×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rainflow anaysis subsampling

Rainflow anaysis subsampling

Rainflow anaysis subsampling

(OP)
Hi,
I am running a rainflow analysis on some data sampled on a suspension component to help predict the life of the structure.  The results from the rainflow analysis is scaled to give component stress (linear relationship assumed) and then using Miner's rule the life of the component is determined.  I am however getting some strange results.
The data recorded was sampled along with other channels at a frequency of 5kHz.  As this is a much higher frequency than required, I sub-sampled the data to 500Hz (taking every 10th point).  I have run both these data through the rainflow analysis and Miner's rule, and get results showing that the sub-sampled data gives a component life ten times worse than the full data set.

Has anyone any possible explainations for this?  I could understand the other way as the high frequency noise could have a large effect, but this has got me baffled.  Obviously it has large implications for the structure!

Many Thanks

Jim

RE: Rainflow anaysis subsampling

how much of the intermediate steps can you see ?

do you feed the data in at one end of the balck box, and out pops the life ?

or can you see the rainflow spectrum ?  if you can, you can see the difference between the two spectra.

on the face of it, the higher frequency sampled spectrum includes more turning points, producing smaller cycles.  that would indicate that your signal (input) hasa higher frequency than you expect.  could you have data issues too ? (like alaising?)

RE: Rainflow anaysis subsampling

(OP)
I understand what you say regarding the sample rate vs event time etc.  We work with a standard of 11ms (I've no idea why 11 and not 10) minimum duration of a load for damage to occur.  This would suggest a minimum sample rate of 100hz and hence why the 5kHz was reduced to 500Hz.  I admit a filtration process would have been better, but I have not carried that out yet and am just trying to understand the results I have at present!
RB - I cannot see any of the intermediate steps from the sampled input data to the rainflow output (i.e. the range and number of cycles for all found cycles), but can see all the other steps.   I have a program to sort the cycles into 100 range bins, and then an excel spreadsheet to carry out the Miner's rule calculation.
Having looked into the results more now, the main difference between the raw and sub-sampled data once sorted in bins is an increase in the maximum cycle (approx 50% higher) and a huge increase (10 times) in the quantity of cycles in the first bin.

Thinking and talking about it whilst writing this, I think I can see how missing data can cause larger cycles, but did not think that this would outweigh the overall decrease in total number of cycles (although I can see that with fatigue it is a log relationship)

Overall I guess the things that I want to find out are: a) Is the characteristic I have of the sub-sampling making the fatigue life worse a rule with rainflow analysis, or just something that needs to be checked for; b) Is a higher sampling rate always better and c)which data should I use for my life predictions.

Many thanks so far.

Cheers

Jim

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources