×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Timber Bridge Lateral Bracing

Timber Bridge Lateral Bracing

Timber Bridge Lateral Bracing

(OP)
Hi,

I have a short timber bridge which is 10'0" long x 8'-0" wide. The architect wants a concrete abutment at one end and diagonal braces from the bottom of the concrete abutment to support the other end of the bridge. We would like to keep the bridge independent from the existing structure.

I am concerned about the lateral stability of the bridge since in effect I have a cantilevered diaphragm. Are there any limitations to this? And what rule of thumb would you use to calculate the lateral load since it is pretty much an open light bridge.

Thanks

RE: Timber Bridge Lateral Bracing

Well, the bridge is 8 foot wide so you should be able to design it to take lateral no problem.  How high is this bridge? I wonder how you do the transition from the bridge to the structure.  You need to make sure there is plenty of gap.  If the edge of the cantilevered bridge trusses touches the structure, it will put out load almost like simply supported beam.

RE: Timber Bridge Lateral Bracing

You have to provide at least two sets of horizontal cross bracing. One in the plane of the diagonal braces and one below the superstructure. You might need vertical cross bracing near the abutment.

RE: Timber Bridge Lateral Bracing

(OP)
The bridge is about 10 feet off the ground. I've designed it pretty stiff and left a 1/2" gap at the end. I'm hoping that I don't have to put in any bracing but to use the timber deck as a diaphragm. Worse case scenario, I'm thinking off adding angles on each side of the bridge at the structure location just so I don't have a cantilevered diaphragm. The angles will be connected to the structure and would allow the bridge to deflect but not move from side to side.

Any comments?

RE: Timber Bridge Lateral Bracing

sounds like a good idea.  You have to make sure the bridge is really stiff and wont budge due to win.  Or you will get your self a repeated impact load on to the angles that might damage the structure.

RE: Timber Bridge Lateral Bracing

What is the decking? I'm thinking planks only, which will not work as a diaphragm.

It could be designed as a diaphragm, but you would need to go through the same design requirements as per a shear wall. After including the restraint needed for wind loads on the beams, it's probably easiest to follow bridgebusters suggestions.

RE: Timber Bridge Lateral Bracing

(OP)
Hi Gwynn,

Why can't I use 1x6 T&G planks as a diaphragm. What's the difference between that at plywood other than the spacing of the joints (ie every four or 8 feet for plywood and every 6" for the decking)

For the load to transfer across the joints I've always looked at it as the load getting into the nails, then the rafters, back through the nails across the joint and then back into the diaphragm.

Am I missing something

RE: Timber Bridge Lateral Bracing

(OP)
Hi Gwynn,

Why can't I use 1x6 T&G planks as a diaphragm. What's the difference between that at plywood other than the spacing of the joints (ie every four or 8 feet for plywood and every 6" for the decking)

For the load to transfer across the joints I've always looked at it as the load getting into the nails, then the rafters, back through the nails across the joint and then back into the diaphragm.

Am I missing something?

RE: Timber Bridge Lateral Bracing

The difference is the moment arm between connecters. For a 1x6 plank you have at most 5" between nails in the same member. In a sheet of plywood or OSB you have much further between the edge nails. Without this moment developing you have no restraint on lateral movement of the bridge, both beams will just deflect the same amount.

Any significant lateral loads on the bridge could fail the connections (likely pullout of the nails). This is the reason most areas have banned the use of shiplap sheathing in shear walls and require OSB, plywood, etc. instead. Even if it does not fail the connections, you will likely have large lateral deflections.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources