Competence
Competence
(OP)
What are the engineering connotations of competence? If someone is competent, does it have a positive or negative connotation with that person? If advice is given to study enough to pass for competence, is the advice good or bad?





RE: Competence
RE: Competence
How about 'average'?
Cheers
Greg Locock
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: Competence
The basic symptom of incompetency is the inability to discern what is truly needed to accomplish a job. Incompetent people generally believe they are doing a fine job, until they are enlightened as to what standards that job truly requires.
A competent person is able to judge when he is in over his head.
I saw what happened. Claw marks healing OK?
RE: Competence
A special form of incompetance that lets you get into trouble that can't be reached with regular incompetance.
From my point of view competent is a compliment. Extraordinary is a better compliment, but failing that I'll take competent.
RE: Competence
If you give a more detailed example you may get a better response, are you talking about posts in another forum in this site.
KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
RE: Competence
com·pe·tent /?k?mp?t?nt/
–adjective
1. having suitable or sufficient skill, knowledge, experience, etc., for some purpose; properly qualified: He is perfectly competent to manage the bank branch.
2. adequate but not exceptional.
RE: Competence
David
RE: Competence
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: Competence
RE: Competence
In the same breath, if someone called me, for lack of a better word, competent; I'd be pissed.
V
Mechanical Engineer
"When I am working on a problem, I do not think of beauty, but when I've finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong."
- R. Buckminster Fuller
RE: Competence
Competence has to do with being able to get a job done in a way that satisfies the requirements of the task at hand. It has a lot do with being able to communicate intelligently with people involved in the task and understanding the requirements for the task, then having the skills to address the requirements.
Ken Sauter
Designer
RE: Competence
"Competent" means "able to do the job". The word itself has no negative aspect.
Many enterprises work to assess and refine their "core competencies", things they do effectively. Interesting how competency is so positive when viewed from an enterprise perspective, and can be perceived as a sleight on a personal level.
I don't put much credence in Dictionary.com's 2nd definition. It sounds pithy and poorly researched. No such entry in Webster's. Makes me question the competence of Dictionary.com's editorial staff.
RE: Competence
noun 1 the quality or extent of being competent. 2 dated an income large enough to live on.
http://w
competent:
adjective 1 having the necessary skill or knowledge to do something successfully. 2 satisfactory or adequate, though not outstanding: she spoke quite competent French. 3 having legal authority to deal with a particular matter.
http
Tick, seems that Oxford entry too is "pithy and poorly researched"
Hmm, Websters or OED, which to pick...
KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
RE: Competence
Rick is a competent engineer.
Fred is an adequate engineer.
Billl is an average engineer.
Which one would you pick for your team?
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.
RE: Competence
Presumably average is better than adequate since the inadequate get weeded out.
OED states that competent implies adequate.
Hence based on the info available Bill is my pick.
QED
KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
RE: Competence
RE: Competence
They're also great at writing security systems: their methods are totally inconsistent. Even with all the source code, you can't figure out what's happening. What chance does a hacker have?
RE: Competence
RE: Competence
RE: Competence
What you are describing is passing an exam that demonstrates competence.
"Pass for" means "appear to be", "give the impression of being", "be believed/considered to be", or other things that aren't quite actually *being* what you're talking about.
Typical uses are along the lines of "When I dye my hair, I can pass for 10 years younger than I am."
"Passing for competence" implies not being actually competent, but being able to give the impression of competence. It doesn't mean passing an exam.
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: Competence
RE: Competence
so, When I say "pass for competence", You were thinking that one should do enough to give the appearance of competence. I was always under the impression that "pass for" means "to gain". So when I say "pass for competence", you saw "to appear to have competence", whereas I meant "to gain competence". Would that have been the better terminology? To clarify myself, I don't condone posers, nor would I advertently give any advice in which to feign knowledge to make onself appear competent.
IAA
RE: Competence
"Competence" means, at a minimum, having what it takes to do the job. This could be anywhere from just barely to world expert. All "competent" really means is "not incompetent".
Take a situation where one might be expected to say something unambiguously quite positive, and that does not include the possibility of "just barely". Suppose one then says "competent", which does include the "just barely" possibility.
In such a case, the assumption can be and often is made that the introduction of that "just barely" possibility was made for a reason, and that the speaker's intent was in fact to convey the "just barely" meaning. If you could have said more and you didn't, the assumption is that you had no more to say.
In my own use, "competence" when it comes to qualifications and other legalistic situations means the state of having achieved a certain qualification, no more and no less. But if I ask someone, "How good an engineer is X?" and am told, "X is competent," I take that as a bad recommendation. It should go without saying that X is competent; the alternative is that X is incompetent, in which X really should not be practicing. But if all the recommender can tell me is merely that X is not incompetent, I must assume that there isn't much else good to say abut X's skills.
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: Competence
RE: Competence
It's important for the receiver a message to properly decode what the sender is saying. To do so, the listener must attempt to evaluate the message not just by his own connotations of key words, but must also try to see what connotations the sender is using. Obviously, there is a failure to do so in this case.
RE: Competence
(Before my reputation gets dragged through the mud: yes, I am amusing myself here. I know 500 kg is 2500 pounds!)
RE: Competence
2. In my understanding "competent" ususaly means the first of Oxford's definitions (thanks to Kenat for posting):
competent:
adjective 1 having the necessary skill or knowledge to do something successfully.
It would have to be related to a specific job (i.e. I am a competent engineer but an incompetent ballet dancer, see kgs/lbs above). Also, if I am successfull in the said job, that is a positive thing and the "just barely" has no meaning.
RE: Competence
Look at the reaction in this very thread to "adequate". "Adequate" means the same thing as "competent" (outside of a formal qualification situation), and yet there are plenty of people on this thread who saw "adequate" as not very positive, and "competent" as much better. They read "just barely" into it.
The question really can't be answered in the absolute, without a full context. The context given in the OP happens to be one in which "competent" wasn't the only word in doubt, so it really can't be used as an illustration of use of and reaction to the word "competent".
And speaking of other parts of the OP, just looking at the dictionary definition of "pass for", "gain" is not one of the meanings. There is as one of the meanings "be accepted as", which could imply something positive, but just about every citation of the phrase I can find is negative. Google for "pass for", "passes for", "passing for" and you'll see what I mean.
So overall, "pass for competence" is quite bad, but this doesn't say much about whether "competent" is good or bad.
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: Competence
"The engineer is competent" = "The ship floats"
As I see it it is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for an engineer to be a good engineer.
It can only be a compliment when used as the opposite of something violently negative, in a context like "That department is full of dumbos, except John - now THAT's a competent engineer".
RE: Competence
RE: Competence
...it's a BINARY word conveying "either/or," it is not an ANALOG word conveying "degree/ranking."
RE: Competence
Hg
Eng-Tips policies: FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: Competence
like HgTX, when it's used to describe your opinion of someone's ability "what do you think of ... ?" then "oh, he's competent" means a host of things. this could be clarified by asking "so you think he's really good ?"; the reply tells what was meant.
RE: Competence
Good Luck
--------------
As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
RE: Competence
competent - next 10%
adequate - next 35%
marginal - next 10%
incompetent - the rest
This is after lowering my expectations to maintain sanity.
RE: Competence
RE: Competence
RE: Competence