×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Roof Live Load Reduction

Roof Live Load Reduction

Roof Live Load Reduction

(OP)
When should the roof live load be non reducible?  It is reducible per IBC 2003 and 2006 for structural elements  with tributary area over 200 sf.  I see no reference to when a structures roof live load should not be reducible if the tributary area is over 200 SF.

Thanks for any help.

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

I think there is a limit of live load above which you are not allowed to reduce live load effect.  It is probably 80 psf?

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

You cannot reduce live loads of 100 psf or greater.

Technically a live load, although the code might term and deal with it separately, snow loads should not be able to be reduced either since since the load is uniform when it falls - it falls on the whole roof, not just part of it, and probably drifts too.  Hence no supported area reduction for structural framing members.   

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

mike-
I would always consider snow as a roof load regardless of whether it is a deck or whatever else it may be.  Roof loads are not reducible per code, correct?

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

In general, yes.  However, a waterproof deck is technically a "roof" over the unit below.  Technically, at 40 psf LL, that is area reduceable, although the structural members probably will never have enough contributory area for the reduction to be utilized.

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

the building codes allow for a roof live load reduction for tributary area and roof slope.  The equation in the IBC is Lr=LoR1R2.  R1 is for tributary area above 200 sq. ft.  R2 is a reduction factor for roof slope above 4:12.  Snow load is different than roof live load.  I live in a municipality that does not allow any roof live load reduction.  20 psf no matter the tributary area or roof slope.

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

I agree with archeng59 per IBC snow load is reducible and live load is not.

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

fasboater,
I think archeng59 is saying that roof live load can be reduced.

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

My mistake, I was thinking general live load not roof live load. Roof live load Lr is reducible.

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

Professionally, I would never reduce a roof snow load for my above reasons stated, even if it is allowable.

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

Steel deck roofs are non-reducible.

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

Where does it say that steel deck roofs are non-reducible?

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

If you read the code carefully, it states that only the loads stated in the Live Load Table are reducible.  neither minimum roof live load, paritition loads, nor snow loads are listed in that table, so by the letter of the code, they are not reducible.  Please note that yes, i did say partition loads are live loads.  check the code.

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

Roof live loads are reducible as long as you meet all of the appropriate criteria in section 1607.11.2 of the IBC.

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

VIPE,

I agree with you that by a strict reading of the code only live loads in the table are reducible.  It is not, however, the intent of the code to dissallow the reduction of the partition live load.  I got a code clarification opinion from ICC which stated that partition live loads were indeed reducible.   

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

archeng59.....section 1607.11.2 of the IBC

Is that from the 2006 IBC? Can you attach a copy of that, Please?
Thanks

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

IBC 1607.11.2: Reduction in roof live loads.
The minimum uniformly distributed roof live loads, Lo, in Table 1607.1 are permitted to be reduced according to the following provisions.


1607.5 Partition loads. In office buildings and in other buildings where partition locations are subject to change, provisions for partition weight shall be made, whether or not partitions are shown on the construction documents, unless the specified live load exceeds 80 psf. The partition load shall not be less than a uniformly distributed live load of 15 psf.

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

Willis V you commented on my previous thread.

All above, I started a thread on this very subject re partition loads, considered Live in ASCE-7.  My question was the interpretation of ...'In office buildings and in other buildings where partitions are subject to change ...'.  My question was would you consider residential apartment buildings and hotels to be buildings where the partitions are subject to change? and therefore require a minimum partition allowance of 15psf?  For seismic the effective weight must include 10psf where a partition allowance is used.  Have a hot one going on with a local building official on this one so any comments, experience or opinions would be appreciated.  My opinion in these types of buildings (residential apartments and hotels) the probability of moving partitions or unknown partitions, as compared to an office building is zero, fire separations between suites, especially when the occupancy live load is 40 psf residential vs 50 psf of an office which will dictate an future use of the building at the end of the day.  Looking for some input here.  Has a huge seismic and foundation implications.
Don't know how to reference this previous thread so I'll bring it back up as it stopped after WillisV's reply

RE: Roof Live Load Reduction

TVL76, I cannot post a copy of the code without violating the copyright laws.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources