×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet
4

Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

(OP)
Any expert please advise, in accordance with BS 5950-1:2000,  whether purlins supporting ordinary metal roofing sheets is considered adequately restrained to its compression flange so that no lateral torsional buckling check is required. Thank you!!

RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

Not familiar with the British standard, but this is the typical roof system in Australia.  It is complex, and engineers here generally depend on published tables.  Bridging members are used between the purlins, and these have been shown by full scale testing to provide support for the flanges.  For the top flange, most of the bracing is by the sheeting which is screwed to the purlins, and for the bottom flange, all of the bracing is by the bridging.

RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

(OP)
TQ Hokie66 for your response. If I read and understand corrctly, according to your practice in Australia, the top flange is considered adequtely restrained but however the bottom flange which will be in compression under wind suction is to be restrained by other mean. We normally use sag rod.

RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

Yes, the sheeting restrains the top flange.
Sag rods are not commonly used in Australia, although I believe they were in the past.  The bridging used now consists of light gauge channels, with connections near the top and bottom of the purlins.  These are proprietary items, and differ a bit from manufacturer to manufacturer.

RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

(OP)
Hi Hokie66,
Can u please give me the website where I can look at the proprietary bridging proudct. Thank you!!

RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

Heres one more appropriate to the UK.

http://www.kingspanstructural.com/multibeam/rp/index.htm

I think you will find that the load tables for most purlin manufacturers are based on the use of their proprietary bridgings - sag rods just are not sufficient as they do not provide torsional restraint.

csd

RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

With a screw down metal roof deck the purlins would be considered fully braced.

Don't forget that for the net uplift pressure on the purlins they would be fully unbraced unless supplementary bracing is provided.

RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

csd,

Interesting site.  UK take on purlins is certainly different.  But I couldn't see any bridging which looks like it would brace the bottom flange.

MarchSE,

That is correct.  That is the purpose of the bridging we are discussing.


RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

(OP)
csd, I couldn't find the bridging details as brought up by hokie66!!

hokie66, can u find any website for any proprietary bridging details being used in Australia?

Thanks!!!

RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

2

Have a look at the following website.

http://www.bluescopesteel.com.au/go/product/lysaght-zed-and-cee-purlins-and-girts

Go to Lysaght zed & cee purlins & girts user manual (top RH corner) & hit the download key (not for the cee purlin C7510 manual).

Sag rods are sometimes used with wall girts & usually with connections over the ridge (see manual).

I designed a 50,000 m2 roof (15 odd years ago) & a part of the speci was to test two complete bays of roofing for dead loading (down) & suction (wind loading) up.  The results (then) indicated that sag rods for roof purlins were not sufficient to prevent torsional distress.

There has been several large scale tests done since then, that have only verified the original conclusions.  I think that all of the purlin manufacturers in Oz, base their safe load tables on similar testing.  However, there has been a lot of theoretical analysis (I understand) to confirm the testing data.

The roof sheeting is generally a ridge fixing (valley fixing in rare cases) with some flexibility from the tilt of the fixings subject to a lateral loading.  However, testing has indicated that, at failure, this tilt is only a consideration in the very early stages of loading (movement) of the sheeting.  The fixing of the sheeting generally creates sufficient friction (sheeting to purlin) to allow an effective lateral restraint of the purlin flange at the design loading.

RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

I meant to mention - as hokie66 said above, the whole reason for the bridging, is to ensure that the purlin deflects vertically under ALL types of loading.

If the bridging does not keep the purlin vertical, the deflection distortion is a torsional rotation (due to the fact that the purlin is not axisymetric such as an I section) with a very large reduction in the (effective) I & Z value of the purlin, with a consequent reduction in load carrying capacity.  A tie rod cannot develop this type of torsional restraint.

Essentially, bridging is also req'd for C sections but for a different reason.  If the C is loaded by the sheeting on the top flange, the loading is (generally) directed thru the neutral axis & NOT thru the shear centre of the C section.  The load mutiplied by the distance to the shear centre, will create a torsional moment that will result in a rotation of the C section (under loading).  This rotation will result in a reduction in the effective I & Z values.

All of the above conclusions, have been verified by both theoretical studies & testing of 'real life' structures - usually by purlin manufacturers.

RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

For the development of the purlin safe load tables in Oz, read page 3 of the zed & cee purlin manual (mentioned in the thread above) "Introduction - background"

RE: Design of Purlins with metal Roofing Sheet

dcnng,

Sorry I didn't get back to you, but Barry has done a better job than I would have anyway.

We commonly use zed sections for roof purlins, as they can be lapped at supports, thus making more efficient use of the material where the moments are greatest.  The top flange goes up the slope, thus the vertical component of load is applied near the shear centre.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources