×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Question for Colorado Engineers: Deck

Question for Colorado Engineers: Deck

Question for Colorado Engineers: Deck

(OP)
Most of our clients are up in the mountain and usually  we have a new construction or large remodel.  We just now have more and more clients in the Denver metro area.  When I look at the building department of vairous counties, they all have 8" min concrete pier with 36" into the soil foundation without any isolated footing(they call it caisson for some reason).  Usually on our projects we always use 2x2 footing underneath the sonatube.  Shall I start designing the decks in denver metro area to bear on the area of the pier only?  Usually soil report suggests to use minimum 2x2 isolated footing.  Is it possible to do decks without soil report?  Do you do this 3ft sonatube without footing?

Never, but never question engineer's judgement

RE: Question for Colorado Engineers: Deck

The detail of a small drilled pier is for the 'normal expansive soils' found in great abundance along the Front Range.

In the Grand Junction Area and much of the mountains, I have found extreme conditions. Either:

Expansive clays/Stiff or Firm Soils or Rock. Allowable bearing is fairly high, minimum bearing may or may not be required and only a minimum foundation is required. The 36" length is for frost protection and to provide resistance to tipping.

Very soft, compressible soils which require often requires a pad and column, as you have described. Actually, a small pier can be quite effective for the (normally) small loads associated with decks even when soft soils are encountered. The danger can be with wind uplift. If expansive soils are not the issue, the 2 foundation types may be interchangible.

RE: Question for Colorado Engineers: Deck

(OP)
I thought the term drilled pier usually go all the way to bed rock and it is usually 20ft long?  So you only design the bearing if it is 3 ft long?  No skin friction etc.?

Never, but never question engineer's judgement

RE: Question for Colorado Engineers: Deck

You are stuck on what is common in the Denver area.
The 20 ft long pier is a common minimum length in the Denver area, when dealing with expansive clays typical in the area. The various theories define the upper 'zone of seasonal moisture change' usually 8 to 12 ft and a minimum length below this 'zone' to resist uplift forces, 6 to 10 ft, possibly assisted with shear rings. So 20 ft is a nice round number.

If your look at the real end bearing capacity of the subject soils, considering the depth of embedment, possibly entering in the side friction (if you think the soils will not shrink away from the pier) then these small piers can be quite effective in many soils.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources