×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wind Exposure Categories
2

Wind Exposure Categories

Wind Exposure Categories

(OP)
My coworkers and I have been having several long and involved discussions on the Wind Exposure Categories described in the 2006 IRC.  Several questions have arisen out of what we feel are "grey areas".  We understand that the code refers to ASCE 7 under certain circumstances, but these questions strictly involve the IRC.

Table R301.2(1) is the Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria table which should be established by the local jurisdiction.  There is a column for Wind Speed but not for Exposure Category, however the referenced note "d" states:  "The jurisdiciton shall fill in this part of the table with the wind speed...  Wind exposure category shall be determined on a site-specific basis in accordance..."  It is implied that the governing municipality decides the appropriate exposure category.  Question #1)  Does the EOR have the right to challenge that decision?

Let's say a subdivision under construction would definitively be categorized as exposure B on three sides; east, south and west.  The category from the north would be C.  Question #2)  Would you design all aspects of the MWFRS to resist a C type exposure?

Suppose you're engineering these residences from north to south.  Question #3A)  Assuming the first row of houses has been designed for a C exposure, is there a point in this development where the residences can be designed for a B exposure?  Question #3B)  Where is that breaking point located?

Let's say the builder decides to construct their first house in the very middle of this subdivision which, when ALL the houses are constructed, would definitively be a B exposure.  Question #4)  Is it permissible to design that house as a B exposure even though it currently is not?

We've got our own interpretations that sometimes conflict, but we'd like to hear from you.  Thanks in advance for your responses.

RE: Wind Exposure Categories

You are actually getting paid to do a lateral design for a residence?   That is a rarity in my region.  

RE: Wind Exposure Categories

You mean you do them for free???

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Wind Exposure Categories

Ha ha.  It's rare that anyone pays to have it done.  Residences don't require a professional engineer to design.  If it is done, usually only gravity loads are looked at.  

RE: Wind Exposure Categories

2
Some questions to ask yourself:

Is doing 3 directions for B and 1 direction for C cost effective?  Might this house be rotated 90 degrees from it's original footprint on the lot, requiring a redesign?  Might the same house be built elsewhere in the neighborhood where the exposures will be different from the first house?  Are you going to save the builder that much money by doing some parts for C and others for B in the same house?

Since the house is being "engineered" it's probably already going to cost more to build than a prescriptively built house.  How much more is doing the entire structure as Exposure C gonna cost? (probably not a lot)


 

RE: Wind Exposure Categories

(OP)
ctcray...Apparently you've missed the point of this post entirely. The questions are purely theoretical in nature designed to ignite a discussion.  How we actually design the structure is not part of the issue at hand.  I challenge you and everyone else to provide a thoughtful and appropriate response.  

RE: Wind Exposure Categories

Question #1)  Does the EOR have the right to challenge that decision?

YES.

Let's say a subdivision under construction would definitively be categorized as exposure B on three sides; east, south and west.  The category from the north would be C.  Question #2)  Would you design all aspects of the MWFRS to resist a C type exposure?

YES.  especially after considering the questions i posed above.

  Question #3A)  Assuming the first row of houses has been designed for a C exposure, is there a point in this development where the residences can be designed for a B exposure?  

Probably, but why bother.

Question #3B)  Where is that breaking point located?

See answer to #3a

Let's say the builder decides to construct their first house in the very middle of this subdivision which, when ALL the houses are constructed, would definitively be a B exposure.  Question #4)  Is it permissible to design that house as a B exposure even though it currently is not?

NO.   Due to the downturn in the housing market, the builder stops building any new homes in the neighborhood and leaves the houses in the middle designed for B left exposed to C.

Sorry my first response wasn't thoughtful enough.

RE: Wind Exposure Categories

1.) Can EOR challenge the Bldg Official(s)?  Yes

2.) Say a house is in middle of development and has initial C exposure to north.   When development is completed then B exposure in all directions.   If there is a "reasonable degree of certainty" (as the deposing attorney will say) that the development will be completed shortly, then exposure B all directions could be considered.  But Building Official has final say.

3. As a fenestration supplier to upscale housing projects, we sometimes pay careful attention to exposure category mix.   Say back of house faces a large lake (exp C) while other directions are exp B.   A large fenestration assembly facing lake has exp C positive and exp B negative component & cladding wind loads.   That's important if IRC, Figure R301.1(7), wall corner area (5) applies.

  Good discussion ctcray!

RE: Wind Exposure Categories

Swish72

1) Yes, but don't expect to prevail easily. You are asking the AHJ to allow you to violate adopted law.

2) Yes, but I like to keep things simple.

3A) Probably, but one is depending on construction sequencing of a sub-division for load reduction. I don't get warm fuzzies from it.

3B) Again, we need construction sequencing and maybe a wind tunnel. Again, no warm fuzzies.

4) NO. I would never count on a plan that may never come to fruition to reduce loads on a building I am designing today. It may be years before the subdivision is built out. What if your house gets built and a month later the wind storm comes along. Will your house, built to a lesser standard, survive? I wouldn't gamble my seal on it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources