Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
(OP)
Our City fathers have come up with the idea of flooding the streets to help eleviate basement flooding. The area of concern has combined storm and sanitary sewers, so when the sewer becomes overloaded it floods into the adjacent homes.
I am sure that I am going to be asked to study the feasibility of this effort.
Has anyone else had any experience or guidance for me?
I admit this approach sounds counter-intuitive. I mean the purpose of storm sewers is to convey water from the streets. I think the real answer is to install new sanitary sewers and separate the systems.
I am sure that I am going to be asked to study the feasibility of this effort.
Has anyone else had any experience or guidance for me?
I admit this approach sounds counter-intuitive. I mean the purpose of storm sewers is to convey water from the streets. I think the real answer is to install new sanitary sewers and separate the systems.





RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
Richard A. Cornelius, P.E.
WWW.amlinereast.com
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
Are you sure the flooding is caused by "overflows" ? Are these homes protected from sanitary and stormwater backflows by backwater valves ?
Allowing streets to flood with stormwater ( not sewage or combined flows ) is not a big problem, by itself. Indeed, it is unavoidable but allowing sanitary sewage to flood into open areas accessible to the public is a public health hazard neither you or the City Fathers can escape legal liability for. Their job and yours is preventing or dealing with such conditions, NOT creating them.
good luck
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
If you were to implement this concept with an existing system, you should first separate the flows (as you stated) and install separate systems. Untreated sewage should never be allowed to be exposed to the public.
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
"At what point is the car not repairable?
The reality is, if the water has reached that midpoint on your tire, you most likely want it to be declared a 'total loss'. Once an automobile has been flooded, the entire electrical system becomes questionable - and many critical systems are located on the bottom of the car. Water has a way of ruining electronic components, especially for vehicles equipped with a computer controlled engine management system. Again, do not start the car and owners should find an ASE certified technician to determine further damage. Vehicles that have been completely under water should be destroyed. If the car has been sitting in saltwater - consider it a total loss. Saltwater destroys paint, rubber, electrical wiring, metal and all upholstery.
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
Where are you located? If the stormwater has come in contact with the sewage, then it is all considered sewage. The intentional flooding you describe is not allowed under federal law and I would think all US states.
.
tsgrue: site engineering, stormwater
management, landscape design, ecosystem
rehabilitation, mathematical simulation
http://hhwq.blogspot.com
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
holding more than 12-inches of water should not be possible given the fact that the curb section is 6" high and the R/W has a pretty gradual slope.
there is opposition to installing backflow valves. i think this is a more appropriate (and safer during freezing weather) solution. homeowners with flooding problems should not be finishing basements and should have standpipes installed during rains.
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
Stop, run, get out of this town.
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
Separate the systems.
Mike McCann
McCann Engineering
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
Skokie, IL appararently has done something like this already.
h
My concern is with this freezing. We are in the midwest also.
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
Your wastewater treatment plant would have to be sized to handle the additional flows, loads, and whatever constituents are in the stormwater. This adds additional costs to capital improvements and to O&M.
Why not use some other techniques to store and/or dispose of the water. A stormwater collection system could be installed. LID techniques (rain gardens, absorption pits, etc.) could be used to reduce the runoff. Purchase some low property and install a detention basin. There are plenty of options to examine before you put the water into the sewer system.
I would examine possible alternatives and present these to the fathers and explain the inherent problems with the idea of putting the water to the sewers. Do some research and show them better, cheaper, easier solutions so that they have reason to change their minds.
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
Currently the systems has automatic overflows to the receiving stream. Holding the storm water portion of the combined sewer flow on the streets would serve to cut down the peak flow.
Is there anything else we should be considering?
We have concerns that once we separate, EPA is going to require that we begin pretreatment to our storm water anyways.
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
Where is this combined sewer going to? Directly to the river or into a treatment facility?
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
That is a different approach to the overloading problem; but, I still think separating it is the way to go.
Unless you are a large enough city or next to a large city and fall under the MS4 stormwater criteria, you don't currently have to treat your stormwater runoff. Even then, you don't have limits to meet. Now, that might change in a few years (who knows); but, right now you don't.
Just my thinking here; but, other things I would consider include:
What shape are the streets in?
Will ponding water soak into the subgrade and cause the pavement to fail? (ie. create maintenance problems/costs)
What kind of traffic hazard is this water/ice after a storm?
Will kids play in the standing water and be exposed to any hazardous chemicals (oils, pesticides, herbicides, bacteria from sanitary waste runoff, etc.)
There are a lot of calculations and study to do for this; but, another big consideration of mine would be: What storm event do you design for where these orifices only cause 6" of backwater? What storm event do you need to design for so that the system doesn't flood the basements? What happens when a larger storm occurs and the backwater is higher than 6" and it runs into dicksewerrat's or francesca's garage and floods his/her living room instead of his basement? Who's responsible and gets sued for their design when this happens?
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
Richard A. Cornelius, P.E.
WWW.amlinereast.com
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
.
You might be interested in this poster:
Sanitary Sewer Overflow Analysis and Planning (SSOAP) Toolbox
Rainfall Dependent Inflow and Infiltration (RDII) into sanitary sewer systems has long been recognized as a source of operating problems in sewerage systems. RDII is the main cause of sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) to basements, streets, or nearby streams. RDII can also cause serious operating problems at wastewater treatment facilities. Thus, there is a need to develop proven methodologies and computer tools to assist SSO communities in developing an optimal capital improvement program that is in line with the projected annual capital budget and provides flexibility in future improvements.
h
.
tsgrue: site engineering, stormwater
management, landscape design, ecosystem
rehabilitation, mathematical simulation
http://hhwq.blogspot.com
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
A street storage system would have to operate by detaining the street runoff before it is combined with the sewage.
There is an EPA factsheet at:
http
The EPA example is (a) a residential street, not major arterial, and (b) in a sag condition.
I don't think this idea is practical on a continuous grade or on a higher use street, but could be used in certain instances to make "self mitigating" streets. I think street edge "rain gardens" ala Seattle "SEA street" is a preferable system because you can maintain traffic flow and get more storage in a sunken landscape than the 6-inch max you would be able to store in the sag of a typical curbed street.
For two 12-ft lanes with typical 6-inch curbs, at 2% cross-slope and crowned in the center, your average storage depth would be about 4.4 inches, which is not too shabby so long as there is not much run-on from adjacent surfaces. Maybe that's why the increased the curb height in Skokie and Wilmette.
I assume this would work by putting orifices/flow regulators at catch basin outlets (NOT by allowing combined sewage to back up, which as noted above would never be allowed and would be a huge public health hazard). Who would be responsible for maintaining/cleaning these flow restrictors?
I'd provide an overflow grate (or two or three) outside the roadway "prism" because this type of system will tend to overflow the curbs and flood adjacent properties when storms exceed the volume or intensity of the design storm used to size the orifice/restrictor devices.
Maybe your City founding fathers should consider some incentives for private property owners to implement "source controls" such a green roofs or porous pavement. I've heard that Minneapolis recently restructured stormwater utility fees so that those contributing the most runoff pay the highest stormwater fees, and fees could be reduced by implementing stormwater control measures. Previously, their stormwater fees were linked to water bills and usage, so a single family residence was paying a higher stormwater fee than a pay-parking lot that did not use water at all.
That said, our research has shown that as much as 40% of all urban land is public street and right-of-way, so for most combined sewerage areas, controlling discharges from private properties is only part of the solution, and managing street and sidewalk runoff may have to be addressed sooner or later, as would be done by using street storage.
I would prefer a big underground detention tank to retrofit a street if I was an agency, however, because it would require less maintenance overall (one-stop shopping vs a multitude of flow restrictors at every inlet). Maintenance could be one of the ultimate factors for deciding that street storage is not a practicable solution.
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water
And your town probably can't afford it. This is not just out of the box but it is out of somewhere. If you actually proceed with this be prepared to talk to Lawyers the rest of your life.
RE: Flooding Streets to Control Storm Water