×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Generator Transient & Subtransient Reactance

Generator Transient & Subtransient Reactance

Generator Transient & Subtransient Reactance

(OP)
When calculating fault currents for a generator (400 volt 1250kva for example), I thought that we would use the subtransient reactance, X"d.  However, I have just read a paper on short circuit currents that states "for salient pole alternators, subtransient reactance is negligible".
Can anyone explain what this might mean?

RE: Generator Transient & Subtransient Reactance

Never heard such a thing.  For an accurate model of a salient pole machine you need both Xd'' and Xq''.  Both are significant and Xq'' will be smaller than Xd''.  The effective X'' is the average of the two.  Is it possible that your quote is somehow taken out of context?  If not, I wouldn't put much stock in the paper.

RE: Generator Transient & Subtransient Reactance

Negligible = very small = big effect on short circuit current?

RE: Generator Transient & Subtransient Reactance

I agree with David. "Negligible" has no meaning in that context.

RE: Generator Transient & Subtransient Reactance

(OP)
Here's a little more information from the paper.  I could post the whole document, but I don't know if that would be "allowable" as it would identify the author.
Anyway, this method would indicate short-circuit levels to be unrealistically low - or am I missing something?

RE: Generator Transient & Subtransient Reactance

Well, ain't that strange?  That's the first calculation for generator fault I've ever seen that ignores subtransient and only uses the transient reactances.

RE: Generator Transient & Subtransient Reactance

Some info from IEEE Std 141:

IEEE Std 141 (Red Book) gives typical Xd'' & Xd' values for Salient pole as well as Turbo-machines. Refer Annexure 4A. There is also a note there indicating that Xd' for Salient pole machines is not normally used in Short circuit calculations.
The Xd'' values for Turbo-machines and Salient pole machines are in the range 9-15% and 16-21% respectively. Corresponding Xd' values are 15-23% for Turbo-machines and 33% for Salient pole machines.

RE: Generator Transient & Subtransient Reactance

There is one more issue, in this regard. That is, when we are calculating SC currents for the purpose of overcurrent relay coordination, it is customary to consider transient reactance of generator, irrespective of whether Salient pole or wound rotor one.
This is because the subtransient stage in generators would not last for more than 100ms (or 5cycles).
Hope you find it useful.

RE: Generator Transient & Subtransient Reactance

Equipment withstand ratings must be based on subtransient reactances.  Anything that might have an instantaneous trip characteristic must also be evaluated based on subtransient reactances.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources