×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

New FirePumps

New FirePumps

New FirePumps

(OP)

Recently our engineering group purchased and started installling 4 firepump assemblies in our utilities plant.  Each of these assemblies consists of a firepump controller, a pump and a 250HP motor.  The decision to replace the older firepumps was made because the older pumps were installed in 1962 and the pumps had started having problems.  Each older pump was driven by a GE 250HP motor. In 2003 a new 2400kW (800kW ea standby) Kohler parallel, random access E/G system was installed.  Prior to purchasing the E/G system
was modeled as were the 4 older firepumps using factory data (inertia, torque curves, etc).  Static and dynamic motor starting was done under various operational scenarios using both the normal source and the E/G system. The modeling reavealed various problems that were corrected with the E/G manufacturer.  The E/G system when finally installed and test ran all the commissioning tests without a hitch.

No such modeling and motor starting simulations were performed or allowed to be performed.  The logic used was that as long as the motors were the same horsepower then everything would work as before.  

Comments please.



RE: New FirePumps

Well, _if_ the assertion that bothers you (and me) is true, then it should be no big deal at all to re- run the commissioning tests with the new motors.

... Just to keep everyone honest.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: New FirePumps

Seems to me that there are a few major assumptions there. And how is it that we spell that word in sigular form?

ASS - U - me

Are the motor designs exactly the same? What if the starting current is higher?
What if the motor starting torque is lower, making the acceleration time longer (very possible with newer high efficiency motors)?
Is the installation exactly the same?
What if there are fewer cables with more impedance?

Fire pump systems seem like bad places to do the ass-u-me thing.

RE: New FirePumps

Is the person who decided that modelling was unnecessary prepared to defend that decision in court if the system falls over during a real emergency and someone is hurt or killed as a consequence of the firefighting system failing?

What do the insurers think about an unproven, un-designed firefighting system? Is the site's insurance even valid under these circumstances?
 

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources