×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

When do we need to design for torsion in a structural member?

When do we need to design for torsion in a structural member?

When do we need to design for torsion in a structural member?

(OP)
I've got a question about when to design torsion in structural members, say steel, but maybe reinforced concrete as well.  A colleague of mine was designing structural steel members for bending and axial loads, but not for torsion and was put on the "hot seat" when his calcs were checked by the Supervisor because torsion was not allowed for.

My question is under what circumstances is it compulsory to consider torsion? Is it when the load is applied away from the shear center only? Like loads on a cantilevered balcony or some other eccentric load?  When the member on which the load is being applied is unsymmetric?

Are they other conditions where we have to considet torsion?Is any particular shape (W shapes vs Square Tubes, etc.) more susceptible to torsion?

When we do encounter torsion, what is the best design approach to ensuring that torsion has been designed for and will not be a problem?  What do we have to check for, specifically?

Thanks in advance.

RE: When do we need to design for torsion in a structural member?

I had a professor in grad school that said the best way to design for torsion is to eliminate it! I tend to agree!

RE: When do we need to design for torsion in a structural member?

Check for torsion when:
1.  You have a cladding being attached back to the underside (or top) of a beam that will exert a horizontal load that is not through the centroid of the section.
2.  You have a vertical load that is being cantilevered from a beam and does not load the beam through its web.  

I am sure there are other blatantly obvious situations that I am missing and others here will mention.  


A WF (or any open section) performs much worse than an HSS (closed section does) as far as torsion is concerned.

RE: When do we need to design for torsion in a structural member?

I agree with jike, the best way is to eliminate the problem.
Torsion is never a good thing.

RE: When do we need to design for torsion in a structural member?

There may be unavoidable situations when torsion cannot be fully eliminated. For an example, built in perimeter beams, etc.

The design for torsion of the concrete beams is covered under chapter-11 of ACI-318 building code.

RE: When do we need to design for torsion in a structural member?

No question there are many situations in commercial construction where torsion cannot be eliminated, for instance where hanging brick. You can minimize this torsion by kicking back to the structure at frequent intervals.

RE: When do we need to design for torsion in a structural member?

Re: AISC Steel Design Guide 9, Torsional Analysis of Structural Steel Members, 1997.

I-beam shear connections resist little beam torsion. You must use other means to transfer the I-beam torsion.  There are many ways to do this.  You can reduce or eliminate I-beam torsion by bracing the flanges.  If you can not use bracing, then you must weld the flanges solid at it ends and design the I-beam with torsion included.  Stiffeners will not help you with I-beam torsion.  However, they are good for local flange torsion though.

RE: When do we need to design for torsion in a structural member?

Well, there are two issues with this.

One - serviceability - if you are concerned about the torsional distortion of a member and how it affects the elements that connect to it (such as what jike mentions with brick) then you should always be considering it since it will twist (especially open sections like wide flanges) and efforts should be taken to understand and control the twist.

Two - strength - if you are concerned about strength in torsion, first consider whether the twist is essential to the overall integrity of the structure.  ACI 318 has always had a nice sketch representing floor systems that depend on torsion for stability and floor systems that don't:  see commentary on section 11.6.2.

If it is essential to integrity - yes you must design for it - absolutely.  If you can tolerate some level of twist and design the structure as though it does twist, then for concrete you can design for a lower bound level of torsion.  In steel, you should understand the torsional stresses that develop and how they add to the shear stresses.  

RE: When do we need to design for torsion in a structural member?

Eliminate it, or check it always.  

What do you think the answer is to your own question?  How much research have you done?  

Look for a text by Salmon and Johnson.  Their text is commonly used as graduate class text and is very helpful.  Since this is a basic question and you seem to have little understanding of it, your best bet is to study it thoroughly yourself.  In the end that will help you the most.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources