×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Definintion of "open to atmosphere"

Definintion of "open to atmosphere"

Definintion of "open to atmosphere"

(OP)
We have fire protection sprinkler systems on our coolant circulation pumps. Basically the sub-system has a 3” piping supply (no orifices) with 8 Nozzles. The pressure before the isolation valve is 1100 kPa (abs) with the fire pumps running, while the pressure at the nozzle would be about 1000 kPa (abs) if sprays were in-service (information from commissioning tests).
Modified piping welds were performed downstream of the isolation valves.  ASME 137.3.2 is being used to justify not pressure testing the new welds by defining the pipes as “lines open to the atmosphere”.
Can theses lines be classified as “open to atmosphere”?
 
Note: It is possible to install blind flanges or plug the nozzles to perform a pressure test.

Also relevant is ASME III ND-6111 Scope of Pressure Testing which states;
 
The following portions of piping systems whose only function is to transport fluids to and from spray ponds, lakes, reservoirs, or tanks which are open to the atmosphere are exempt:
(1) piping downstream of the last isolation valve preceding the pipe discharge to the spray pond, lake, reservoir or tank; and
(2) piping upstream of the intake pump inlet isolation valve.

Fire protection standards all have testing requirements for sprinkler systems.

Thks Dale

RE: Definintion of "open to atmosphere"

This probably comes down to a jurisdictional question.  Where I am located those lines would be non-expansible fluid and therefore outside of the jurisdiction's authority.  This would then fall on the contract spelled out between the owner and fabricator/designer.  The contract would call out what the design code is to be used and therefore the inspection and testing requirements.

Personally, if the welds did leak a bit it wouldn't matter to me as the leak is small in relation to the reason the system is in operation.  They would only become an issue if they completely failed and did not deliver the water to where it was required.  

EJL

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources