×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Smokeless flare with compressed air supply

Smokeless flare with compressed air supply

Smokeless flare with compressed air supply

(OP)
I have read API STD 521 (5th edition). There is only one paragraph indicated about high pressure air for prevent smoke prevention.

After consult the flare vendor, almost all famous flare vendors commented that I can not meet Ringleman 1 for this design.

I realized that this approach is less common because compressed air is more expensive than steam. However, I would like to discuss with the one who have experience in this design. If it cannot meet Ringleman 1, why API committees add this paragraph in 5th edition?

Please comment.

RE: Smokeless flare with compressed air supply

Pan
There are a number of problems with compressed air as a smoke suppressant
- unlike steam it does not reduce the flame temperature so it is not as effective in slowing down the chemical action of producing carbon in the flame,
- in fact it speeds up combustion and increases the flame temperature so, to be effective, it needs a significant proportion of the stoichimetric quantity
- steam might be effective with around 0.4 kg of steam per kg of gas but air might need as much as 6 kg air per kg of gas to have an equivalent smoke suppressing effect,
- air injected at pressure will have a benefit because of the high velocity energy, but the cost of compressed air in quantity is prohibitive
- most air assisted flares are specially designed to use low pressure, high volume, fan-blown air rather than compressed air which minimizes the horsepower needed to move the air
documents like RP-521 include it because it is a possible technique, but the efficiency is poor and your specific case may just need a lot more air than is practical.

smile David

www.flareman.com

RE: Smokeless flare with compressed air supply

(OP)
David,

Thanks for your advice. I started with API 521 because, it changed from "recommended practice" to "standard" in 5th edition. In my case, there is no steam on platform. The compressed air concept was used several years before I got the work here.

API refers to the required air pressure ~7 barg. At first, I understand that this is fixed pressure for any flare gas rate the high pressure air will suck the air surround flare tip for complete combustion. However, a manufacturer advise me that I can varied the air pressure with the changed of flare gas and smokeless condition. It seems that 7 barg is maxmimum pressure. However, there is no information about the required minimum pressure.

Anyone who has expereince in this design, please comment advise me about engineering references for the subject.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources