×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

identify the cause of the failures

identify the cause of the failures

identify the cause of the failures

(OP)
The purpose is to identify the cause of the failures and make corrective repairs. The pumps have been in service since the late 1970's and have exhibited high vibrationa at vane pass frequency but operated with normal maintenance without failure for approx 10 years at a time. Since 2003, five of the pumps modified with new diffusers to reduce high vibrations at vane pass frequency. All had balancing device and thrust bearing failure. the modified diffusers have 9 vanes instead of 8. This is a boiler feed 5 stage pump. I did the CFD analysis of considering the cases of 8 & 9 vanes but as per that analysis hard to say anything.

RE: identify the cause of the failures

It seems that the change from 8 to 9 vane diffuser has resulted in some mismatch beween impeller outlet and diffuser inlet increasing the axial thrust and needs to be the focus of investigation. Any feed-back from the manufacturer.

RE: identify the cause of the failures

(OP)
No feedback from the manufacturer. Actually original OEM was differnt and then later the design ( 8 to 9 diffuser vane) revised by different manufacturer. It is a 5 satge pump & 1st stage is a double suction impeller. In the 5th stage the A gap  (with 8 vane ) was .070 inch. After modification they reduced the A gap to .030 inch. Is this be a couse of failure ? This is the information i have.

RE: identify the cause of the failures

It appears from here that manufacturer B has a less perfect understanding of what the pumps require than does manufacturer A.

Is there some reason you can't get them rebuilt by manufacturer A?  ... and restored to their original design, or one that's evolved in the correct direction?

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: identify the cause of the failures

what was the effect on the blade pass frequency after changing to 9 vanes.
Anyway- it seems that even though you have high frequency vibration with the OEM design, the life of the pump was better and you should consider reverting to the original and look into the frequency problem again.

RE: identify the cause of the failures

Just a wild thought here, we have never actually tried this. What about cutting new key ways through the impeller hubs of the last 4 stages. This would allow you to progressively rotate/offset slightly these impellers on the shaft so that the blade passing does not occur all at the same time for all of the impellers. The blade passing frequency would increase but the amplitude should decrease. This would be a simple machining operation plus a strip and rebuild.  Just a thought.  

RE: identify the cause of the failures

(OP)
There is no problem to fix it as OEM A but I am interested in the cause of failure. This is the analysis i am doing right now. We have taken the project to find out the possible cause of balance disk failure. There are only three changes as I inderstood.
1. The second OEM reduced the A gap to .03 inch in the last stage.
2. Change in the diffuer design (8 to 9 vanes).

As per my thinking diffuser is not playing any role here. May be the 7 impeller vanes & 9 diffuser vanes combition is not right. There are some charts but i am not having right now. A Gap can play an influnce on this problem as it is reduced considerable (from .079 to .039) but I need some proof to proov this. The most of the OEM's are using the values like .040 & sometimes even less value. I have calculated the resultant thrust also. The total resultant thrust is 11.21 E04 lbs. By considering this thrust, i have calculated the counter bore diameter of balance drum. As per my calculation that diameter is 9.65. As per the drawing the diameter is 9.40. This may also be the possible cause of failure.

3. There was no taper on balance drum & balance sleeve. There is a full sucface contact.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources