Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
(OP)
Hi
Is there anyone can help me fine a tool/equipment that can detect the Ring Main Unit underground cables? Other RMU's has capacitive test point and this will be determine by using the voltmeter. But other RMU's dont have and the termination is not elbowed rather lug type connection.
I am going to open the kiosk switchgear and earthed the cables. This determing the cable is dead because it is earthed. What I will do next is to unearthed the cable becasue I am going to test it. In order for me to test the cable is to unearthed the cable again.But I want to have a double check that the volatge (11KV,22,33KV) is not present on the cable "test before you touch" anybody?
Thanks.
Is there anyone can help me fine a tool/equipment that can detect the Ring Main Unit underground cables? Other RMU's has capacitive test point and this will be determine by using the voltmeter. But other RMU's dont have and the termination is not elbowed rather lug type connection.
I am going to open the kiosk switchgear and earthed the cables. This determing the cable is dead because it is earthed. What I will do next is to unearthed the cable becasue I am going to test it. In order for me to test the cable is to unearthed the cable again.But I want to have a double check that the volatge (11KV,22,33KV) is not present on the cable "test before you touch" anybody?
Thanks.






RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
I am asking because one who is qualified to do MV cable testing should know how to and have the equipment to verify the cable is not energized. You might want to consider hiring a qualified testing company to do this testing if you have to ask questions like that.
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
All the HV voltage testers I've come across are designed for direct contact. To start removing cable box covers and sliding down insulating boots to make a test connection to the studs is increasing the risk of inadvertently opening the wrong box and risks damaging the termination in some way. If you have to slide the boots down by hand anyway then you have defeated the object of the test.
Regards
Marmite
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
OSHA and NFPA 70E would disagree with that statement. So you are saying you can bet your life that an interlock has never and will never fail?
Tif and Salisbury make non contact voltage detectors for those voltage levels, I have never seen a person work on MV cables without owning and using a non contact detector before.
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
I would like recommend you ( It's not sale and not marketing) some intresting device from Poland. I think use it as standard device in several projects. Please see attached.
http
I know it's not exctly answer to OP, but it's important for safety.
Regards.
Slava
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
Regards
Marmite
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
"With a ring main unit the earthing is integral to the switchgear and everything is interlocked, so you would need the failure of the main contacts to open, the failure of the earthing switch to operate and the failure of the test access interlock before you get an unsafe condition."
or.. the switchgear was never grounded properly in the first place or a loose/corroded ground connection. Those who do acceptance testing on MV switchgear have all found this condition more than once.
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
Isn't important were are you: UK, US or USSR, isn't important what is a national safety rules, isn't ipmortant
swg RMU, primaty, 400V or 400kV. Don't think about it, you need think about your life or your team life.
We told about additional check before touch and additional
eq., it's all, it's nothing. Not requested time, not so much money. If will happend something, someone add to national safety rules new rows, but it isn't help to family.
Sorry for patetic.
Regards.
Slava
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
Regards
Marmite
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
Only in theory and only in HV or EHV, but not in distribution grids. I try explain two cases in the last tree years in our area, same cases and cubicles RMU in small contries. In both cases, maintanance team open all disconectors and CB's and puted moving earthing condactors. Provided maintanance, open earthing and.. in one case one person was dead in second several months in hospital.
Reason:
1. Head of team not check all 400V CB's in whole area.
2. Fail of ATS interlocks on one of 22/0.4kV xfr.
3. Standbay generators start work on the 3-phase short-circuit w/o problem after some delay.
Result is clear.
Regards.
Slava
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
1. De-energize two RMU's that are connected(one to test)
2. Earthed the cable by turning the earthing switch
3. Open the lid tank/panel.
4. Unearthed the cable by manipulating the interlocks
> The cable now is unearthed and now ready for insulation test of the cable.
BUT..before the test is done the cable now is floating and unearthed because we cannot test it, if it is earthed.
Now it now address the "test before you touch". Modiewark cannot be used at all RMU's since different RMU's have different termination type (Elbow,Lug Type etc.)
Thanks.
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
Thats not what you stated earlier, you said "you shouldn't need to test it"
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
"I am going to open the kiosk switchgear and earthed the cables. This determing the cable is dead because it is earthed. What I will do next is to unearthed the cable becasue I am going to test it. In order for me to test the cable is to unearthed the cable again"
This is perfectly acceptable and consistent with normal HV safety rules with will not allow the release of apparatus for work or testing until it has been earthed.
My point right through this thread was that once the earths have been applied you shouldn't need to test the cables for unsafe voltages. The earthing switch applies a three phase short to earth.
The thread turned into a general philosophical argument about whether you should test before touching. I don't have a problem with that, it makes perfect sense.
The problem is that the design of ring main units, unless they have capacitively coupled test points or elbow type cable connections generally precludes such testing without dismantling or infringing safety clearances to make the test.
I have considerable experience in this situation as the vast majority of UK distribution substations are equipped with ring main units.
Regards
Marmite
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
Back to OP, you simply need to get yourself an MV Voltage proximity tester. Looks like a stick with a shrouded tip, lits up when cable is energized. Just be sure to test at terminals where the grounding shield is laid back. Google it.
Additional comments: You may want to refer to 29CFR 1910.269 for guidance on making sure you don't get torched! There's a saying "TBT easier said than done" (Test Before Touch = TBT).
Peace man!
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
I have been a senior authorised person in the UK utility industry, which is the level of system authority required to put people to work on HV systems since 1990, and have not recommended any practice in this thread which is not routine or fully compliant with the UK Distribution Safety rules.
Regards
Marmite
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
I checked this points with our utilities ( power generation sector) and them saied me same as Marmite. " After disconnect earthing/grounding you don't need check again voltages". What is a difference in my understanding and may be it's our misunderstanding of Marmite position: don't connect any test devices to cable/motor/xfr w/o earthing/grounding, that mean you connect your device, other person disconnected earthing/grounding, after test again same person connect grounding and only after this you can disconnect your tester. This procedures also include many additional check points.
I would like check this issue also with our transmission and distribution sector. Actually, it's not my field, but I think safety it's very important issue in our job.
Regards.
Slava
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
David , Zogzog, we are not right!!!!!.
I read again first post of Marmite, he wrote, make your test connection before open earthing.
Marmite, sorry!!!!!!.
Best Regards.
Slava
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
"If its of the design where opening the test access removes the earth then you know its dead and earthed immediately prior to opening the test access so there's no danger."
This is an assumption that an interlock did its job, right before this you said "you shouldnt need to test it"
Now I do agree with you that after TESTING the cable you can apply grounds without doing a voltage test if your test set has an internal discharge feature.
Maybe there is a language barrier here, maybe our OSHA requirements are different in the US than the UK, maybe we have different opinions on what football is (Wait, got off track there), but you should NEVER assume that a system is de-energized until you do a voltage test (Live-Dead-Live, verifing the detector works befotre and after the test on a known live source), even if it is interlocked.
Have you ever seen the aftermath of applying grounds to an energized circuit? Its ugly, several OSHA incidents (fatalaties) can be found on www.osha.gov on this paticular accident.
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
Regards
Marmite
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
The way I've read the original post and explanations, it sounds to me as though it is being stated that it is possible and permissible to ground (earth) something, remove those grounds, and then touch the conductor. Once the grounds are removed it has to be treated as energized as it is no longer grounded, how could it be treated otherwise? If you need to test a conductor installed around energized circuits, the conductor would be switched off, grounded, proper test equipment connected, and then the grounds lifted. Such test equipment will be grounded and will contain MOVs or spark gaps to protect the test equipment from overvoltages beyond the insulation rating of the test equipment. At the conclusion of the test the grounds would be reapplied before the test equipment would be disconnected.
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
RE: Voltage Detector for Underground Cable
In the uk if a rmu was to be worked on all remote infeeds wood be isolated and a ground applied, before the rmu was released for work it would be proved dead by testing the lv local transformer terminals with all rmu switches in the "on" position.
If a cable was to be worked on from an rmu it again would be isolated and grounded, it would be identified to the point of work either by injected signal or visual trace (transfered ring) and then proved dead by spiking.
With all that in mind the work location on a particular cable could be some 10-miles away from the ground and its route runs beneath transmission lines for 5-miles.
I have seen earths applied to live circuits, fortunately all our switchgear is rated for the fault level and no serious incident has occurred apart from loss of supply, this may or may not have been prevented by some kind of voltage indication, who knows when humans are involved.
Excellent training, up to date system diagrams and procedures are essential whilst working on an electrical system.