×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Undamped Compression Spring Natural Frequency

Undamped Compression Spring Natural Frequency

Undamped Compression Spring Natural Frequency

(OP)
Hi everyone, bit of a debate going on amongst some mechanicals at my company and I thought I'd fish for some insight online.  With regards to the natural frequency of a spring (both ends fixed), I've encountered a company design guide that suggests a spring will resonate longitudinally at: [(2*wire_dia)/(PI*mean_dia^2*active_coils)]*sqrt[(modulus_rigidity*grav_const)/(32*density)].  So far I agree, in fact Shigley echoes this equation except that it makes the substitution of 9 ~= 2*PI*sqrt(2).  My issue is that the guide goes on suggest equivalence of this equation to the following: (1/(2*PI))*sqrt(spring_rate/weight_active).  I came across the eFunda derivation and it does not include the factor of PI in the denominator.  This makes sense to me because a real spring is a distributed mass whereas the standard resonance equation [nat_angular_freq = sqrt(stiffness/mass)] I see in many textbooks assumes a lumped mass and generally the spring mass is negligible relative to the sprung mass.  

Does anyone have any additional insight or perhaps an alternate derivation approach?  I have modeled a spring in ANSYS and I get a natural frequency consistent with 1/2 rather than 1/2*PI and corroborated this on the test bench.  I would like to contact the author of the design practice in order to have this document corrected, but would like to more thoroughly understand it such that I feel comfortable explaining to others.  Aside from the eFunda derivation, I was completely unable to find another suitable reference that goes into any level of detail.

http://www.efunda.com/DesignStandards/springs/spring_frequency.cfm

Regards,
Mike

RE: Undamped Compression Spring Natural Frequency

My assumption is that the PI is used when the frequency is in Hz. The PI is ommited when the frequency is in rad/sec. I am almost convinced that ANSYS gives the results in rad/sec.

RE: Undamped Compression Spring Natural Frequency

israelkk is correct.  ANSYS does give frequency in rad/sec. and the PI is used when looking for Hz.

RE: Undamped Compression Spring Natural Frequency

(OP)
wouldn't that be 2PI? that's just angular frequency

i did find another textbook that corroborates the "no pi" equation...3rd edition of Machine Design by Norton...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources