×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Stress relief of 316 or 2205 in amine service ?
3

Stress relief of 316 or 2205 in amine service ?

Stress relief of 316 or 2205 in amine service ?

(OP)
Is PWHT necessary (or recommended) when using equipment & piping fabricated from 316SS or alloy 2205 in amine service (CO2 absorption)? There is a possibility that a small amount of chlorides may accumulate in the system which has me leaning toward 2205, but I can't seem to find an answer to the question of whether the equipment should be stress relieved after fabrication (either alloy).

The relatively high temperatures used to anneal stainless alloys raises the issue of vessel flange distortion and similar problems. Obviously I don't want to stress relieve the equipment if it's not warranted.

Does anyone have suggestions or a recommended industry practice for this application ?

Thanks,
Steve

RE: Stress relief of 316 or 2205 in amine service ?

PWHT is neither necessary nor recommended - the selected alloys are not susceptible to amine related damage mechanisms as indicated by API RP 571.

A properly operated sweetening process should not warrant you having to go higher than 316L.  See if these two articles are of any use to you:

www.gastreating.com/pdf/Hc%20Processing%20Apr-May%201993.pdf

Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer
http://www.pdo.co.om/pdoweb/

RE: Stress relief of 316 or 2205 in amine service ?

If you are really worried about the chlorides then go with 2205.
Don't heat treat.  You risk doing more damage than you will prevent.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Stress relief of 316 or 2205 in amine service ?

(OP)
Gents,

Thank you for the prompt replies. I had a copy of the Hydrocarbon Processing article you mentioned, and it is an example of why I turned to this forum for help. The article provides good information on corrosion mechanisms and the benefits of stress relief, but doesn't specifically indicate that stress relief is not required for stainless steels.
Several other references I had were also a little vague on the subject, and is why I came to this forum to get an opinion from the experts in the field.

Thanks again for the help,
Steve

RE: Stress relief of 316 or 2205 in amine service ?

They are right, 316 and 2205 are not susceptible to amine SCC.  In addition, these stainless steels have very low tendency to chloride SCC in amine because the alkaline nature of the amine solution is not favorable for cracking.  It has been said that pH should be lower than 6 to have significant risk of cracking.  Some studies have demonstrated 300-series stainless are resistant to Cl SCC in amine in as high as 1000 ppmw chlorides.

Hope this helps.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources