×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

disconnect
2

disconnect

disconnect

(OP)
I have a customer how wants to used a rotary disconnect in the control panel with a (Hoffman) hinged window kit over the handle. I Don't believe this would meet code. The NFPA 79 for machine building reads the disconnect needs to be readily accessible. Can anyone add to this..... Thanks

RE: disconnect

I have to honestly say that that is a new one. Why on earth would they want a rotary disconnect handle, then put it behind a door, clear or otherwise?

Anyway, I believe your assessment of the NFPA 79 rules is correct. The point behind "accessibility" is to facilitate a quick way to turn power off in an emergency. But if they have a separate EPO (Emergency Power Off) or EMO (EMergency Off) system in place that can be activated by, for instance an Emergency Stop push button on the outside which activates a UV Release on a circuit breaker or opens a main power contactor, then it may be legitimate to put the disconnect behind a window I suppose. I still don't see the point.

RE: disconnect

(OP)
The control panel is for a router that runs at 400HZ. The customer wants to put a safety switch on the door which tie into a safety module in the e-stop circuit. This would cause the motor to brake before it could be serviced. Now this could take up to 10-15 sec. to brake at that time a person could still turn the disconnect off not letting the motor to brake.

The point is I don't like the ideal of putting a door over the disconnect. I'm looking for more arguments on this subject.

RE: disconnect

Well, we've supplied a few units with the breaker handle inside the door on another hinged panel covering everything inside the enclosure. It was for an outdoor application so the operators were on same said panel and I believe there was a window in the door too so the display and lights were visible. We've also supplied large breakers through the door with another door over them to get a Type 12 rating on the enclosure. Not questioned by an inspector yet. As long as the cover is simple to open it should pass. The interpretation of "readily accessible" is very open.

However, might I suggest some wiring and a light that says something like "Safe to Turn Off" or "Do Not Turn Off" or something similar instead. The cover still won't guarantee the operator waits 15 seconds before shutting the thing off.

RE: disconnect

Yes and if the intent is  to extend the turn-OFF time then that probably won't fly..   A label is your only recourse.

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.- http://www.flaminsystems.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources