×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

(OP)
In a compression-ignition Diesel cycle engine, what is the relationship between intake tract boost pressure and the required amount of crankshaft power to compress that amount of charge air in the cylinders?

I.E. What would the penalty be to BSFC if a turbodiesel engine operated steady-state at 15pisg instead of 5psig boost, assuming equal load, RPM, fueling, etc.

Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

Apart from friction, and depending a very small amount on unsymmetrical cam timing if present, you get it back as extra cylinder pressure on the power stroke.

Regards

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

(OP)
That was my instinctive opinion as well Pat; however, most in the diesel performance world have taken the opposite tack - insisting that more charge air = even more compression-stroke power requirement (causing power consumption to rise more quickly than potential power production).

Wouldn't the high(er) pressure charge air help fill the cylinders, providing more downward force on the pistons during the intake stroke?  That would be something of an offset, but perhaps insignificant considering the disparity in magnitude with actual combustion chamber power stroke pressures.

Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

Yes and with more o2 available then you can add more fuel to the mix. And more power.

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

Think "spring"! Not the season...

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

The pressure on the turbine side is approx. double the pressure on the compressor side.

So, the work gained during the intake stroke is about half of the work lost during the expelling stroke (due to the higher pressure on the turbine).

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

If there is sufficient oxygen available to consume all the fuel during the 5 psi. boost scenario you outlined expect to gain about 5% reduction in fuel consumption. This would be for an engine of 2-5liter displacement 4cycle. As the displacement is scaled upwards the gain is less significant. If the engine in question had the compression ratio raised to operate with a 5psi. ceiling then further gains would be realized.------Phil

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

(OP)
Phil - are you saying that increasing boost (ALL else being equal!) in a given engine load situation will lower fuel consumption (raise BSFC)?

globi5 - how do you surmise TIP is double compressor boost?

Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

You are rolling two seperate functions into 1.

More pressure resisting the compression stroke results with more pressure on the power stroke, not considering extra fuel.

More boost from a turbo (which is not the OP) requires more energy from the exhaust which results in higher exhaust manifold pressure and therefore higher piston blow down pressure.

 

Regards

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

xxxlr8r,
boost pressure = double manifold pressure is rather a rule of thumb.
It's not surprising though, both the compressor as well as the turbine have an adiabatic efficiency of roughly 70%. If one multiplies them, one ends up with an overall efficieny of 50% or less.

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

(OP)
... then how would you explain typical empirical TIP/boost ratio observations in the .95-1.15 range?  (excepting ratios approaching 1.6 when you run the turbo off the edge of it's map)

Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

Can you please provide a link to that typical empirical data?

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

Any given pump requires more power the higher the flow.

Why would a given engine pumping more air without burning it require less power as the exact same engine pumping less air but burning all?

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

I don't know if I can buy the 70% time 70% gets 50% thing.  I ran a turbo similation and at 2750 lb/hr air (636 cfm) it takes 50 HP to get 15 psig boost.  With 3000 lbs/ hr exhaust at 900F in order to make 51 HP to drive the turbo, the inlet pressure is 16 psig.  These all had .5 psi inlet and exhaust pressure drops for the piping.

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

(OP)
globi5 - these are ubiquitous pressure readings from the post charge-air cooler intake tract and pre-turbine exhaust manifold on turbodiesels... confirmed many times over at every dyno session, dragstrip and sledpulling track.

I agree that as a compressor's pumping performance rises, the turbine's power requirement also increases.  However, I don't understand where that "rule of thumb" came about...  I don't think we could double TIP in relation to boost w/o destroying the charger!   
As the compressor approaches an edge of it's efficiency map, every additonal psi of boost requires an ever-increasing amount of drive pressure... is that what you were getting at?

dcasto - what turbocharger parameters did you input?
Your simulation is fairly close to an observed 50% steady-state load.

Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

I set the expander at 70% isentropic effiency and the compressor at 70% polytropic effiency.

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

(OP)
Oh!

- I was thinking more in terms of housing A/Rs and wheel trims...

Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

Sorry, the rule of thumb came from a gasoline engine (much lower compression and roughly constant a/f ratio).

Can you plot TIP/boost-ratio in relation to the boost pressure?


RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

XXXLR8R, I only do the thermal calcs.  The turbos I work with are industrial engines and in cryogenic service, thermodydamics are the same.

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

(OP)
globi5 - yes, for specific turbochargers... i.e. Holset HE351 on 5.9L CTD:

0-5 psig boost = 3+ psig TIP
5-10 "    "    = 4+  "    "
10-15 "   "    = 5+  "    "
15-20 "   "    = 7+  "    "
20-25 "   "    = 9+  "    "
25-30 "   "    = 11+ "    "
30-35 "   "    = 13+ "    "
35-40 "   "    = 16+ "    "
40-45 "   "    = 20+ "    "
45-50 "   "    = 25+ "    "

More fuel, more gear or more track would likely grenade the turbo on that curve's progressive rise.

Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

XXXLR8R, I agree with all your statements, but your data is a little confusing.  Are you saying this turbo is getting 50psig boost with 25 psig TIP?  That's much better than I've seen or would expect.

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

(OP)
Goodness no!

'Tis the other way 'round - 1st coloumn is compressor boost range, 2nd coloumn is additional TIP required over & above 1:1 ratio.

Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement


      I have some experimental data for a turbocharged non-EGR diesel engine.

      At some engine conditions, intake pressure could be as much as 14 inches of mercury higher than exhaust pressure.

      At "worst" engine conditions,  intake pressure was 2 inches of mercury lower than exhaust pressure.


       You can make the pressure ratio across the turbine very low by making turbine inlet temperature very high (provided nothing melts).    If the pressure ratio across the turbine is low,  then exhaust pressure is low.


j2bprometheus

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

I agree with j2bprometheus.  I've run many turbocharged engine tests with numerous engine - turbocharger combinations and various ambient conditions.  Engine delta P (P int man - P exh man) can vary significantly.  Most notable I've seen is 30 in abs Hg intake manifold with 18 in abs Hg exhaust manifold and turbine inlet temp of 1900 F.

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

I've seen TIP's lower than boost pressure in modelling, actual data, and even on my own vehicle, under certain limited conditions.  Nothing magical, it just depends on the turbo match, net turbocharger efficiency, and the operating point.

RE: Intake Boost vs. Compressive Power Requirement

XXXLR8R If the engine in question is using .35 lbs/hp/hr at 15psi boost expect to see .323 lbs/hp/hr at 5psi boost if you can achieve total combustion of fuel need at this power level. I have had some limited experience with diesel engines in the displacement range descrbed in earlier post to report this finding. I believe that decreased power draw needed to run compressor, ( decreased exhaust pressure) and decreased heat rejection within the combustion chamber are responsible for the net gain observed.------Phil

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources