×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Drilled Shaft Group Efficiency

Drilled Shaft Group Efficiency

Drilled Shaft Group Efficiency

(OP)
I am trying to find a reference for reduction in axial capacity of a drilled shaft due to group action.  Many of the references I have looked at discuss it vaguely but none I can find provide recommendations.  What I can find is that they should be spaced at least 2.5 to 3 diameters minimum, and that there is no reduction for spacing greater than 7 diameters.  I am also looking for reductions in uplift alone.

My specific application is 18 to 30-inch diameter drilled shafts embedded 20 to 50 feet in weakly to moderately cemented cemneted siltstone/sandstone, no groundwater.  Groups of up to 4.  The capacity of the shafts will be from end bearing and shaft friction in the lower 5 to 10 feet.

Thanks for any references.   

RE: Drilled Shaft Group Efficiency

Group capacity factors are used for driven piles that use skin friction as a component of bearing capacity. Can be greater than one in sands and less than one in cohesive soils.  Drilled shafts are usually end bearing and do not need any reduction in cohesive, (no densification of sands occurs so no increase for group factor).

RE: Drilled Shaft Group Efficiency

moe333,

I've seen numerous geotechnical reports that provided me with drilled pier capacities and recommended the 3 x diameter spacing.  Most of those would then go on to say that if I had closer spacing - we could go to 1.5 x diameter and use 50% of the capacity....interpolating between 50% and 100% from 1.5x to 3.0x.

RE: Drilled Shaft Group Efficiency

(OP)
Thanks BigH but I have that publication and it does not provide specific recommendations.

RE: Drilled Shaft Group Efficiency

The AASHTO LRFD specifications (4th ed.) state that the efficiency factor for groups of drilled shafts in choesionless soil should be 0.65 for center-to-center spacing of 2.5 diameters, and 1.0 for spacings of 4 diameters or more.  You should linearly interpolate for spacings between 2.5 and 4.  For clays, you consider the soil block enclosed by the drilled shafts as a single foundation element.

In the commentary it notes that these recommendations are based on theoretical considerations and on limited load test results.  They refer you to O'Neill and Reese (1999) for additional details. This is the FHWA Drilled Shaft publication.

AASHTO does not specifically address drilled shafts that are bearing in rock.  In general, I would not use a group efficiency factor for drilled shafts socketed into rock.

RE: Drilled Shaft Group Efficiency

Do the group factor reductions apply to shafts only under axial loads, or does it apply for shafts which also resist lateral loading?

RE: Drilled Shaft Group Efficiency

minorchord2000,

The recent AASHTO LRFD specifications, as well as the most recent FHWA Driven Pile Manual (not available for free download), address the latest research for pile group efficiencies resisting lateral loads.

Jeff

RE: Drilled Shaft Group Efficiency

(OP)
Panars, are the efficiencies you reference for uplift as well?

RE: Drilled Shaft Group Efficiency

minorchord2000-

The group efficiency values I gave above are for axial compression loading of drilled shafts.  The AASHTO LRFD specification gives different values for lateral loading.
These are:

CODE

Center to Center         P multiplier
Spacing            Row 1     Row 2      Row 3
  3B                0.7       0.5        0.35
  5B                1.0       0.85       0.7

moe333-

No, the values are for axial compression loading only.  For uplift of pile groups and drilled shaft groups, the AASHTO LRFD specification uses the lesser of the sum of the individual piles (shafts) or the uplift resistance of the soil enclosed by the pile group.  For cohesionless soils, the uplift resistance is the weight of the soil lifted by the piles.  This is a block of soil bounded by a rectangle at the pile tips (assuming the group is rectangular) and with sides that are sloped 1H:4V, getting wider towards the ground surface. This makes a inverted truncated pyramid.  For cohesive soils the uplift resistance is the weight of the soil block enclosed by the piles plus the shear resistance along the sides of the pile group.

The reference given for uplift of pile and shaft groups is Tomlinson, 1987, Pile Design and Construction Practice.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources