×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Snow Drift Windward Fetch

Snow Drift Windward Fetch

Snow Drift Windward Fetch

(OP)
For calculating snow drift on the windward side of a lower roof, ASCE 7-05 tells you to use the length of the lower roof in Fig 7-9 (ASCE 7-05 7.7.1).  If you have a situation where there is a long higher roof, followed by a relatively short lower roof, followed by another high roof, would you use only the length of the lower roof, or would you use both the first higher roof plus the lower roof on the windward side of the second low/high step?

RE: Snow Drift Windward Fetch

I'd use both the higher plus the lower roofs that are upwind from the roof-drop.  This is a situation that is not clearly indicated in the code so using the conservative interpretation is the way to go.  That and it is also logical that both the high and low upwind roofs would contribute to blowing snow.

RE: Snow Drift Windward Fetch

Would definately use the total length of the first segment of higher roof plus the lower roof to calculate the windward drift.  

You may, depending on you exact configuration, also have a leeward drift at the first step from high to low.

RE: Snow Drift Windward Fetch

I'd redesign the roof.

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Snow Drift Windward Fetch

I doubt that any code can effectively deal with the situation you describe.  The lower roof section between two high sections will have no ability to shed snow, so whatever finds its way there will stay.  Depending on the amount of snow, it could be expected to fill up until the higher level is reached.  A lot of load, and then when it melts, probably a lot of leaks.  Agree with Mike, not a good design.

RE: Snow Drift Windward Fetch

(OP)
Thank you all for your input.  The roof in question is an existing roof designed in 1967.  At that time our building code did not require the consideration of localized drift load.  The multi-level roof configuration, however, is very common, an example being a gymnasium adjacent to a single story lobby/cafeteria, office area, adjacent to a multi-story classroom wing.  

For determination of drift surcharge, I will use the more conservative approach of using the lower roof area and everything adjacent to it at an equal or higher elevation.  If anyone knows of any Code or Code Committee that has taken a position on this question, I would be interested in that.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources