×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

impact of sphere on water

impact of sphere on water

impact of sphere on water

(OP)
Does anyone know how I can calculate the impact force/energy of a sphere falling onto a fluid?

I know the geometry and mass of the ball, the height it has fallen (so can calculate a velocity at impact), and i know the properties of the fluid its being dropped onto.

the real life situation is a frac ball being dropped down drill pipe when the mud level in the drill pipe is about 150m below drill floor.  I am trying to calculate, knowing the impact strength in ft-lb/in of the ball, whether this would be enough to fracture the ball.

RE: impact of sphere on water

The ball will have a kinetic energy of

KE = 0.5 * m * v^2

If it's moving pretty fast into a confined liquid, it's almost like hitting concrete, so you might be able to neglect any complex fluid calculations if you're just looking for the worst case.  The impact strength is just how much energy can be imparted to the material in an impact, per unit of thickness, before it breaks.

Is it a hollow ball?

Don
Kansas City

RE: impact of sphere on water

(OP)
Thanks for the input Don.

Yes, I suppose to go down the road of complex fluid calcs may be overthinking things a bit.

The ball is solid.  It is 2-1/4" dia. made of phenolic plastic with a metalic filler.  specific gravity of 3.4, so it weighs around 0.3 kg.  I don't know the exact co-ef. of drag for it, so terminal velocity when it hit the mud could have been anywhere between 50 - 150 m/sec according to my rough calcs.

So if:

E = 1/2 m v^2 = .5 x .3 x 50^2 = 375 J
thickness = ball dia. = 0.057 m
impact energy = aprox 6580 J/m

The limit of the material is 0.5 ft-lb/in
1 ft-lb/in = 53.4 J/m, so 0.5 ft-lb/in = 26.7 J/m.

So we've exceeded the impact strength by a factor of about 250.  This seems excessive (but agrees with what I'm trying to prove, so I'll take it).

Any more thoughts?

RE: impact of sphere on water

Terminal velocity of the ball falling through air inside of the pipe comes to mind. Also what is the inside diameter of the pipe? You may never achieve a very high velocity.

RE: impact of sphere on water

p.s. Since terminal velocity of the sphere is a function of the fluid density it would be important to use the right air density. Is the air inside of the drill pipe at atmospheric pressure, or something higher?

RE: impact of sphere on water

craig, i think your calc is way too conservative ... you're dealing with the transfer of energy from the ball to the fluid, the ball may well be approximated as rigid, but how will the fluid flow ?  is it constrained within the pipe ? (btw, i agree with dvd's comment above, about the air trapped inside the pipe (under the ball) increasing the drag of the ball ... try Hoerner "Fluid Dynamic Drag" for a solution for a ball falling down a pipe).  btw, i've never seen the strength of a material dimensioned your way ... ft.lbs/in is (dimensionally) equivalent to lbf.  if you could you might try non-linear FE.

RE: impact of sphere on water

Your 50 m/sec is way too high. That is Indianapolis raceway speed.
Do the terminal velocity in free air to get a much smaller conservative term velocity;moreover, being inside a pipe would be much less.

RE: impact of sphere on water

(OP)
The terminal velocity did seem a bit high to me, but hey... it came from NASA.

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/termv.html

on the calculator there i used mass = 0.332 kg, CSA = 0.0026, altitude = 114m, drag coeff. = 0.5 (just looked this up as a typical [high] value for a sphere)

I suppose they're used to objects travelling a bit faster than small plastic balls in drillpipe though, so not necessarily to be trusted....

The drillpipe ID is about 4-3/4 inches.

RE: impact of sphere on water

one mistake i can is (i think) that the mass of the ball isn't 0.3kg (that'd be its weight) but 0.03kgm.

v=sqrt(2gh) is the maximum possible velocity (no drag)
 =47 m/sec

including drag ...

mgh = 0.5mv^2+(Cd*0.5rhov^2*CSA)*v

2gh = v^2(1+Cd*rho*CSA*v/m)

if v = 47m/sec the () term is 1+0.5*1.225*0.0026*47/0.03) = 3.5

correct v ... v = sqrt(2*9.8*114/3.5) = 47/sqrt(3.5) = 25m/sec

correct () ... = 2.33
correct v ... = 31m/sec
correct () ... = 2.64
correct v ... = 29 m/sec ...

converging on 30 m/sec

there looks as tho' there's plenty of room in the pipe for the ball (2.25" dia in 4.75" dia pipe) ... still how can the fluid react to the impact ?

RE: impact of sphere on water

It's not going to behave like free fall.  The faster it falls, the harder it is for the air to squeeze by it as it passes through the pipe.  It's like an elevator falling down a shaft: pressure builds up under the ball and needs to get around it as it falls.

This whole thing is starting to appear to me like one of those cases where you could waste a colossal amount of time (which is money) on assumptions and complex calculations and still not get it right.  Can't you just drop one of these balls down the chute and see if it breaks? How much does the ball cost?

Don
Kansas City

RE: impact of sphere on water

Didn't Barnes Wallis spend a lot of time on this kind of thing.

Don't know if there'd be any publications, also it wouldn't address the fact it's in a tube.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: impact of sphere on water

an elevator is a much closer fit in its shaft than this ball (the tube dia is more than twice the ball dia.).

barnes wallis also spun his bomb (to get it to skip).

RE: impact of sphere on water

Still reckon the test example would be a good option, you could spend a long time dissapearing up your own arse trying to derive that theoretical answer to this problem, or just chuck it down the pipe!!
One question though, why are you doing it??

RE: impact of sphere on water

Yeah he span it and he had horizontal velocity but it was the closest thing I could think of.

I remember in the film "Dambusters" that his early prototypes would break up on impact so I thought there may be some related info.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: impact of sphere on water

A 5 minute google comes up with a greate deal of semi-related information about this topic , without answering it (in a very limited look).
I would like the OP to give the reaason for dropping the ball down the hole and more details on the whole thing.
We could speculate about it, but at the end of the day, all we know is that somebody wants to drop a ball down a hole in the mud.
If the sphere has to be intact upon impact then you can design it to be by picking the worst case if needs be, but without more specifics, then you end up arguing about semantics.


RE: impact of sphere on water

rb157
quote "mgh = 0.5mv^2+(Cd*0.5rhov^2*CSA)*v"

Where did you get that one?

zeke

RE: impact of sphere on water

(OP)
rb1957 - the mass is 0.3 kg (i.e. the product of it's density and volume).  It's weight would be that value multiplied by gravitational acceleration, no?

to explain a bit more history, this ball is used in a tool which is run down into the well.  fluid is initially circulated through the tool to wash out the landing area, then when the tool is landed, the ball is dropped down the hole, which blocks a port and allows pressure to be built up.  this pressure then shears a pin which opens a port and allows pressure to energise the tool.  it sounds a bit daft but it's a field proven tool which has worked great for years and similar designs are used across the industry.

ordinarily the ball would be dropped in and the pipe would be full of fluid right up to the drill floor.  in this instance due to the additives which had recently been put in the drilling mud, the fluid level was about 115m below the drill floor when the ball was dropped in.

when the ball went in, they waited the 10 minutes or so for it to land (1500m down to the seabed) then pressured the tool but couldnt build pressure to function the tool.  when it was recovered to surface, the ball had fragmented.

essentially what i'm trying to prove is that what caused the ball to fracture was the impact on the fluid after a 115m free-fall, rather than any malfunction inside the tool.

RE: impact of sphere on water

craig83,
"... so it weighs around 0.3 kg", your post 12th (@ 11.07)
i assumed you meant kgf

dia = 2.25", volume = 5.95in3 = 98cc
a liter of water weighs 1kgf, so your ball weighs about 0.3kgf, and its mass is about 0.03kgm.

zekeman,
potential energy = kinetic energy + energy lost overcoming drag (=DV)

RE: impact of sphere on water

Water has a density of 997 kg/m^3.  Therefore, a volume of 97.7 cc of water must have mass of 97.4 gm.  with a specific gravity of 3.4, its mass is therefore 0.33 kg.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: impact of sphere on water

rb1957, what planet are you on?  smile

One kgm weighs 1kgf here on earth where g=9.81.  Sounds like you're on some planet with a gravitational constant 10 times that... blllttt

RE: impact of sphere on water

rb1957,
You can't use the terminal drag force for the drag term since the velocity varies along the path; so you have to write a diff equation for that.
mvdv/dx=mg-kv^, e.g.
which is simple to solve.

RE: impact of sphere on water

correction
The drag term is kv^2, not kv^

RE: impact of sphere on water

As the free fall velocity of a human body (with legs and arms outstretched) is of the order of 50 m/s and the terminal velocity corresponding to the height of 150 m is about the same, I would say that the effect of the drag force by air is quite negligible here.
Now, craigp83, your problem is associated IMHO with the impact toughness of your metal filled phenolic plastic. If you can estimate that (or determine it by test) you would get an estimate of the energy necessary to break the ball, corresponding to the limit case of the mud behaving as a solid body.
If it was a steel ball with a typical toughness of 25 J on a 10x10 mm specimen, an energy of some 600 J would be required to break your ball into two halves, somewhat higher, but with the same order of magnitude, as the energy of the ball at impact.
So, if the toughness of the plastic is substantially lower than that of steel (as I expect, but have no data to offer), then you should expect a failure.

prex
http://www.xcalcs.com : Online tools for structural design
http://www.megamag.it : Magnetic brakes for fun rides
http://www.levitans.com : Air bearing pads

RE: impact of sphere on water

Here's my crazy suggestion.  

You said that normally, the fluid level is at the drill floor, but due to additives to the mud (I'm assuming it made the mud denser, which weighed down the whole fluid column, pushing it down) when you guys dropped the plug in, it was 115m lower.  If possible, couldn't you just bring the fluid level up higher so the ball doesn't fall as far before it hits the fluid? Seems to me that floating water on top of the mud should do the trick.  

However, I'm not a petroleum engineer, so I don't know what doing that would mean to the mud or the hole.

RE: impact of sphere on water

(OP)
rb1957 - yes, you're right. for final clarification the ball has a mass of 0.3kg.

prex - yeah, i'd considered doing a drop test.  I think we're sort of short on these things at the moment though so I'll wait until we get some spares in before I go breaking any more.

Jistre - yes, the idea is that the fluid should be at drill floor level and we will re-iterate this to the operator.

RE: impact of sphere on water

ok, i made a mistake ... i agree the weight of 1kgm is 1kgf, so the mass is 0.3kg;

and yes, the way i accounted for drag was conservative.

how about instead of dropping the ball, could you lower it (attached to some string, or something) ?

RE: impact of sphere on water

Realistically it seems like the sphere is going to experience hits on the pipe joints that cause very high stress concentrations long before it hits the drilling mud. I don't imagine that the drill pipe is perfectly plumb so the sphere is going to bounce its way to the bottom.

RE: impact of sphere on water

Why not experiment?

Do some controlled drops to validate calculations.

If nothing else drop it our of a top floor building into a bucket of water (or mud) and see if it survives.

To make sure it hits the water use a guideline (simplistically tape a bit of a drinking straw to each side of the sphere.  Have 2 parrallel lines (fishing line or similar) from drop height down to the bucket.

Try and record velocity or related if you can.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: impact of sphere on water

your typical billiard ball is a 2-1/4" phenolic sphere, relatively inexpensive, durable and readily available but maybe not heavy enough (150-175 G's) certainly heavier than water but not sure about your mud. anyway I'm with  dvd, sounds like its encountering shock more severe than simple 150m free fall into water

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources