×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Grade Beams, Drilled Shafts and Expansive Clay
3

Grade Beams, Drilled Shafts and Expansive Clay

Grade Beams, Drilled Shafts and Expansive Clay

(OP)
I have a site with 16" wide x 24" deep grade beams supported at 16'-0" on 30" diameter drilled piers that bear at about 10 ft deep with a 60" bell. This is an expansive site so there are 8" void forms under all the grade beams and the structural slab at ground level. The slab will be cast integrally with the grade beams.

When designing the reinforcing for the grade beams, how is the stiffness of the drilled shafts modeled? On page 6-16 here:

http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_220_07.pdf

It says: "Steel is recommended in only the bottom of the grade beam if grade beams are supported by drilled shafts above the void space."

Which I do not understand the logic behind at all. There should be significant negative moments in the grade beams that are continuous over the drilled shafts.

So that was my first confusion. Next, I have designed several elevated concrete slab systems before, but I am not sure how to include the drilled shafts in the moment distribution model. It would seem that they are more stiff than typical concrete columns since they are surrounded by the passive pressure of the soil, with a point of fixity at some location below grade. So what is the assumption for distributing the moments into the shafts from the grade beams? I plan on having dowels connect the shafts to the grade beams, so the beams are not just "resting" on top of the shafts.




RE: Grade Beams, Drilled Shafts and Expansive Clay

(OP)
And the 16ft shaft spacing is just an average. Some of my spans go 23ft-10ft-23ft with skipped 100psf live load.

RE: Grade Beams, Drilled Shafts and Expansive Clay

I would neglect the bored pile stiffness, just assume they are pinned supports.  Conservative, but that is the way I do it.  As to the recommendation about only bottom steel, that makes no sense.  And if you look at the details a little further on in the paper, they show top bars.  

RE: Grade Beams, Drilled Shafts and Expansive Clay

I always use both top and bottom steel, but I try to avoid shear ties if at all possible (may not be possible in a seismic zone). I have added additional top reo or deepened the footing just to achieve this.

csd

RE: Grade Beams, Drilled Shafts and Expansive Clay

hokie66 beat me to it.  same comments from me.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources