×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Silo PSVs

Silo PSVs

Silo PSVs

(OP)
A plant is constructed with silos to store the finished dry resin product.  The silos are 8900 cu. ft. capacity, SA516 gr 70 material, design pressure 3.6 psi, static head 24 psi.  The silo was constructed per API 620, and is ASME code-stamped. Material is to be pneumatically conveyed to the silos and a dust collector is provided on top of each that vents to the atmosphere.  However, no relief valves are provided in the design for the silo.  My question is, is a PSV or PVSV still required?  Or maybe just good safe practice?  I have worked in PVC, and all silos had at least pressure relief (some also vacuum relief) on a separate nozzle in addition to the dust collectors, even if the dust collectors had high differential pressure alarms.  It would seem to me dP alarms are only there to protect the filter.

RE: Silo PSVs

You say the design pressure is 3.6 psi...psi what? psia? psig?

A design pressure of 3.6 psig is well below that required for an ASME stamp; minimum being anything greater than 15.0 psig.

If this is indeed code stamped then you must provide an ASME certified relief device and it doesn't have to be a valve, it could be a rupture disk. AND, how is it that is is constructed to API 620? To get a code stamp the construction has to meet ASME criteria.

ASME does not require vacuum protection but API 620 does, API also requires over pressure protection but the type of device is not ASME certified. Indeed, if the set pressure of the relief device is less than 15 psig, it will not be ASME certified.

I would hope the dust collector has an explosion panel.

RE: Silo PSVs

(OP)
Pleckner, thanks for your help.  I reviewed the design and stress calculation sheet again, and I am confused.  The nameplate MAWP is 3.6 PSI (all pressure values given are in 'PSI'; I assume that means psig), but further down in the calculations it states that the design pressure is 3.6 PSI but the component lowest MAWP (conical reducer) is 30 PSI, which would make it a pressure vessel.

BTW, there is a dedicated conveying blower for this system which has a safety relief at 12 psig.  Experiments show that this material does not propagate dust explosions. The dust collector does not have an explosion panel.

So if the MAWP is truly 30 psig, then I am understanding that API 620 requires both overpressure and vacuum protection, correct?  Can you provide the section that states that?

RE: Silo PSVs

If the design pressure or MAWP is 30 psig, then this does not fall within API 620 but ASME Section VIII, Div. 1.

But the design pressure (or MAWP) is taken at the top of the vessel and not at the bottom so that will govern what type of vessel this is.

RE: Silo PSVs

(OP)
Either way, API 620 or ASME Section 8, it still requires a relief valve - correct?

RE: Silo PSVs

Yes and for vacuum protection. For lower pressures, investigate conservation/breather vents from vendors such as ProtectoSeal and Groth.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources