×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Relay-Fuse coordination CTI/Grading Time

Relay-Fuse coordination CTI/Grading Time

Relay-Fuse coordination CTI/Grading Time

(OP)
IEEE 242-2001, p605, suggest a coordination interval of 0.12 between fuse and upstream static relay. Others, suggest similar values such as 0.10, for example, http://siemens.siprotec.de/download_neu/applications/SIPROTEC/english/Appl_03_Coordination_of_Overcurrent_Relais_with_Fuses_en.pdf

I assume these are referring to the total clearing curve. Although some manufacturers, for example Siba and others, mostly present the one average curve.

I believed the fuse total clearing curve was already the  maximum including all tolerances (at the stated temperature). So, I am wondering what these time intervals are accounting for, and if it is actually needed at all. Could it simply be from a previous era when the starting point was only average curves. My consideration is indoor, so cold weather is not a factor.

Does someone have some insights on this item? Thanks

RE: Relay-Fuse coordination CTI/Grading Time

I'd certainly only use 0.1s from a total clearing curve, average could be much worse.  Instantaneous elements (or time overcurrent for that matter) in numeric relays don't drop out instantaneously.  0.1 s is probably longer than absolutely necessary, but unless you have the ability to test under actual fault conditions, or you are willing to allow the occasional over trip, I'd be rather leery about tightening it up too much.

RE: Relay-Fuse coordination CTI/Grading Time

Yes, it is based on total clearing time.

Some allowance is required for:

CT Error
Relay error



RE: Relay-Fuse coordination CTI/Grading Time

(OP)
Yes, dpc, it must be that. I see others suggest fuse-fuse as "daylight", and the same for LVCB-LVCB. That seems to settle the fuse total curve as including all tolernaces. So, it must be about CT and relay error. I also now see that some experienced people have a lower interval for relay Inst, and definite time regions. If my app is for certain in the Inst/DT region, with no chance of moving into the time overcurrent region, then that eliminates the CT error. Remaining is the relay timing error, which is really difficult to imagine as 100-120 ms (6 - 7.2 cycles on 60 Hz). I see one prominent relay listed as +/-0.25 cycle timer accuracy for 50 elements (inst/DT).

If the above makes sense, I would conclude that Ieee 242-2001 is conservative, and is a broad brush. Further, we can have tighter intervals in the Inst/DT region. I'll probably stay with 100 ms for now (fear is my valuable assistant!). However, perhaps 50 ms is not so unreasonable, also.

RE: Relay-Fuse coordination CTI/Grading Time

I normally try to maintain 0.15 sec, but I'm OK with 0.10 sec.  I would not want to go less than that.  I don't trust the fuse curves that much.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources