×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Timber Roof Spread
6

Timber Roof Spread

Timber Roof Spread

(OP)
Hi all.

I'm designing a timber cut roof with a lack of triangulation.  It typically consists of 2 rafters supported at the feet on block walls.  There is a raised collar tie about 1/3 depth from the ridge.  There is no ring beam at eaves.

Has anybody any experience in what to check for this case?

RE: Timber Roof Spread

I run this situation on the computer (I use RISA 3D).  In my experience, the connection between the collar and the rafter is most critical, followed by the bending-axial interaction in the rafter.

DaveAtkins

RE: Timber Roof Spread

Right Dave.  

And you'd better consider the deflection of the rafters the collar tie is pulling on.  Might have to make the rafters larger, maybe double them up with a single member collar tie.  Then you get double shear on the bolts too.

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Timber Roof Spread

(OP)
Thanks guys.

I'm actually more concerned about possible supporting wall spread.  What lateral deflection limits do you use for the wall?  In the past I've used H/300 as my limit.

Another option I've checked before is to use a pinned support at each of the feet of the rafters and applied the lateral load from the rafters to the wall.  This will induce an overturning moment about the bottom of the wall.  The resisting moment of the wall is the (weight of the wall + dead load) x  lever arm.  I've never been able to prove this however.

Any suggested checks on the supporting walls?

RE: Timber Roof Spread

SOunds like you need a structural ridge to prevent your rafters from deflecting, thus preventing the spread.

RE: Timber Roof Spread

Allowable deflection at the top of the wall depends on wall finishes.  H/300 would be fine for masonry--I think you could allow H/180 for less brittle finishes.  Remember that if your model has a roller at one support, and a pin at the other, the horizontal movement at the roller can be divided by 2 (half of the movement is taken by each wall).

I disagree with trying to resist a horizontal thrust with a wall, unless it is reinforced concrete or reinforced CMU.  Steel cantilever columns might also work.  But I can't see a wood framed wall resisting the thrust.

DaveAtkins

RE: Timber Roof Spread

(OP)
Thanks guys.

I've actually used DaveAtkins' solution in the past-I was just looking for some comfort in my logic I suppose!

Also DaveAtkins 2nd point I would agree with, as my wall overturning calculations would suggest.

RE: Timber Roof Spread

In some places they call this an A-frame truss due to the shape.

Rafters cantilever out from the collar ties.

Lateral loads taken by sheathing.

It can all be done pretty easy by hand treating the rafters as a cantilevered continuous beam.

csd

RE: Timber Roof Spread

Really, there are three ways to control any lateral wall movement here short of adding a ridge beam:

1.  Increase the rafter size; or

2.  Increase the E of the rafters; or

3.  Lower the collar tie.

Just pin one end of the collar tie, put the other on rollers, and play with the results.  The less bending in the rafters, the less lateral movement.

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Timber Roof Spread

or

4. put a load bearing ridge beam in.

RE: Timber Roof Spread

As I said csd, short of adding a ridge beam.  bigsmile

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Timber Roof Spread

sorry Mike.

RE: Timber Roof Spread

No worries csd.  

Another thought, and kind of a corollary to the idea of lowering the collar tie, is to increase the roof slope, leaving the collar tieat the same elevation.  The effect is to decrease the tension in the chord tie, and may decrease the rafter deflection.  You may be able to reduce the live load with increased roof slope too which would further reduce the tension force.  Downside is the rafters are longer which would have the effect of increasing the deflection.  The combination though should lower the overall lateral deflection.

Final thought.  Even with a ridge beam, you can get lateral deflection of the walls, but to the inside of the structure, not the outside.  You compensate for this either by cutting a portion of the rafters flat for flat bearing on the wall top plate, or through the use of sloping rafter connectors as made by Simpson and like companies.

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Timber Roof Spread

Has anyone tried using the roof sheathing as diaphragms to support the roof? I'm just thinking out aloud, never tried it myself.
Obviously a steep roof pitch and appropriate room geometry would help.

RE: Timber Roof Spread

(OP)
Another idea I thought of was treating my wall as a laterally supported wall panel supported on 3 sides by the bottom slab support, and 2 buttressing walls.  

I've checked this panel with the lateral ud line load from the roof rafters applied to it, spread it over an acceptable width and it works structurally in accordance with normal wall panel design.  This should prevent my roof spread.

Thanks guys for the discussion.

RE: Timber Roof Spread

I'm not clear on how you are doing that.
What is resisting the lateral load at the top of the wall? Are the top plates? What is "normal wall panel design"? I have looked at walls supported on 3 sides but they need to have some bending capacity themselves. Usually, I am looking at a concrete wall fo rthis behavior (like a basement wall). What is it about the stud framed wall that gives it capacity to span horizontally?

RE: Timber Roof Spread

(OP)
Houseguy,

Firstly, the wall is supported on 2 sides by buttressing walls and on the bottom by the floor construction.
Secondly, the wall is constructed from masonry, not timber frame and therefore it has some bending moment capacity like a flat plate.  The design is in accordance with BS5628.

RE: Timber Roof Spread

My bad. I overlooked that in your OP.
What is the height and length of the CMU wall? I'd be curious about the horizontal deflection at the top of wall.
Has anyone used the roof sheathing as a diaphram to resist this thrust? It would be great if one could but I'd expect theoretical problems with spaced sheathing (H clips and all) as a diaphram along with other things like a possible lack of chords.

RE: Timber Roof Spread

(OP)
The wall height is approx 1200mm high and 4000mm long between butressing walls.

Haven't looked into using the roof sheathing as a diaphragm.

RE: Timber Roof Spread

Hello Damo74

I wondered if you had considered the use of a structural eaves beam to span 4m between the butresses to resist the horizontal thrust? This could probably be achieved in timber over that span, or a small RHS.

Another solution that I have used sucessfully over this sort of span is as suggested by apsix above by incorporating a ply-web beam within the depth of the roof construction to resist the axial loads in the rafters.

With your proposed solution to consider the panel as supported on three sides and subject ot a line load at eaves level, there is often difficulty in justifying the panel to work subject to lateral wind loads without the top restraint - this may not be a criteria for a panel with the geometry you have noted.

RE: Timber Roof Spread

(OP)
Thanks valleyboy.

Yes I had considered using an eaves beam but I was trying to avoid it.

My panel is working suuported on 3 sides with a line load.

But for future reference, the ply web beam sounds interesting.  However I don't know how it would be constructed or exactly in which plane it would be placed in.  Could you confirm?

RE: Timber Roof Spread

The ply-web beam solution is constructed within the depth of the rafters, between the wall plate and the point where the collar tie intersects the raters. The top and bottom boom are formed from noggins which run between the rafters. The upper compression boom is cut to tightly bear onto the face of each rafter, whilst the tension boom is connected to each rafter with a truss clip or similar engineered fixing to maintain continuity of the lower boom. Complete area of outer face has a ply covering before the battens are applied, and the inner face has a ply sheathing applied before the plasterboard soffitt cladding.

The ridge needs to be propped during construction, and the supports need to be robust enough to resist the reaction from the beam.

For your solution above, does your masonry panel work supported on three sides with external wind pressure and internal suction?

RE: Timber Roof Spread

(OP)
That's a good idea for future options valleyboy.  Thanks.

I've checked the masonry wall panel with external wind suction as this will give worst case loading when added to the outward roof spread.  This idea works fine.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources