×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Signature bridges

Signature bridges

RE: Signature bridges

From the article:

Quote:

Signature Bridge Economics 101:
It is difficult to compare unit costs of one bridge to another as each bridge has a unique foundation and superstructure design, and potentially wide variations in labor, equipment, and material costs. However; in current dollars, a basic short or medium span steel girder or prestressed girder bridge can be built for $100 to $200 per square foot of deck area. By comparison, a sampling of cable stayed bridges built over the past twenty years shows the range to be more like $400 to $800 per square foot of deck area. In some cases this increase in cost is warranted due to site conditions and span lengths.

Real Bridge Economics 101:  You can't compare "basic short or medium span" birdges to cable-stayed bridges, which are typically long spans, or at least medium.

And are there really *that* many signature bridges going up to warrant a 20-page rant on the subject?  

That said, most well-designed bridges look pretty good if you just leave them alone and keep the architects' hands off them.

Hg

Eng-Tips policies:  FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Signature bridges

(OP)
I agree with you HgTX, you can not compare the construction costs of medium span bridge projects and large span bridge projects. However, the point can be made that some bridge projects have huge differences in cost, more that it would appear to be reasonable, and I think that that is the point of the article.

Comparations are never fair, but the Cooper River Bridge in SC was built for about 630M USD (including foundations and approaches). On the other hand, the new East Bay Bridge project will cost about 6,300M USD, with 1,400 M USD for the superstructure alone (no foundations) of the main span (no approaches), with a span size relatively similar and both bridges on seismic areas.
As I said, comparations are never fair, but it seems to me that the cost for a 'signature bridge' can be quite significant. Does it warrant an article? I think it does, this is a growing trend, 23 M USD for a footbridge (Sundial Bridge) is quite a bit of money.

I am not opposed to signature bridges, I just think that people has to understand what the issues are.

And yes, keep architects away

Cooper River Bridge
http://www.donaldmacdonaldarchitects.com/news/n_images/cooper_post_cour/july2_spec.pdf

New East Bay Bridge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_span_replacement_of_the_San_Francisco-Oakland_Bay_Bridge

Sundial Bridge
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundial_Bridge_at_Turtle_Bay

RE: Signature bridges

Signature bridges are more than just structures - If a community thinks it is worthwhile to make it special, why not?

Architects are annoying, but I do not agree that we should keep the the away completely.  After a basic configuration that makes sense structurally is established, let them pretty things up.  They can also help with laying out piers and other elements in a way that is harmonious with the environment but not bad structurally.  I have had some good experiences with architects working this way.

I have had bad experiences too with architects that try to dictate structural shapes that create huge moments, have fatigue issues, or are be difficult to inspect and maintain.


RE: Signature bridges

My state has a requirement to spend 1% of any project on art. Seems like we should have then engineers do the design, and then use 1% to make it more pleasing.

RE: Signature bridges

kelowna, I couldn't make myself read all 21 pages of that article, sorry.

I think I get the gist, though, and my perspective is that the public should get a nice-looking bridge if it's in a prominent, visible location where what it looks like really matters.

I do notice, though, that when the public is asked for opinions on different bridge-configuration options (or, for that matter, when the public volunteers opinions), the all-important price-tag information is too often either missing completely or not shared in a way that really brings it home.

The public ought to be asked, would you be willing to pay $x more in taxes for "y" years to get THIS pretty type of bridge instead of THAT ordinary-looking type of bridge?

And bridge details or types that are not as safe as alternatives should just be nixed, in my opinion, no matter how pretty they might be.

RE: Signature bridges

As a designer of both Buildings and Bridges I most say we need to keep Architect’s away from bridges.  Just look at how Architect’s shop around for lower fee’s from Structural and MEP, this way they can have higher profits.  Do you want them to get a hold of your bridge fees?  Do you want an Architect to try and take over your project?  

The earliest Architect’s were really Engineer’s, the structure’s they designed were works of art.  Think of the great monuments of the World, do you ever hear of anyone talking about the floor plan, the colors, or the fixtures?  No, you see the structure, the arches, beams, walls, etc.  That’s why a bridge Engineer is basically an original Architect.  So in a way you can say that Architect’s already design bridges, they just have PE stamps and not AIA stamps.  

RE: Signature bridges

Cwrugrad,

You hit the nail on the head.  The public is not aware of the costs and the government is not pushing to give it to them.

In the US, most money is allocated to a region by formula.  If you have so many miles of road, so much population, ..., you get "X" dollars of funding from the higher government levels.  If you spend it all on one bridge, you don't get anything else for the rest of the cycle.  But the public doesn't know how all this works.  They just think they can get it all on this project and it comes out of the "big pot".  But it really comes out of their small pot.  And then they complain about the roads with potholes in their area.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources