×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Symmetry BC for thick wall cylinder

Symmetry BC for thick wall cylinder

Symmetry BC for thick wall cylinder

(OP)
Geometry: concentric thick wall tubes, with differential thermal expansion. Software: ANSYS 10.0.
If I use plane stress elements, the solution for a 1/4 cross-section model with symmetry BC coincides with that for a full model which recovers exactly the analytical solution.
If I use 1/4th model with generalized plane strain (long cylinders) elements and same symmetry BC, the solution is no longer axisymmetric, with the contact pressure being non-uniform. Same (bad) solution if using contact elements or coupled DOFs between the 2 cylinders.
Question: why wouldn't the symmetry BC work with generalized plane strain?

RE: Symmetry BC for thick wall cylinder

I'd say the answer is more to do what what is working (than waht isn't) ... i think that your plane strain plates allow a bending reaction that the plane stress ones don't have, so this should change the result; no?

RE: Symmetry BC for thick wall cylinder

RaduP:

You should still get results from the plane strain solution that are symmetric. If you don't then I would look carefully at your model as you have introduced some kind of asymmetry in the plane strain model.....

You should not expect to get the same absolute results from the two models as the end conditions (in the z direction are different) but I would expect to retain the symmetric aspects of the solution...i.e. just changing from plane stress to plane strain should not cause the general form of the solution to be different....just the absolute values...

Ed.R.

RE: Symmetry BC for thick wall cylinder

You can't have the same solution as the analytical one with plane stress elements as your axial stress will be zero.

There's no reason why the generalised plane strain element wouldn't have worked. I'd check your input temperatures as a non-uniform contact pressure would indicate you have non-uniform thermal expansion or an error in your contact surfaces.

Surely 2D axis-ymmetric elements would have been much better to use?

corus

RE: Symmetry BC for thick wall cylinder

(OP)
EdR and corus, thank you for your input.
Of course I don't expect the same solution between plain stress and plain strain. With regard to model asymmetries, the generalized plane strain model is exactly the same as the plane stress model, except in the batch file I change plane strain to plain stress (KEYOPT...).
Corus,
I've chosen to use 2-D solid as opposed to axisymmetric, because I wanted to be able to later extend the model to some other non-axisymmetric geoemtries and/or loading.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources