE over SW to my superiors last year.

Of course, if it's not sheetmetal you make, simply disregard what I said...

[Trivia] DWGEditor, supplied with SolidWorks, is actually a rebranded version of Cadopia Intellicad, an Autocad clone based on software from the Intellicad consortium. But Bricscad, another Intellicad-based software, is much closer to the Autocad UI since its version 8. Both sofwares are sold less than 10% of the cost of a regular Autocad licence.[/Trivia]

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

Gemnoc,
I'm very pleased to report that SW2008 is (at long last) also able to do that.

cheers

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

Good news for SW users. It's been there in SE for a long time, and it was in Inventor too.

How are you acclimating (if it's even a word) to the new ribbon bar Office 2007-like interface? I've seen lots of complaining about it on some blogs and forums.

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

I think the word you after is "acclimatising".

I've not seen the Office 2007 interface, but if you mean the new Command Manager, I hardly use it. I'm finding that the 'S' shortcut menu in combination with the LMB and RMB context menus are faster and more efficient.

Most of the complaining was a knee-jerk reaction to the fairly major (and sometimes unnecessary) UI changes. SW just tried to do too much in one version jump.

cheers

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

Hi,

Not sure what the Commande Manager actually is, but from the SW08 screen captures I've seen, it seems inspired by the MS Office 2007 UI. I mean, the File menu replaced by a ribbon-bar with its contents changing depending on the tab you choose.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/08/Microsoft_Office.png

Siemens is due to lauch its V21 release of Solid Edge in Spring. I wonder if they will follow on this UI scheme.

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

By the way, I find visualisation in SW08 really impressive. I mean, chrome actually looks like chrome. I don't know if those screen captures on the Net have all the display settings maxed out and are unworkable that way, but models in SW08 look great. I know this is just bells & whistle, but I hope SE V21 gets on par with SW on this subject.

They are promising the most significant release of Solid Edge since... V1.

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

I most certainly hope SE never implements a version of Realview.  Why would any body want to have to spend a fortune on new hardware just to support a performance hogging feature that shows pretty pictures during the stage of the design where it is needed the least?

If I wanted photorealistic images, I will run it through a rendering package.  For example, like SE's explode-animate-render environment.

Personally, I'm guessing that "the most significant release of SE since v1" is because they are doing something similar to SW2008 in terms of making it Vista native.  In other words, the GUI is going to be completely different.  Again, that's just my guess.

--Scott

http://wertel.eng.pro

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

Well, computers with quad-cores are already quite powerful. And, I can certainly see the use, since it allows you to take a quick good-looking snapshot to show a customer, without the hassle of going to the render environment. You can always turn the Realview off afterwards so you can continue the real work...

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

I have to agree with swertel.
A company I worked for had textures and reflections turned on by default in their template files. Then they wondered why they took so long to open, especially the larger assemblies.
My motto is keep the normal model view as simple as possible, no matter how powerful your workstation.
If you want a "pretty" view to work in then in Solid Edge you can turn on textures, shadows etc. and work like that, but please don't leave models saved that way.
I have a Core2 Quad with a Quadro FX4600 graphics card but I still keep settings turned down to get the maximum speed.

bc.

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

Gemnoc, I'm with Swertel & beachcomber.

We have models large enough where it makes a difference.  For default model display KISS.  

Plus if marketing & management can get flashy images any time they want that's all you'll spend your time doing.  If you make it clear it can be done but it's not necessarily a trivial task they're more likely to leave you alone to actually Engineer/Design.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: SolidWorks to SolidEdge Relearning Curve

Kenat,

I can't tell you how many times that has happened.  So much so, that I had to talk to the VPs to tell them to tell their people to stop bugging us for pretty pictures (plotted full size on photo paper, none the less).  Once they realized how much time it took out of a day and how much it really cost (compared to sending it to Kinko's, for example) they stopped.

But, I did manage to use SE to put the company logo on models that we submit as part of proposals.  It appears that some of our "partners" were taking our ideas and then selling them as their own.  Can't do that when every image of every model as the company's logo on it in such a position that it can't be washed off without destroying to proposal.

--Scott

http://wertel.eng.pro

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources