×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion
7

SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion

SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion

(OP)
We have the second of our Ozone plants on line. The plants are processing / using the same source water.
This is all well and good but on the second plant on - stream we seem to be experiencing through the weld leaks.

The pipes in question operate at ~ ~ 4  p H.

We have not had problems with the first plant and this has
been a real curve ball -

We have about 40 joints leaking and this is totally new to
my experience as I have worked with austenitic stainless
in ASME Section VIII and Piping and have not experienced this since 1968 -

Has anyone experienced anything similar  ?   ?    ?

RE: SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion

2
316, pH = 4, slightly warm water, as welded.
I figure that you can handle about 10 ppm Cl before pitting kills you.
A heat of material with a bit lower Nitrogen, or welds that have a bit more oxidation and maybe 5ppm Cl would be the limit.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Still trying to help you stop corrosion.
formerly Trent Tube, now Plymouth Tube
eblessman@plymouth.com
or edstainless@earthlink.net

RE: SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion

As always EdStainless, you have nailed it. Look at the material certification for each of the installations for the pipe. Also look at the weld procedure. If the second plant has been welded at a higher heat input the weld will be more susceptable to pitting attack.

Mark Hutton


RE: SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion

Take a look at the molybdenum contents too.  The first installation may well have had a reasonable amount of molybdenum compared with the second facility.  Borderline performance can be tipped one way or another by molybdenum and, of course, suppliers like to aim at the low end of the range.

Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer
http://www.pdo.co.om/pdoweb/

RE: SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion

maybe it's a problem of welding sensitization, intergranular corrosion, or maybe a wrong filler materials. To say something it's necessary to make a failure analysis of the weld.

S.

http://www.corrosionist.com

RE: SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion

I see 316L fail in warm potable water service with great regularity.
You should have some standard metallographic work done.  Base metal and weld filler chemistries are easy.  Looking at the degree of coring (segregation) in the welds would be my next step.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Still trying to help you stop corrosion.
formerly Trent Tube, now Plymouth Tube
eblessman@plymouth.com
or edstainless@earthlink.net

RE: SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion

Welds are susceptible especially to pitting corrosion when sulfur is high, 0.007% to 0.015% is common, to facilitate weld penetration. It doesn't show up in the tubing itself because the longitudinal welds have been annealed.

We all really need to move away from 316 to lean duplex, such as 2101 and 2003. We don't need to make Norilsk richer than they are already. The 10% nickel in 316 is a tremendous waste of money and of a scarce resource. It takes end users, such as the members of this forum, to make this happen.

Michael McGuire
http://stainlesssteelforengineers.blogspot.com/

RE: SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion

I have will have to disagree with some of the above posts concerning chlorides and 316L SS piping. We have a waste system with over a mile of pipe where the Chloride levels vary from 500 to 1000 ppm with pH in the range from 2 to 7 with a temperature around 150F. This line runs 24/7/365.

I have never seen pitting in the welds on this line. The corrosion rate in this system is very low < 0.005 ipy, measured.
I would suspect that you have a problem with weld contamination that is causing your problem. I have seen SS welds diluted with about every alloy around.

One other problem I've seen is where you have water line, in our case cooling tower water, where there is considerable downtime creating stagnate conditions where MIC has preferentially attacked the welds.

RE: SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion

There is really not enough information to provide any diagnosis of this problem. Have you removed a section of the weld and pipe to confirm if corrosion pitting is confined to the welds or are you just observing this visually as external leaks at weld joints?

Remove a section of the failed line w/a butt weld and have it analyzed by a competent metallurgical lab.

RE: SS 316 L Thru weld corrosion

McG, I haven't seen S in those levels causing problems unless you are talking about very thick sections.  Usually the benefit of smoother more uniform welds helps more than the S hurts.  Over the 0.015% level you do start to see reduction in pitting resistance.

Syd, 316 can be very unpredictable, there are so many environments that are so close to depassivating that minor details can push you over.  With constant flow and no deposits you can run seawater in 316L, but stop the flow for a few hours and you will destroy the lines.  Local oxygen levels and pH are everything.
You are fortunate with your system.  It is well beyond a reasonable application for 316L.  I would consider 2205 suitable, but nothing lower.

Minor variations in weld practice can be a killer.  Poor back shielding, too high or low of delta ferrite levels, too high of heat input, and about 10 other things can all cause significant reductions in pitting resistance in the welds or weld HAZs.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources