×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Test for AlN embrittlement in steel castings - ASTM A703/E340

Test for AlN embrittlement in steel castings - ASTM A703/E340

Test for AlN embrittlement in steel castings - ASTM A703/E340

(OP)
Folks,

I have a 0.5 Cr 0.5 Mo 0.25 V steel casting which has been in service for some time. It has become brittle.

I have performed an HCl macroetch on a sample of the steel (as per astm standards quoted in subject line), and it indicates that the steel has embrittled ('highly networked structure'). At first I put this down to aluminium nitride embrittlement.

However, I did note in that in A703, a network structure suggests "aluminium nitrides, OR other constituents prone toward precipitating and the grain boundaries" would give a positive indication. A big 'or' in my case.

Was wondering if anyone had any experience regarding this macro-etch test, and whether the results would be expected to be different whether it was aluminium embrittlement, or temper embrittlement (S, P, Sn, As at grain boundaries). If the etch isn't selective, is there another test possible to distinguish the two? (Auger spectroscopy?)

Thanks in advance

RE: Test for AlN embrittlement in steel castings - ASTM A703/E340

Quote:

I have a 0.5 Cr 0.5 Mo 0.25 V steel casting which has been in service for some time. It has become brittle.

How did you confirm this? Did you run CVN impact tests? Have you run a complete chemcial analysis?

I would not run and jump to any conclusions unless you answer yes to the above questions. The Cr-Mo steels can suffer from thermal embrittlement resulting in a loss of toughness and even ductility related to tramp elements and not AlN.

RE: Test for AlN embrittlement in steel castings - ASTM A703/E340

(OP)
Brittleness was suggested by component cracking and confirmed by testing.

CVN tests were conducted - 4 J at room temp. A series of charpys were conducted at various elevated temperatures, FATT appears to be above 150C.

Complete chemical analysis was performed, the aluminium content was the only element that really stood out (0.1% by weight).

All the other impurity elements were within spec, although the spec is quite old (S, P limits were 0.03%, my understanding is that nowadays, limits are about a factor of 10 lower).

So we know the material is embrittled, and is likely due to grain boundary impurities as indicated by the macroetch - we're looking to take the next step to determine what these impurities are.

RE: Test for AlN embrittlement in steel castings - ASTM A703/E340

Did you find any other tramp elements in the chemical analysis results, like As, Sb, Sn? The P will significantly enhance susceptibility to thermal embrittlement for Cr-Mo-V alloys, cast or wrought. What you are reporting is no different than what I have seen in forged high pressure and intermediate pressure steam turbine rotor steels.

Did you evaluate the fracture surfaces of the CVN impact samples using an SEM? If not, I would start there and evaluate the constituents along the grain boundaries (I am assuming intergranular fracture at the reported CVN values).

RE: Test for AlN embrittlement in steel castings - ASTM A703/E340

(OP)

Quote:

Did you evaluate the fracture surfaces of the CVN impact samples using an SEM? If not, I would start there and evaluate the constituents along the grain boundaries (I am assuming intergranular fracture at the reported CVN values).

We've attempted to, but we didn't get any definitive results (i.e., couldn't see P, or Al for that matter). However, literature suggests that the impurities are highly localised to the fracture surface (order of angstroms), so EDAX would be relatively insensitive to it.

Are there any other options for distinguishing the two embrittling mechanisms (temper & AlN)? I've heard Picral etchant is quite sensitive to P segregation, and it may be possible to heat treat to affect one but not the other.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources