Local jurisdictions require that safety factor calculations for static slope stability and infinite slope stability be based on residual, drained shear strength parameters obtained using a direct shear machine. I am consistently getting values for cohesion around 100 to 200 psf, and values for phi around 22 to 26 degrees, for well compacted fill materials (92% modified proctor) with fines contents ranging from 20 to 45 percent. Test samples are both in-situ (obtained from a hand-driven california drive), and remolded (to avoid potential disturbance). Use of these values will result in unsatisfactory safety factors for infinite stability and static stability of high 2:1 (h:v) slopes. Competitors seem to be reporting values up to 50% greater. Any suggestions on how to obtain more suitable (and economical) shear strength values (i.e. shear rate, normal load, sampling method, etc)?
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
A number of terms like “digitization”, “digital twin”, and “digital thread” have started to emerge in the product design world. While these terms have loose and varying definitions, the core ideas that underpin each of these concepts are becoming increasingly important to successful product development. Download Now
Over the past few years, there has been growing interest among industrial companies and solutions providers with regards to Product Innovation Platforms, where design, manufacturing and IoT tools are bundled into a single software package. Download Now