×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Small gear - 8620 core hardness concerns warranted?

Small gear - 8620 core hardness concerns warranted?

Small gear - 8620 core hardness concerns warranted?

(OP)
Have run into a rash of gear failures on a small gear (.06 tooth thickness approx.) that for years did not have any issues.

Current spec is 89-91 R15N effective depth of .008-.014. Core hardness 35-45 Rc. Measure at pitch line.

The gears are currently always coming on the high end on the core hardness. I am checking to see if this was always the case. Regardless, is this the right investigative road to travel down?

Also, isn't the core hard hardness just a by-product of the temper before the carbururuzing process or are there significant controls with the process that dictate the final core hardness.

Not a metallurgist ... just a guy with way to many metallurgy issues. Thanks for any comment.

BCK

RE: Small gear - 8620 core hardness concerns warranted?

You will need to get a copy of the mill certification for the 8620 material. A gear of this size can easily core harden into the mid 40's HRC.

Gear tooth pitchline core hardness is associated with carbon content/overall chemistry, hardenability, temperature prior to quenching, quench media, quench temperature, and draw (tempering) temperature.

I would start with the material though. See if you can write an internal spec for a restricted hardenability 8620H with the near surface hardness properties (J1 and J2 jominy hardenability position) below 45 HRC.

RE: Small gear - 8620 core hardness concerns warranted?

You first need to have a competent metallurgical engineer perform a failure analysis on the failed gears in order to find root cause. It may or may not have anything to do with your material or processing.

RE: Small gear - 8620 core hardness concerns warranted?

I went straight to the specs and overlooked the part of your post with regard to the investigation, swall is correct as far as the very first thing to do. If in fact material or heat treat is a factor you may wish to look into the specs.

But the met analysis will tell you if it was an overload, instantaneous, or fatigue type of fracture; it may also point out irregularities in machining or finishing. I've seen many gears that met specs yet did not perform in service. The metallurgist's conclusion will tell you what data you have to gather.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources