×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Depth reduction in existing beam

Depth reduction in existing beam

Depth reduction in existing beam

(OP)
I have 40 in deep existing steel beam 40 feet long span. For sure beam is overly designed. I need to cut out 20" deep
and 5' long piece of beam to provide clearance. At the new short section I can add plates to  mock reduced size W beam. But any other thing I need to know in design which can affect especially due to abrupt change in section.

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

You need to analyze the beam with its reduced section properties for the loading which it carries.  Then if the reduced section is adequate, the flange plates need to be carried a generous distance past the termination of the old flange.  Nothing mysterious, just do the numbers.

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

There is a free webinar sponsored by the AISC called "Steel Design after College" which discusses the latest research on what constitutes bracing and how it affects LTB, see www.aisc.org.  It costs nothing to view.

There are twelve sections in the webinar but I believe the pertinent discussion occurs in the first and second one.

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

Due to the reduced section, regardless of the load seen, there will be new deflection not seen previously by what it supports.  Better ask yourself what the structure can tolerate.

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

(OP)
hokie66
How long I should extend the new flanges?

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

"For sure beam is overly designed."  How do you know?  I would analyze the beam for the loads it carries to be sure.  If it is part of a portal frame, don't forget to check it for lateral loads in addition to gravity loads.

The AISC Manual of Steel Construction discusses how far to extend cover plates beyond where they are needed--your new flange is not exactly a cover plate, but I think these rules would apply.

DaveAtkins

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

"How long I should extend the new flanges?"

they should overlap far enough that the load can shear into the new flange ... practically, i'd see this being done by angles eteneding over the new flange and projecting back into the original beam ... calcs will tell you how far this needs to be

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

With the decrease in depth, I would check the web shear at the reduced section too.  Might need web stiffeners.

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

Dave is on the right track for length of the new flanges, but I would be a bit more conservative because the force in the flange has to go through the web to get to the existing flange.  You actually will transition between three shapes; the cut section with new flanges, the original section with added plates on the side, and the original section.

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

As it has been mentioned before, by cutting the section at that location, increased deflections will surely follow. Not only that Dgkhan, you do not mention if this beam is isolated or not, but if it is part of a structural frame, basically you might be changing the structural model.

Even if the reduced section can take the load, in effect, reduced stiffness is almost creating a pin connection, which would change the way the frame reacts to loads (wind, earthquake,...) moving stresses from one part of the structure to another part, which might not have been designed for it.

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

I don't know......... reducing the section depth by 1/2?  I guess it is good that it is on the tension side, but it seems to me like there would be some SERIOUS stress concentrations at the abrupt (and LARGE) section change that might need to be considered in addition to the strength issues.

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

... facts not in evidence.  Tension/compression/spanwise location not revealed so far.



Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Depth reduction in existing beam

i guess he assumed it was the lower cap that was being raised, to increase headroom ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources