×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Locknut vs. Standard Nut & Lockwasher

Locknut vs. Standard Nut & Lockwasher

Locknut vs. Standard Nut & Lockwasher

(OP)
APPLICATION: Automotive (heavy truck); Steering & suspension hardware.

DESCRIPTION: Currently, 2, 7/16-20 threaded drawkeys secure a king pin in a heavy truck axle with standard grade 8 lockwashers and nuts.  

IDEA: Replace each standard lockwasher and nut combination with a grade 8 defromed-thread hex flange locknut.  Basically, the top of the deformed-thread locknut is compressed to an oval shaped locking zone.  The locknuts twist freely on a bolt or stud until they make contact with the locking zone.  Then they expand to an almost circular shape, creating locking compression.  Locknuts are reuseable to a point.

A cost savings could be realized through the proposed hardware replacement.  

To date, not 1 complaint has ever been raised regarding issues surrounding self-loosening of the king pin draw keys with the standard nut and lockwasher combination.  I am attemping to locate literature stating that locknuts provide as good or better "self-loosening" properties than the standard nuts and washers.

QUESTION: Would someone please suggest hardware literature or test data that I may pursue to help me make a cost savings suggestion?

Regards,
Tim Kaiser
VW Kaiser Engineering, Inc.
www.vwkaiser.com

RE: Locknut vs. Standard Nut & Lockwasher

So much more elegantly done than what I was going to say, star for you.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: Locknut vs. Standard Nut & Lockwasher

deadhorse

(I like that emoticon...)

RE: Locknut vs. Standard Nut & Lockwasher

The short answer is that the lock nut is almost certainly less prone to loosening. I have encountered three issues with these types of nuts though:
1. They are not usually reusable (which you touched on). I believe that there is some spec that says lock nuts should be reusable up to 5 times with X% of the original locking torque, but in my experience you will only get 1 installation.
2. The clamp load will be difficult to control. Any slight variation in the nuts will result in a large change in clamp load. And obviously you will have to come up with a new torque spec (and change all the related documentation)
3. From a production stand point this type of lock nut is generally no better than a lock washer/nut combination. Instead of grabbing and installing two pieces of hardware now they have to be cognisant of putting the nut on correctly. You can eliminate this problem by using the nuts that are pinched in the middle instead.

ISZ

RE: Locknut vs. Standard Nut & Lockwasher

IceStationZebra- OP says Flange nuts, kinda have to be the right way anyway. Not that production wont put them on upside down, production is where that saying about foolproof came from.

Nick
I love materials science!

RE: Locknut vs. Standard Nut & Lockwasher

Sorry, missed that.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources