×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?

NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?

NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?

(OP)
Hi, we have a pump that's cavitating.  Right before the suction inlet the piping has 2 45 degree bends welded together to gain about 2" of elevation.  I know that there should be around 3-5 pipe diameters of pipe in a straight line before the suction inlet, but in this case it's about 0.5 pipe diameters.  I would think moving this farther away from the pump would alleviate the cavitation, but I don't see anything in the calculation for NPSH that accounts for the position of this bend in the piping.  Ideally, I know it'd just be best to get rid of the bend, but cutting a new outlet from the tank would be a lot more expensive.  Thanks for any advice on this.

RE: NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?

The location of the elbows is more for laminar flow reasons than NPSH.  It allows the fluid to "straighten out" so it enters the eye of the impeller at the center, with minimized turbulence, rather than overloading one side of the pump inlet.  

The turbulence and friction loss associated with elbows will reduce the NPSHa regardless of where they are located in the suction.  But you want as close as you can get to laminar flow at the pump suction.  This is why you want a straight run into the pump suction.

RE: NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?

Not to mention the flow loss of the bends themselves, you should not have any fittings within a preferred 10xD of the pump inlet.

http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

RE: NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?

By the way, what is the NPSHA and NPSHR for your pump?

RE: NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?

What is the NPSH required by the pump? What is the calculated NPSH available?  Increased friction loss from 2 45 degree bends should be negligible. Are you sure the pump is actually cavitating? If NPSHR is significantly less than NPSHA, I would look elsewhere.  

RE: NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?


Suction pipe vortices and pre-rotation increase the NPSHR.

RE: NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?

NPSHr is a determined by pump variables (rating, RPM, impeller diameter, etc).

NPSHa is determined by system variables (friction loss, tank level, fluid temp, etc)  Therefore vortices and pre-rotation are said to reduce NPSHa, not increase NPSHr.    

RE: NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?

If this is a double suction impeller design then a bend close to the inlet could cause cavitation in one impeller eye only.  I ask again, are you sure this is cavitation? Did you run the numbers?  

RE: NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?


Experts tell us that prerotation effects may also depend on the impeller geometry and specific speed.

There are cases where at low (partial) flow rates the NPSHR undergoes a drastic increase, an effect attributed to prerotation setting in.

In extreme cases, with low NPSHA, the system may develop noise and vibration, as if subjected to hammer blows.

RE: NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?

What type of pump are you talking about - end suction or horizontal split case - as the positioning of bends at the inlet has different effects in each case.

RE: NPSHA affected by position of pipe irregularity?

BigInch - not so for a horizontal split case pump unit, a 45 or 90 degree bend is ok fitted directly to the inlet flange provided the flow direction is in the same plain as the inlet branch leading to the impeller.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources