100 amp low voltage power source
100 amp low voltage power source
(OP)
I'm looking for a low dollar method to provide 100 plus amps, either AC or DC, probably for an extended period, to test some bolted connections' resistances. With the connection likely having a small fraction of an ohm resistance I think I don't need more than a volt or 2.
I've been thinking of tranformers or one of those 6 volt car battery with the external series connector links cut and run in parallel.
I bet many of you have much more clever ways to accomplish this.
Thanks,
Dan T
I've been thinking of tranformers or one of those 6 volt car battery with the external series connector links cut and run in parallel.
I bet many of you have much more clever ways to accomplish this.
Thanks,
Dan T






RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
respectfully
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
I recently picked up an Agilent 6681A 8V 580A DC power supply for £750 if the DC route is more appealing. It is 'transportable' rather than 'portable' at over 50kg, if that is a factor.
----------------------------------
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
There are low resistiance tests sets available for rent that are designed to measure resistance of high-ampacity, low-resistance bolted connections. (Biddle's -Digital Low Resistance Ohmeter - DLRO is one unit.) They read directly in micorohms or milliohms by pushing 10A or 100A DC current through the connection, measuring the millivolt drop and calculating the connection resistance. The portable tst sets are momentary units and cannot be used to heat up a connection with a continuous current.
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
I would not expect a bolted connection to exhibit much induction but if it did I may be more interested in the impedance than just the resistance. Also, the impedance will always be equal or greater than the resistance so if it passes an AC test (based on voltage drop across the joint under test) it should also pass the DC test. Granted, in many instances such as motor or transformer windings the difference between a DC test and an AC test is considerable.
respectfully
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
Were you refering to the .707 differenced in hipot testing with AC vs DC? That makes sense to me, since it is the voltage that stresses the insulation, and an AC signal is briefly 1.4X the nominal voltage.
In my test the insulation is of no concern. We just need to be sure the joint/contact resistance is low and stays low.
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
I was referring to the difference between impedance and resistance. In a motor or transformer winding there is a significant difference between resistance and impedance.
An AC test will measure impedance, a DC test will measure resistance.
Impedance (Z) = (R^2 + X^2)^.5
Resistance = R
Reactance = X
A bolted joint is not expected to display reactance so the impedance should equal the resistance.
respectfully
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
Buy a 200VA, 120VAC to 1VAC transformer and feed it with a variac. Might be cheaper than the CT.
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
----------------------------------
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
That's why we are pursuing the big amp power source.
The technical leader just upped the ante, to ~1000 amps, for a many hours. (!!)
Considering I (a short timer) had not heard anyone mention aggressively testing our joints before I started whining about it, this is in some ways a surprising development.
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
I've successfully used the big DC supply to measure the resistance of the 2500A conductor on a 275kV bushing at the request of the manufacturer and I needed every amp I could throw at it. They were demanding 10nΩ precision to give us a go / no-go on a brazed joint which had failed on one of the other bushings from the batch - easy in their test facility with a 7.5 digit meter, a stable temperature, and a huge DC source, but bloody hard with the bushing on the transformer!
----------------------------------
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
The gist of the article is that there can be sizable inaccuracies hidden in the AC millivolt drop test due to the unmeasured power factor components. A relatively small increase in the total millivolt drop may be entirely due to a significant change in the resistive component of the measurement.
In other words, mV drop readings of 130, 150 and 130 may have within them resistive components of 15, 35 and 15 micro-ohms resistance, and this might be overlooked instead of investigated and corrected.
old field guy
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
Thanks for the heads up on the thermal voltages. Am I correct in surmising that the thermal voltages will reflect the difference between the temperature of the joint and the temperature of the meter?
Respectfully
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
If you are trying to decide if a new connection design will carry 1000 amps AC in your machine, running 1,000A AC through the joint and monitoring temperatures with thermocouples or infrared would give better data.
The micro-ohmeter check we used was always to verify the condition of a joint or a contact in a system whose design had been proven. We were just checking the quality of the installation or the condiiton of some aged equipment. (Examples- checking intercell connections on battery banks, contact resistance on disconnect switches, bolted joint connections on smaller bus bar.)
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
It really comes down to understanding the item you are testing and picking the appropriate test method. It is certainly possible to get erroneous results though poor choice of test method.
rcwilson,
Can I add to your excellent question 'Why are we testing' some others: 'What exactly are we testing' and 'How accurate do you need the results'. The latter inevitably leads to a third question, 'How much are you prepared to pay for that accuracy'?
waross,
The thermal EMFs occur due to the thermocouple effect of dissimilar metals in contact where the test probes meet the object being measured, where the probes meet the test leads, where the leads meet the instrument, etc. A few microvolts of thermal EMF causes havoc when it is large percentage of the volt-drop you are looking for! Good commercial micro-ohm meters use an automatic technique where the voltage probe connection is reversed during the test so the thermal EMF cancels when the two readings are averaged. Home-built test rigs for special or awkward jobs don't have the luxury of this feature so it has to be done manually.
----------------------------------
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
Roy
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
Did you read any of this thread?
----------------------------------
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
Then why are you still reading it? I fail to see how using a low burden CT can be any more accurate, surely you would be doing a Drop Test . I agree if you kept the leads real short and voltage very low a CT would work but surely the core will saturate fairly quickly. I have used the method I proposed to test switchgear trips up to and over 1KA.
Yes I did read the previous old posts, lots of people do, to get ideas, otherwise they would be taken off after a few days.
Regards
Roy
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
Who mentioned a low burden CT?
A typical Class X CT is capable of producing some fairly large voltages at currents considerably in excess of the nominal secondary current rating. It isn't uncommon to find them with a kneepoint voltage of 800V or so, which means they will connect directly to a voltage source up to (say) 415V in the UK or 480V in the US. I have one which needs either a fork lift or four men to lift, to give some idea of scale. In the mode of use Bill and I suggested the CT is behaving just like a voltage transformer, but is physically more amenable to having a few turns of heavy cable or bar looped through the aperture.
There really isn't any difference in what we are proposing other than the hassle of chopping the secondary windings out of a power transformer varies between time consuming to outright difficult. We have successfully got over 5kA out of the protection CT mentioned earlier which was rescued from a transformer bushing. We were driving it from a large 415V variac and could have gotten a fair bit more than 5kA if we had wanted to. You are right about keeping the connections short and thick, but this applies to any transformer based solution unless it involves a very high power source capable of delivering a lot of voltage at high current. If you look back in the old threads this type of high energy test has been done a couple of times to carry out primary injection on a large transformer's protection scheme - the last one I was involved with used a 1250kVA generator with the load directly strung across two phases.
----------------------------------
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
The original request was for a low dollar solution. Your CT sounds awesome, unlike anything I have seen lying around spare. I was picturing something 500:5 or there-about. Either way I think we agree a transformer is more practical than a DC solution for a long term test. My experience was testing low voltage switchgear where the client insisted on testing the protection by injecting through the busbars to verify CT wiring. The usual low current test set was useless for that. An old 1KVA trany, hacksaw, welding cable and a couple of hours later we had a workable low cost (Kiwi) solution.
Cheers
Roy
RE: 100 amp low voltage power source
----------------------------------
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!