×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Flat Plate Design
2

Flat Plate Design

Flat Plate Design

(OP)
I need to design a Rectangular tank that is holding water (sg=1). The tank dimensions are 28ft. long x 14ft. wide x 12ft high. When I analyze the tank wall without any stiffeners, I use a=144 and b=336 the a/b ratio =0.429. Using Roark Case 2d, the a/b ratio starts at 0.5, so my a/b ratio falls off the chart. What do you do in that situation.

Thanks for your help.

RE: Flat Plate Design

a quick FE model would fix that ... make sure you include the hydro-static pressure of the water

RE: Flat Plate Design

add stiffeners

RE: Flat Plate Design

Look in "Design of Weldments" by Omer Blodgett available from Lincoln Welding for the story on how to cypher out  those stiffeners.

RE: Flat Plate Design

Well, a/b =.5 for all practical purposes. You are aware that Roark's results have approximations in them? I haven't got a copy to hand, but whoever worked them out probably assumed perfect simple supports, for example.I suppose the idea of actually working the correct answer out from scratch is too much to ask? Whoever put that table together had to do it after all. Third year at uni, from memory.

Alternatively, extrapolate the curve, see how much difference it makes.

Or use FEA

Realistically, you need a stiffener, or a tie bar.








Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Flat Plate Design

If this is a steel plate, you are going to calculate an unreasonably thick tank without using any stiffeners.  Extrapolate the factor or use the value for 0.5 and see what you get.

RE: Flat Plate Design

You could try ESDU 69018

RE: Flat Plate Design

You can also go to the first site below, under Plates -> Simple bending -> Rectangular -> 3 clamped,1 free -> Hydro.load.
Of course your aim of calculating that flat wall under hydrostatic pressure without stiffeners appears unreasonable...

prex
http://www.xcalcs.com : Online tools for structural design
http://www.megamag.it : Magnetic brakes for fun rides
http://www.levitans.com : Air bearing pads

RE: Flat Plate Design

The problem you will have is the determination of simply supported and fully fixed corner restraints. Your design will have a rotational stiffness somewhere between them. A more elegant solution would be not to have stiffeners on the plates (or even just limited amount), but engineer a double skinned corner attachment which is semi flexible, which would allow a degree of rotation and allows some relief due to membrane effects. Otherwise you end up with a heavy tank due to heavy stiffeners in many places.

RE: Flat Plate Design

Given that this thing is the size of a house I doubt that any malarkey at the corners is going to prevent the top bowing outwards.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Flat Plate Design

Use 'moments & reactions for rectangular plates' with three walls fixed & top edge free with a triangular water load.
Maximum moments are: -
* Top edge at side wall - horizontal - tension inside
* Centre of wall top edge - horizontal - tension outside
* Bottom centre of wall - vertical - tension inside
Coefficients for these three cases are: -
* 0.0715
* 0.0263
* 0.0984
Moment = coeffic x pressure x depth**2
Metric units with depth 3.7 m.
pressure = gamma x depth = 9.8 x 3.7 = 36.3 kN/m**2
moment = 0.0984 x 36.3 x 3.7**2 = 48.9 kNm
stress = M/Z
For a fy of 300 MPa & a stress of 2/3 fy = 200 MPa
t = 38 mm
That's 1.5 inches (in the old money).

As mechengdude said "use stiffeners".

Start with a square grid of stiffeners which is obvious for a uniform load but is very close even with a water (triangular) load.  Near the bottom of the tank, the difference between the load at the top of the panel & the bottom of the panel, is becoming smaller.

Remember, that this analysis assumes that all edges of the plates are rigid (a good starting point & an extreme one).  This concept is not acceptable in the 'real' world.  There are rotations at the corners, the tanks sits on 'an elastic foundation' etc etc.

However, this concept design (rigid edges) is a safe design.  It probably can't be any worse.

If you have access to a FEA model, use this but be very careful of your 'spring constants' (beam on an elastic foundation) that you use of soils or clay or rock etc.

RE: Flat Plate Design

I also should have mentioned, check for horizontal deflection at the top (centre) of the wall.  For a single plate, this may be unacceptable depending on your connections to other structures.

RE: Flat Plate Design

I also meant to mention, the cantilever moment (for an infinitely long wall) at the bottom of the wall (vertical direction) increases as the cube of the water depth (BM = gamma x h cubed/6).  Reduce the water depth from 3.7 m to 3 m, will reduce the moment by nearly 50 %.

RE: Flat Plate Design

One thing to look out for with large, stiffened ducts and tanks with positive pressure is the negative moment issues at the corners.  Your stiffeners must be designed not to  buckle locally if you carry them around the corners - they are in compression in this zone, while in tension out in the middle of the plate.



If you "heard" it on the internet, it's guilty until proven innocent. - DCS

RE: Flat Plate Design

If the top doesn't need to be open (as for dipping large items), then the simplest way to stiffen the top is to run members across the top, even if there's not a full roof.

Otherwise, on the stiffeners, you can work it a lot of different ways.  Vertical stiffeners framing into a large beam at top, a series of box-shaped stiffeners around the sides, etc.  Stiffeners can be inside or out, although outside is preferred.  Stiffeners welded to the plate can be considered as composite sections using part of the plate.  When you get done, it will make you appreciate a circular tank.

RE: Flat Plate Design

Just picking up on JStephen's comment, why does the tank of that size need to be rectangular!

Mark Hutton


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources