Local jurisdictions require that safety factor calculations for static slope stability and infinite slope stability be based on residual, drained shear strength parameters obtained using a direct shear machine. I am consistently getting values for cohesion around 100 to 200 psf, and values for phi around 22 to 26 degrees, for well compacted fill materials (92% modified proctor) with fines contents ranging from 20 to 45 percent. Test samples are both in-situ (obtained from a hand-driven california drive), and remolded (to avoid potential disturbance). Use of these values will result in unsatisfactory safety factors for infinite stability and static stability of high 2:1 (h:v) slopes. Competitors seem to be reporting values up to 50% greater. Any suggestions on how to obtain more suitable (and economical) shear strength values (i.e. shear rate, normal load, sampling method, etc)?
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, is quickly becoming an industry standard for product manufacturing in a variety of applications, including medical devices, aviation and aeronautics parts, and transportation components. Download Now
The growing complexity of automotive systems is putting a large amount of pressure on their designers. Industry constantly pushes to add new features for comfort, entertainment, and safety, requiring a single vehicle to use an increasing number of communicating electronic devices. Download Now
Fly by wire, remotely distributed control, remote and automated piloting, and augmented reality are a few evolutionary achievements in flight control and guidance that further remove the potential of human error in flight control systems. Download Now