×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

(OP)
When using hairpins to transfer frame lateral loads into the slab, how do you handle slab shrinkage?  I'm guessing there cannot be any control joints in the slab, and the hairpins tie the slab to the foundation walls.

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

I think this is something that is overlooked often. When the mesh is cut at the joint then there is only the first rectangular piece of slab resisting the thrust. This is made worse when a vapor barrier is directly beneath the slab by  reducing the friction.

I like to use tie beams that span the width of the building and put control joints between and directly on each side of the tie beams.

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

(OP)
haynewp-

Thanks for the respone. Sounds like the joints you describe are running parallel to the tie beam.  I'm really interested in the joints running perpendicular to the tie beam, and I'm REALLY interested in how the slab handles both the thrust and the shrinkage when there is no tie beam.

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

Well, I am suggesting a tie beam so you can run the joints perpendicular to it and not worry about the slab as the tie beams take all the thrust.

If you are set on using hairpins instead of tie beams, then you have to check there is enough slab between the first joint and the edge of slab to resist the thrust. I have done this before when I had a small amount of thrust to resist. I had to balance this requirement with the maximum jointed area of slab for shrinkage.

I am not sure how else to handle this, I always show the mesh cut at the control joints (though this likely doesn't happen) so I can't count on that to grab the remainder of the slab past the first joint.  

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

I have added bars lapped on to the hairpins to make sure I could activate the required slab area - regardless of where they saw the joints.

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

I typically use 2" top cover to slab reinforcing and stipulate the sawcuts are 1-1/2" deep; this saves wear and tear on the saw blade, too.

Dik

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

Like dik, I detail the mesh at the slab control joint to NOT be cut.  Then you can count on more slab to resist the horizontal force (or even tie all the way across the building).

But then, you may ask, how does the control joint function?  I have been told that there has been research done that shows wire mesh, still intact across a control joint, can elongate enough to allow the control joint to crack and open up.

DaveAtkins

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

(OP)
Thanks everyone.  Some of the suggestions run contrary to my normal practice (i.e., running the reinforcing through the control joints, using the slab weight to resist the thrust).  But they obviously must work.  After all these years, I still have a lot to learn.

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

I never use more than one panel to resist thrust, even if the mesh is continuous through the joint and could develop more.  You don't really know where the mesh is in the slab - it could have been cut.  I count on passive pressure against the footing or turndown to provide the rest of the resistance.  There is a practical limit where hairpins are not feasible anymore to resist the thrust - that's where I go to tie rods from column to column.

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

DaveAtkins,

I am interested if you can find that research. It wouldn't surprise me if that is the case.

I am pretty sure the control joints don't actually line up with the cuts in the mesh, but I always see it shown this way. The mesh on my projects normally ends up sitting on ground (they try to pull it during pouring) even when I specify it as chaired so I don't know how effective it is one way or the other.

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

When I have designed buildings with post-tensioned ground slabs, the hairpins were welded to the columns after the slab was given time to shrink.

They used U shaped hairpins with a flat section placed against the side of the column. After the slabs were tensioned they put steel spacers in the gap between the hairpin and the column and welded it to both.

Normally we would put joints in a slab even though it had hairpins.

csd

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

Another thing... I don't like using WWM for slabs... too many problems with placement and cover...

Dik

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

haymewp,

I am sorry, but I don't have an actual article.  Another engineer told me about the research.

DaveAtkins

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

hawmewp, it makes sense from an engineering point of view. The strength of steel plus concrete is stronger than steel alone. Any yielding will occur at the point of weakness, i.e. the joint.

Of course it still gives some restraint.

csd

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

What do you do in the case that you substitute rebar for WWF in the slab on grade? Do you still show the rebar as continuous through the control joints?

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

I don't substitute rebar for WWF... I just don't use WWF <G>; with rebar, I can usually space it sufficiently far apart so the concrete dudes can step between it and not have it placed on the bottom of the slab.  The rebar is generally continuous through the control joints.  If I have 'big' floor plates, then I may run each second bar through or if I have an actual expansion joint, then I discontinue the bars and I may use greased dowels.

Dik

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

dik,

Larger bars spaced farther apart are less effective at preventing cracking. Personally, I would think this is a bigger issue than having the WWF say 1" too low.

csd

RE: Slab on grade for rigid frame buildings

Not spaced that far apart... usually try for something about 14" to 18"... Dik

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources