×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cost/Value of Solidworks?
2

Cost/Value of Solidworks?

Cost/Value of Solidworks?

(OP)
Hi,

We currently have 4 seats of Solidworks 2005 S.P3.0.
We would like to upgrade to SW2006.
The prices quoted all stipulate a mandatory 1 year subscription and maintainence contract to go with the software upgrade.
As we do not require support, is there any way to just buy the upgrade itself?

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

The subscription support includes the cost of a new version and service packs. It also allows you access to a VARs roll-outs and seminars. Your company is not really saving money by dis-continuing subscription.

cheers

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

(OP)
We have had solidworks since 1998.
We use solidworks classic or base edtion (no photoworks etc.)
We were paying £4000 approx EVERY year, the questions is, for what?

An upgrade that usually has more bugs than fixes,
Support which couldn't solve all of our problems.
Also, with each new version of solidworks the performance of your hardware decreases thus you have to buy faster processors, more RAM, better video cards etc.

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

Welcome to the world of CAD and software... it’s been like this for years and will never change. - Upgrading is part of it. I have the same box for 3 years now and I am still able to use SW07 Sp4.

As for more bugs and fixes... SP0.0 is always a little buggier when it comes out, but as the SP's come they usually get better... it really varies on what you do in your company. Some people that find a show stopping bug and keep them from doing their job, while others may never encounter that bug at all. It varies between people and companies.

If you don't pay for maintenance your having to pay and extra fee just to get the upgrade, so you’re probably spending more money each year by paying this to upgrade. Your better off getting the support and the SP's then not getting them at all. If you upgrade to SW07 and don't get maintenance then your stuck with SP0... and if you don't have a bug that stops you from working entirely, then your not entitled to the SP that could help or fix the problem. If you have a workaround, then that's your fix. We have customers we never hear from, but they get their upgrades every year.

If support could not fix your problems its one of 2 reasons, they are not educated enough to fix them, or the way you use the software is practical for SW… in other words your design intent is wrong and SW does not perform that away. I have seen it a thousand times. Everyone designs difference, but SW has a set way of using Design intent. If you don’t follow this procedure, then your trying to make the software do something it was not intended to do like this. Its not to say it can’t be done, just might be your process perhaps.

Regards,

Scott Baugh, CSWP pc2
www.scottjbaugh.com
"If it's not broke, Don't fix it!"
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

(OP)
The `box' you have had for 3 years now,
I'm guessing it's a high-end workstation, maybe dual xeons, with a high-end video card, and at least 2GB of RAM.

I have P4 3.0 Ghz
2GB 400MHz RAM
128MB ATI FireGL X1 AGP

My PC is used as a server to another 2 SW seats, would this run SW2007?

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

HAHA I wish!

its a single 2.4Ghz with 3GB of RAM, Nvidia Quadro FX 1100... that's about it... its nothing special... in fact its a generic PC it has not brand name on it. We pick the PC up for $600 and just slowly added to it... 3GB of RAM is added along with the VC... and I recently got a DVD burner on it... its nothing special.

Regards,

Scott Baugh, CSWP pc2
www.scottjbaugh.com
"If it's not broke, Don't fix it!"
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

(OP)


Will you be using this PC for SW2008?

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

As of right now yes I will be. I have SW05 through SW08 on this machine right now and its doing fine. It could be better, but I am not crashing...

Regards,

Scott Baugh, CSWP pc2
www.scottjbaugh.com
"If it's not broke, Don't fix it!"
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

I guess your comments pretty much beg the question.  Why do you want to upgrade at all if you do not see a benefit?

As they say, you have to pay to play.  Depending on your organization, the annual maintenance is probably a small overhead expense.

Dan

www.eltronresearch.com

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

I never call support unless there's a software bug and I need to get a repair order in.  Otherwise, I figure I'm simply paying for software updates.  The bottom line is that you need to make the software not only pay for itself, but pay to be worth being used.  I use SW every day, and I get great use out of the PhotoWorks/Animator modules on top of the base software--so I get a bit more use out of the software for a little extra.  As it is, it pays for itself and helps me make money.  (I understand the cost, it comes out of my pocket.)

Jeff Mowry
www.industrialdesignhaus.com
Reason trumps all.  And awe transcends reason.

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

Quote (Kensai):

My PC is used as a server to another 2 SW seats, would this run SW2007?
If you mean as a file storage, that's not a good idea for any version ... or any software for that matter. Have a separate PC for the server or your machine will be constantly taking a performance hit whenever the other stations access yours.
How is your PC acting as the server?

cheers

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

I think most software companies try to convince you that you need to "upgrade" on a regular basis. If they didn't do this, they'd go out of business.

I sometimes think somewhat useless features are created towards this end. The next thing you know, you're working with bloated software.

Ken

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

If I am not mistaken most VARs that are worth anything will give you the Service Packs for year dated software if you decide not to purchase the service contract.....So that would mean the service agreement is so you can continue to upgrade to the newest release.  I would take a look at what Adobe's service agreement is....we end up paying a few dollars off of MSRP when we want to upgrade.  I personally think SWx service agreement is a bargin.

Heckler   americanflag
Sr. Mechanical Engineer
SWx 2007 SP 4.0 & Pro/E 2001

      o
  _`\(,_
(_)/ (_)

"Avoid the base hypocrisy of condemning in one man what you pass over in silence when committed by another." -- Theodor

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

Not all software upgrades are upgrades to the use interface.  Increasingly, software is being upgraded to leverage the fast-paced hardware market.  Although upgrades (both hardware and software) are the market trend, you really need to crunch the numbers on an individual basis.  Do a ROI calculation, and maybe the answer to your dilemma will fall out.

Although you have to admit there is a coolness factor, guys.  Nobody wants to admit that they still use their Amiga to play Pitfall at home, right?  Is it just me?

Dan

www.eltronresearch.com

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

There's been some changes made regarding service packs and upgrades:
• Service packs will be installation specific.

• Service packs cannot be installed on installations that are not current with Subscription Service.

• Product upgrades will be available only to active subscription customers.

Jeff Mirisola, CSWP
http://designsmarter.typepad.com/jeffs_blog

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

(OP)
My PC is used as file storage for the other 2 SW seats.
If you never call your VAR for support can you justify the support cost?
Would you pay bill gates a yearly subscription fee after you bought one of his operating systems?
I was a lot happier with Solidworks when it wasn't trying to be autocad.

We shall continue to use SW2005 without subscription, as you say, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Thanks for the input guys.

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

Its going to suck if you have someone using a later version then SW05... because you should know its not backwards compatiable... then you will be forced to upgrade if you want the Tree history.

There are a lot of people that justify the cost with calling support, unless they find a bug to turn in. If you guys are one of companies that think calling in to help SW find its own bugs is nonsense, then you can't complain about the bugs in the software IMO. But if you are proactive and help SW to better serve you then more power to you... Its respectable. But at the same time to each his own.

If I had to pay windows for windows support and upgrades... No questions asked, I would pay. The SP that they release fix known issues and crashing, etc... Then if there was a problem I would call and tell them the problem. Its a good thing their system is not set up like that.

SW was never trying to be ACAD. SW is still SW and its a 3D modeler ACAD is a 2D drawing package period. Just because it added a few features to attract ACAD users is no big deal... just don't use those features, there are plenty of of commands that have nothing to do with ACAD. However some of the features they added like Blocks and layers can be utilized well.

Of course to me that's kind of like saying... I was a lot happier with SW when it wasn't trying to be Pro-E. SW is a form of Pro-E, just modified to be a MCAD software and easier to use, along with being supported on a Windows OS. I have been using SW since it came out in 95-96. So I am vet to this software. There is nothing added to SW that makes it anything but SW. There are items added to make your life easier and those that came from ACAD. If you don't like something they added, don't use unless you have too. No need to complain about it, its not going away.

Regards,

Scott Baugh, CSWP pc2
www.scottjbaugh.com
"If it's not broke, Don't fix it!"
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

"My PC is used as file storage for the other 2 SW seats."
As I said before ... bad idea. That is probably part the cause of any performance problems.

"If you never call your VAR for support can you justify the support cost?"
To stay up to date with the latest additions to SW. If you change from SW05 to SW10 it will be like learning a completely new software. Better to learn the program in smaller steps and make use of the new stuff as you go.

"Would you pay bill gates a yearly subscription fee after you bought one of his operating systems?"
If Windows was adding capabilities which made me more productive or functions which made designing easier, (like SW is) then without reservation ... YES.

[i]"I was a lot happier with Solidworks when it wasn't trying to be autocad."[i]
I think Scott covered this very well. It's not trying to be ACAD, (there is no comparison in capabilities) but it is trying to make the transition to MCAD easier for ACAD users. Sometimes it works (blocks, layers, etc) sometimes it doesn't (2D emulator).

If you are that unhappy with SW, there are plenty of other choices. Just remember though, the grass only looks greener from this side.

cheers

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

Quote:

"If you never call your VAR for support can you justify the support cost?"
To stay up to date with the latest additions to SW. If you change from SW05 to SW10 it will be like learning a completely new software. Better to learn the program in smaller steps and make use of the new stuff as you go.

But what if SWx2005 still met all your needs what would be the purpose to upgrade?  Because upgrading brings with it a host of other needed hardware upgrades.  One thing that's stinging us right now is the need for more RAM.  SWx2005 still meets all our needs.  Albeit, the new features in 2007 make sense.

Just trying to look at it from another angle.  I still use Pro/E 2001 even though I have a service contract to upgrade to WildFire.....

Heckler   americanflag
Sr. Mechanical Engineer
SWx 2007 SP 4.0 & Pro/E 2001

      o
  _`\(,_
(_)/ (_)

"Avoid the base hypocrisy of condemning in one man what you pass over in silence when committed by another." -- Theodor

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

my two cents I agree that most upgrades with SW or any other software are to push new hardware.  Where I work some cleints send SW files and if our version is not what they have or higher then we would not be able to open it you.  so at least in our casewe do need the upgrades  and I personally use a very low end computer it could run better but at the end of the day it gets the job done. so upgrades are defiately a good idea if you don't see yourself sharing SW files then you don't have to worry about compatability issues then you may get away with using an older version

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

Heckler ... If SW2005 is suitable for the type of product; the processes of the customers and manufacturers involved; and the people who use it, then there would be no present need to change.

However;

From a company perspective, what would happen when one of those users need to be replaced, or there is a need to employ more users? Imagine, in several years time trying to find someone who would be capable and willing to revert to an older more limited version. Could you, in your current position, be as productive using SW98 with a (at that time) top of the line Pentium running Win98 with a whopping 48MB RAM) smile as you are with SW07 on a basic P4? I couldn't, and I would not join a company that would even consider asking me to.

... and;

From an employee perspective, what would happen if one of those users wanted to change jobs? Being knowledgeable in later versions might very well be the asset needed to land a job. As an employee I push for upgrades to keep me up to date.

It has to be much easier to create annual budgets for yearly upgrades/updates to software and hardware, than to have to arrange an appropriation budget for total replacement every decade or so.

cheers

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

How much of a sting is adding more RAM?  Kind of along the line of what CBL was pointing out - if a company is having trouble spending $100-$200 to add necessary memory, then that would be the first sign that all is not right there and I would not consider it a desireable place of employment.  Why companies don't see that CAD software and computer hardware is a tool of the job is beyond me.  My manager has put it very well when he likens it to a someone in the shop trying to use a tiny hammer to put together big parts.  There is nothing inherently better about a big hammer - its used to put together certain sized parts.  Conversely for the small hammer.  And so it is with computer hardware.  The right tool needs to be selected for the job.  For some reason people get upset about certain users in a company having "high powered" computers, when it is in fact the tool most pertinent to get their job done.  As far as software upgrades - it seems to be a pay me now or pay me later type of situation.  For many of the reasons stated above, I have chosen to stay current with SolidWorks and pay the subscription money.  We install new versions of the software on a yearly basis and I conduct a quick 2 hour update class for users.  I point them to the What's New document, provide books, and have purcahsed i get it training in the last year.  Having motivated users that are happy about doing their job with good software and proper support is cost efficient in the long run in my opinion.

Pete

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

The cost to benefit ratio of upgrading software and hardware can be simple math. If your company depends on improved productivity from the engineering department spending 5% to 10% of wages and benefits on hardware and software can provide a 1 year payback.
Your company is loosing money by having your workstation as the server. If 3 people are actively working you need a dedicated server with Gigabit Ethernet and 3 new workstations with XP, Gigabit Ethernet and SW2008. This should have a few months pay back if work is actually being done.
We are a small company and replace the primary workstation every 3 years maximum. Back when a 200 Mhz Pentium was the fastest PC available I purchased a DEC Alpha for $15,000.00 for SolidWorks 97 and it had a 6 month payback. This machine was donated to a college when it was 18 months old.

Ed Danzer
www.danzcoinc.com
www.dehyds.com

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

(OP)
Thanks for the setup info.
Just one thing, when we stored our SW files on a server, we were receiving the message `failed to save'.
We tried many things to resolve this to no avail.
We called in our VAR, they sent out network `experts', they could not provide a network solution. The last thing the VAR suggested was `keeping your files locally on your own PC' this worked, have not had one `failed to save' problem since.
 I wasn't impressed by the VAR at all. This is a workaround not a solution.

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

Kensai,

The "failed to save" message has been discussed numerous times.  I don't recall ever hearing a definitive solution, but a faulty network has always been a primary suspect.

You're correct - saving files locally is a workaround, and a poor one at that.  I'd push on your VAR or look for a new one.

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

You want to treat the server as a network attached hard drive. We have used a network attached hard drive for several years very successfully. Today it is less expensive to buy a server than a network attached hard drive with raid and 10/100/1000 Ethernet . As soon as we complete a couple of projects we will be upgrading to Gigabit Ethernet to speed up file loading times.

Ed Danzer
www.danzcoinc.com
www.dehyds.com

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

The "failed to save" error is a transient issue. It's well known, but you can't attribute it to any one thing and trying to capture it via SolidWorks Rx has proven difficult as it isn't easily repeatable, or at least hasn't been. The vast majority believe it is a network communication error.
As dgownas stated, saving locally is a poor work-around, but I don't think pushing on your VAR will get you anywhere. I think that with the amount of data companies push through their networks, the potential for packet loss on large files is great, which makes it a hardware problem, not a software problem. I'm curious if other MCAD packages have the same problems.

Jeff Mirisola, CSWP
http://designsmarter.typepad.com/jeffs_blog

RE: Cost/Value of Solidworks?

I have not seen this happen with NX, even with huge file sizes.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources