×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Spread footer or pad under footer for wall point loads
2

Spread footer or pad under footer for wall point loads

Spread footer or pad under footer for wall point loads

(OP)
I am working with an architect here in central Florida who insists on using large reinforced concrete pads under standard 12"x20" monolithic footers for high point loads on exterior CMU walls. Vertical reinforcement is provided between the bond beam and footer - 3,000 PSI concrete filled cells with(1)#5 rebar for each 5,000 lbs of reaction load. The vertical reinforcement is extended down into the pad.

I am accustomed to using spread/bell footers under the point loads with the width determined by the magnitude of the point load and the depth at the standard 20". The load bearing capacity of our sandy soils is typically 1,500 to 2,000 PSF, but tests are seldom done to verify the capacity for residential construction.

Any thoughts that you have regarding the need for a pad under the standard footer vs just spreading the width of the footer would be appreciated.

RE: Spread footer or pad under footer for wall point loads

Normally, the strip footing is enlarged to take care of the additional load if the strip footing cannot handle it.  What the Architect is describing is used in an underpinning situation where the strip footing is already poured and the capacity of the strip footing is insufficient to take the load. Such is not the case here.

What he wants to do is also requiring two separate pours - more expensive and time consuming for the contractor and owner.

I would politely tell the Architect to do the architecture and let you do the structural engineering.  That's the expertise he is paying you for.  He should listen to the advice if he is smart.  I know.  I'm asking for the moon.

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Spread footer or pad under footer for wall point loads

With strip footings and spread footings in sandy soils, it is generally better to have them all founded in pretty much the same horizontal plane.  So I think it preferable both for structural reasons and for constructability to cast the enlargement monolithically with the strip footing.

RE: Spread footer or pad under footer for wall point loads

Larryjordan,

You have not mentioned, why the architect is asking you to provide this enlarged pad?

 

RE: Spread footer or pad under footer for wall point loads

Tell them that is okay as long as you get some input into their architectural decisions!

csd

RE: Spread footer or pad under footer for wall point loads

Spend more effort in compacting the sands under your foundations.  Couple of hours with vibrating plate or vibrating roller will be more effective than adding a reinforced mud slab for sub-foundation. Do your really use concrete to fill the cells?  What methods do you use for concrete filling?

RE: Spread footer or pad under footer for wall point loads

(OP)
Regarding soil compaction: we do call for 95% compaction beneath footers as well as slabs on grade. However, the engineer is not involved in construction of the homes. I doubt the builders do anything other than drive their trucks and equipment over the soil before they start to dig the footers. The county inspectors don't do their first inspection until the footers are dug.

Regarding filled cells: In the 110 MPH wind load areas (most of central Florida), we call for: Vertical reinforcement 6’ o.c. max, 3000 psi conc, (1) #5 w/10” std hook, 25” min overlap from footer to bond beam and located at all corners, openings, beams, and girders.

RE: Spread footer or pad under footer for wall point loads

I wasn't too clear on just what you're saying.  You're saying the architect wants you to use a concentric spread footing under the thickened edge monolithic footing, top of the spread ftg at the bottom of the thickened edge?  What is it you normally spec?  The bell footing sounds normal for central Florida (I'm there too) but I'm not clear on what you are describing for the other case.

RE: Spread footer or pad under footer for wall point loads

(OP)
See attached diagram (Uploaded)of the pad-under-footer design at:
http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=7757f5c5-2dd3-4b2e-8d50-1aa00d6cda83&file=Footer - Pad Under Footer.jpg

My concern is that a lot of the point load is distributed to the regular 12"x20" footer rather than the pad beneath. I like the pad design when it is used as a stiffner under a floor slab to aupport a column because there is no footer that absorbs the load.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources