Points or electronic ignition?
Points or electronic ignition?
(OP)
I have a question, more out of personal curiosity than anything.
Does anyone here still prefer to use "old fashioned" mechanical points ignition, or has everyone gone over to electronics these days, even for old engines that were designed for points. If any strong views, please put them forward (I know you will).
Thanks.
Does anyone here still prefer to use "old fashioned" mechanical points ignition, or has everyone gone over to electronics these days, even for old engines that were designed for points. If any strong views, please put them forward (I know you will).
Thanks.





RE: Points or electronic ignition?
So yeah, I'd be real keen to go back to a contact breaker.
Cheers
Greg Locock
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
Can you imagine eight sets of breaker points to run a modern V8 with a coil/cylinder..??
But no, I have no desire to go back to a practice of replacing the ignition points every so often nor having to adjust them again and again as the rubbing block wears.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
Nostalgia or restoration "correctness" probably top the list.
Next on the list (of reasons to not run points) would be cost (i.e. over the lifetime) or availability of converting to electronic ignition.
After that would be (arguably comprehended by "nostalgia" above) enjoyment/satisfaction of replacing & adjusting points. There's probably other reasons but above are the ones that I have first hand experience with.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
Electronic ignition would not look the part.
I will probably soon convert my classic ski boat with early 70's 350 Chev to an MSD and hall effect trigger so as to avoid maintenance and maintain stable consistent timing.
Regards
eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
For my 1970 Triumph T100C, I would never go to the electronic ignitions that are available, for the reasons Hemi indicated.
Nick
I love materials science!
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
It's a topic close to my heart, my "fun" car is a four cylinder inline 850 cc, with timing chain, carburettor, rear wheel drive and off-road tyres on the back wheels.
The engine was designed for a Lucas 45D4 with points. About five years ago I got tired of new OE Lucas condensers failing after very few miles and blackening the points.
I fitted an Aldon Ignitor instead (same as Pertronix from the USA) and have never looked back. The only slight worry about the use of this type of ignition is a possible reliability issue; if it fails, it's dead and the relatively high cost means not many are prepared to buy a second set as a reserve. I have carried a set of points in the car as a backup - not that I'd like to convert it back at the roadside on a dark and rainy night!
The beauty of this unit is that there is no external black box; the distributor is externally unchanged and the two leads go straight on the coil.
I've just found a supplier of a similar trigger module which comes complete with a rotor arm combined with the magnetic collar "switch" all in one lump, rather than using a separate collar with the original rotor arm.
Rather than the £70 ($150) or so for an Aldon, it cost just £10 sterling, or about $22! I've bought two; at this ridiculously cheap price I can certainly afford to keep the second unit in the car's spares bag.
I fitted one today. The actual unit and materials look to be good and solid. The road test just carried shows it is at least as good as the Aldon Igniter, which I can probably sell on and get my money back.
I'm hoping never to fit a set of points to a car ever again.
Old mechanical stuff is fine, but modern electronics are great.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
I thought it was merkins who didn't get irony?
Cheers
Greg Locock
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
The only conceivable exception to that might be some sort of historic vehicle, where the frequent maintenance and tinkering around is all part of the joy of owning such a vehicle.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
Thanks for your input! Paul Wheatley
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
I now also associate electronic ignitions with electronic spark advance curves.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
I went with electronic ignition (concurrent with 12v conversion) because the distributor itself is a POS; the old Load-A-Matic vacuum-advance-only kind. I ran 6v with points for a while, but the issue there is the condensers made for 6v systems are total junk, and typically fail in less than 100 miles. I ran it as 12v with points pretty much without problems, but wanted both centrifugal advance and vacuum advance, so I bought an MSD distributor that uses essentially GM HEI components (reluctor wheel). I would never use a Unilite or Pertronix system, if I had a failure on the road it would be weeks before I could get new parts. With the MSD every Auto Zone or NAPA has the parts, and the HEI components are very rugged to begin with.
On the Triumph, it's pretty much the same story. The distributor itself is the problem. The centrifugal advance unit hangs up and won't return all the way once the engine is hot. So I am installing a Boyer system that has no moving parts. I'd rather it used an OEM reluctor wheel, but "oh well..."
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
Needless to say I won't be riding the Triumph into the hinterlands with a Boyer ignition. But I do have my old flathead distributor stashed under the seat...
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
It may cost more, but it is no larger or difficult to replace if stuck on the side of the road.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
Even if I'd had a spare, it wouldn't have been fun to replace roadside. The shaft had to be removed to get the coil out, and it had to be soaked in solvent to get the varnish off before the shaft would pass through the upper bearing.
I don't miss that kind of stuff... and I pay for AAA Premium Service so I can get towed more than a few miles without a hassle.
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
Well, I've never heard of a single failure of a Pertronix / Aldon ignition module, but I've had new condensers fail within a day.
As i said, the Aldon lookalike moduless cost me £10 ($22) each. If one fails I'll be surprised, but to fit a replacement would take me less than 5 minutes and I know the ignition timing would be as it was with the "failed" unit. No points gap to set either.
Replacement drill:
Disconnect two leads from module to coil. Remove distributor cap. Remove two screws securing module onto distributor baseplate and remove it from distributor.
Refit new module with two securing screws. Refit distributor cap. Reconnect two leads module to coil.
Start engine, drive on.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
For cars that I actually have to drive, I go straight to MSD.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
I find Compression better to ignite the fuel charge than electricity.
If I had to chose though, electronics all the way.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
(I think this has now run its course and can be closed).
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
Points were a hassle in the areas that get lots of wet weather, corrosion etc. But way easier to fix if theres a problem. I prefer magnetos over all the others. Must be a reason Aircraft engines have 2 of them, and not electronic ignition system.
Points are impervious to EMP unlike micro circuit controlled engine management and ignition systems.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
Aircraft traditionally have magnetos because they aren't allowed to rely on the battery for ignition.
You are possibly correct about EMP causing damage, which might happen one day if there WAS a nuclear holocaust, but if it did the condenser would probably still fail - which is the reason I prefer electronic in the first place. I carry my spare module in a lead-lined box, of course
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
A bike does no good if you are a handicaped person that has no leg function.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
Regards
eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
I don,t have any dog in this hunt just a few observations.point igns do a decent job of firing fat mixtures across short gaps at low rpms. elec igns have a way of not just outright failing but coming and going.us elite types sometimes have trouble seeing the woods for the trees
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
I have had a cam turn on the shaft.
I have had condensers fail.
I have had coils fail.
I have not had an OEM quality electronic system fail in the last 20 years.
Regards
eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
The only road call I ever had for ignition (road call = vehicle towed - did not drive onward, i.e. roadside diagnosis/repair was unfeasible) was for (it turned out) a failed early Ford TFI module.
I've also had a series of no-starts and a road call (in a different vehicle) for a mysterious crank pickup issue, which one could argue is part of the electronic ignition.
Nevertheless, I would always pick a good quality electronic ignition system over points on any engine where that's a feasible option.
RE: Points or electronic ignition?
...ah, the good ole' days when R&R meant "remove & REPAIR" instead of the current "remove & REPLACE."