×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

(OP)
Hi, I am designing a piping system for a small plant. We are going to move brackish water at 60 bar and Tmax: 40C. I am wondering if I can use 316SS for piping. My concern is the corrosion.

I am looking for any link or research someone might know of that can guarantee 316SS for use in brackish water application.

I don't have information of the chemical composition of the water. I am looking online for a chemical composition table for brackish water but I cannot find it.

Thank in advance for any reply.

RE: 316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

Alloy    Cr    Mo     N    Ni    PREN    Y.S.    T.S.    
2101    21.5    0.3    0.22    1.5    26    515    650
2003    20.5    1.5    0.18    3    29    515    725
2205    22    3    0.17    5    35    515    760
2507    25    4    0.27    7    42    550    8
304L    18    0    0.05    8    18    220    520
316L    16    2    0.05    10    24    220    520
317L    18    3    0.05    14    29    230    540
AL6-XN©    21    6    0.22    24    45    380    760
254SMO    20    6    0.20    18    43    380    750
You need a PREN of 35 for seawater at 40C. The max chloride level you will experience is required for a precise answer, but it is unlikely that 316 will be sufficient.

Michael McGuire
http://stainlesssteelforengineers.blogspot.com/

RE: 316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

Most brackish water systems are designed like seawater systems.  The higher oxygen levels and biological activity often make them just as corrosive even at the lower salinity.
This would point to alloys such as 6%Mo superaustenitics and super duplexes (and for tubing superferritics).
The most available grades will be AL-6XN and 254SMO.  These alloys are strong and very expensive.  Use the lightest walls possible.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Still trying to help you stop corrosion.
formerly Trent Tube, now Plymouth Tube
eblessman@plymouth.com
or edstainless@earthlink.net

RE: 316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

2205 works well if you can avoid crevices. Otherwise go with 2507. Each are stronger than austenitic grades and contain less nickel, so should be cheaper with no compromise in corrosion resistance for 2507. A lot of it is used for subsea umbilicals in oil production.

Michael McGuire
http://stainlesssteelforengineers.blogspot.com/

RE: 316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

(OP)
thank you guys for your answers.

See the following information

We do not believe that there will be any corrosion issues with the 316L on brackish water.  The chloride has to get well above 5000 ppm to be able to start to corrode stainless steel.

This is why I am wondering about the chloride concentration in brackish water.  

RE: 316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

I have seen 316L fail in a matter of weeks from crevice corrosion (no dissimilar metals, neutral pH, no MIC) at ambient temp in 500ppm Cl.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Still trying to help you stop corrosion.
formerly Trent Tube, now Plymouth Tube
eblessman@plymouth.com
or edstainless@earthlink.net

RE: 316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

ucabjm,
1) The concentration of chlorides, etc. in your brackish water depends upon its source.  If groundwater, the U.S. Geological Survey or state may have some info.  Do a search.  E.g., http://ca.water.usgs.gov/archive/reports/ofr01242/

2) Nobody will guarantee that 316 can resist 5000 ppm chloride at 40 °C because, as mcquire and EdStainless have already informed you, it won't. From the following figure, for 5000 ppm chloride water, 316 is expected to pit above 31 °C (print at 150% to show your boss).  
 


Also, 316 is well-known for crevice corrosion and stress corrosion cracking.  “As a general rule, crevice corrosion will occur at around 15-20 °C below the temperature at which pitting occurs.”  See
http://www.assda.asn.au/asp/index.asp?pgid=17991&cid=34299&id=56951

RE: 316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

in a rererence of NIDI, 1000ppm is taken as a "safe" limit of chlorides for 316SS. this limits is somehow relative to the environmental condition as has been said before. high velocity no crevice and low oxygen can rise this value, while high temp stagnnant conditions and possibility of crevice will lower it.considering the high temp and the possibility of 5000 ppm of cl-, as a minimum a duplex 2205 sholud be considered in my opinion as a starting point in materials selection.the final selection shall be based on a general assessment of all the piping, equipment and critidality of the service.

strider

http://www.corrosionist.com

RE: 316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

What will it take to get people to wake up and see that 316, with its 10% nickel and therefore high cost, low strength, propensity to SCC, is inferior to duplex? 2205 is a huge upgrade in corrosion resistance, so with thinner walls allows cost reduction. Better yet 2003. But most of all, they work well, which 316 does not.

Michael McGuire
http://stainlesssteelforengineers.blogspot.com/

RE: 316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

(OP)
Again, thank you for all your answers.

On regards the crecive corrosion, I got the following information:
our vendor components are machined from wrought pipe vs. cast, they virtually eliminate crevice corrosion.   Is this true??

I am going to request information about using 2205 instead of 316.

RE: 316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

Thanks for covering my back McG,
A duplex would be a good option, and it would pay IF you could reduce the wall thickness.
I would go to at least 2205.  I like AL2003, but I don't feel that it is up to this application.

As for crevices, they can have a number of sources.  A poorly machined surface that has some microscopic smearing will be crevice rich.  How they clean/pickle/passivate is critical.  Any mechanical joint will have crevices, and the tighter that they are the worse the corrosion risk.
Castings are often criticized, but a well annealed and cleaned casting is fine.  Just like a poorly annealed piece of welded pipe may be crap.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Still trying to help you stop corrosion.
formerly Trent Tube, now Plymouth Tube
eblessman@plymouth.com
or edstainless@earthlink.net

RE: 316 SS corrosion - Brackish water

Duplex is a good choice but for the temperature wouldn't it be cheaper to go with a lined piping system, like polypropylene lined carbon steel.   At least for the major strait runs.   I would also suggest fiberglass if you can bring the pressure down to less than 450 psig.

Regards
StoneCold

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources