×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wetted Surface of S&T exchanger

Wetted Surface of S&T exchanger

Wetted Surface of S&T exchanger

(OP)
Recently I joined a discussion about safety considerations for external fire scenario. When calculating the wetted surface for protecting the tube side of an heat exchanger it was discussed whether to include the shell surface and the heads or whether to include just the head surfaces. There were basically two opinions:

1. The fluid in the tubes is not in direct contact to the shell side, therefore the shell surface does not have to be considered.
2. For heat exchangers with liquid (!) on the shell side, the heat transfer coefficient through the tube walls during a fire scenario becomes considerable high, therefore the surface of shell AND heads has to be considered to stay on the safer side.

The latter approach seems to be quite conservative but actually I have seen both approaches in different projects  several times and couldn't find anything in API521 about it. I would appreciate your comments to this topic! Thanks!

RE: Wetted Surface of S&T exchanger

API does not consider the tubes in an external fire. Wetted surface of the vessel for a fire scenario is just that, a wetted surface exposed to the fire and this clearly does not include internals like the tubes of a S&T heat exchanger. Indeed, the tubes add nothing to the vapor rate generated and to be relieved by the relief device on the shell.

RE: Wetted Surface of S&T exchanger

BaAn...

The API521 code mentions neither heat exchangers, pumps, piping strainers etc....etc..

It is my understanding that these components do not require a fire protection evaluation and the possible addition of relief devices. Whereas there is a real risk of an API-650 tank experiencing overpressure and rupture almost immediately during the first minutes of a fire, the same is not true for segments of piping in the same area.

Futhermore, the liquid volume contained is typically much, much smaller

The need for fire protection of all non-tank components should be addressed during a HAZOP

-MJC

  

RE: Wetted Surface of S&T exchanger

API 521 (which is a standard and note a code) does indeed mention heat exchangers. Only the shell of a S&T heat exchanger will get the ASME stamp and if appropriate, this must be evaluated for a fire relief scenario as well as all other credible scenarios. This of course implies the requirement for some type of ASME certified relief device.

RE: Wetted Surface of S&T exchanger

I stand corrected, thank you

-MJC

  

RE: Wetted Surface of S&T exchanger

BaAn,

In case of fire you should consider the shell side, the tube channel surface is much smaller than the shell, also if the HE is insulated you reduce the relief flow.

In case of fire there will be no temp difference (thermodynamics...) between the shell and tube sides so if you protect the shell side it is protecting also indirectly the tube side.

regards,
         roker


RE: Wetted Surface of S&T exchanger

(OP)
Thanks for your valuable comments! I am tending to follow Roker's advice as this approach is certainly on the safer side and makes sense on a thermodynamical understanding, even if it's not required by API 521 as Pleckner mentioned!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources