×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cracked Section for Foundation Mats?

Cracked Section for Foundation Mats?

Cracked Section for Foundation Mats?

(OP)
I’m modeling a foundation mat using STAAD and I wanted to know how you model cracked section mats supported on soil springs only. For flat plate and slabs, ACI 318-05, Section 10.11.1 recommends using 0.25 I_gross, which I’d put into STAAD as 0.25*E_concrete (since deflection is normally calculated as a factor*E*I in the denominator). Here are the results, as an example:

Un-cracked section mat:

Base Pressure min/max = 741/4,328 psf
Deflection max = 0.200”
Mx min/max = -104/78 kip-ft/ft
Mz min/max = -61/84 kip-ft/ft


Cracked section mat:

Base Pressure min/max = 200/7,091 psf (64% increase!!!)
Deflection max = 0.328” (64% increase as well, since proportional)
Mx min/max = -95/77 kip-ft/ft (slight reduction in moments)
Mz min/max = -65/46 kip-ft/ft (83% reduction in mid-span moments!!!)

I guess I’m a little confused why is there a difference in the moments? Where do the section properties such as E or I come in play in M=wL^2/8 (as a very simple case)? Isn’t loading, shear and moment independent of the section properties?

Also, am I right to think that service loads deflection and soil pressure should be calculated using a cracked section and then the analysis should be re-run with an uncracked section to obtain ultimate strength factored moments and shears?

Thank you,

RE: Cracked Section for Foundation Mats?

Seems logical. The stiffer the matt (less cracked) compared to the supporting material the more even the pressure distribution (infinitely stiff would give even pressure), the smaller the deflections and the bigger the moments.



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources