×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Allowable beam rotation

Allowable beam rotation

Allowable beam rotation

(OP)
Can anyone provide some guidance on allowable rotations of W-sections for servicability considerations?

I have an architecturally finished wall section being supported by the W-sections. However, the wall is two feet off the centerline of the beam, and is creating a substantial torsional moment. The wall finish is sensitive to deformation and the beams cannot be laterally braced.

Any guidance on this issue would be greatly appreciated.

RE: Allowable beam rotation

Need more information. Is the wall parallel to the beams, what is it supported by? Why is the beam in torsion, is there a cantilever?

RE: Allowable beam rotation

Perhaps more description might help us!

RE: Allowable beam rotation

(OP)
The wall is running parallel to the beam. The wall is supported  by a canilever system attached to the top flange of the W-section. The distance between the centerline of the beam and the center of mass of the wall/wall support system is two feet.

RE: Allowable beam rotation

What type of wall? What type of deck? Weight of the wall on the cantilever? If you can't kick back to the deck or another beam can you add framing to kick back to?

RE: Allowable beam rotation

(OP)
The structure is a large four story atrium-like entrance, but with minimal windows. There is no decking, ect. to tie it back to and no additional framing can be added. The cantilever-wall system is to be cold form shapes with an architectural finish on the cold-form wall frame. The finish weighs 18 psf on beam spacings of ten feet. Beam spans are twenty feet and column/wall placements cannot be altered due to the retrofit nature of the project.

RE: Allowable beam rotation

Do you HAVE to use a WF?  I would try to use an HSS.

RE: Allowable beam rotation

I would either use an HSS or reinforce the WF with side plates to make a closed section (tube).

RE: Allowable beam rotation

I agree that a tube would be a better solution here.

But, back to your original question--the serviceability issue is with items ATTACHED to the beam, and not the beam itself.  For example, what does the beam rotation do to the wall system?  A small rotation in the beam could result in a large deflection in the wall system.  The wall system will rotate with the beam, where it is attached to the beam.

DaveAtkins

RE: Allowable beam rotation

(OP)
Right. I was informed that the wall finish would be very rigid, but could crack due to any substantial deformations.
I have taken care of local deflections on the wall.
I was worried about the beam rotations because any differential in rotation from beam to beam could cause deformations. I had hoped to counteract this by limiting beam sizes, but I am limited with how large a beam I can use.

RE: Allowable beam rotation

(OP)
I actually meant to write limiting beam rotations, not limiting beam sizes.

RE: Allowable beam rotation

I am still not 100% sure how the two beams fit in, are the outriggers propped cantilevers(i.e a cantilever with a backspan)?

Anyhow with this limited understanding in mind I have two comments:

1. If you are concerned about the rotation of the beam then the beam probably doesnt work strength wise anyhow. Double check your numbers.

2. how are the beams restrained at the ends against torsion?

In this type of situation, I would usually weld an angle to the opposite side from the cantilever to take out the torsion from the cantilever. If the beam is not restrained against torsion at the ends then it will rotate a little to the point that there is negligible torsion in the beam and the full moment goes into the backspan.

Also be aware that this type of detail will amplify the effective load on the nearest beam.

As you have correctly realised, it is the deflection of the line of support directly under the wall that matters. Calculate the maximum allowable deflection at this point as if this line was a beam, then compare your actual deflection from combined cantilever, beam and rotation deflection to this number.

csd

RE: Allowable beam rotation

If you use HSS, can you bolt it down some how to eliminate rotation?

RE: Allowable beam rotation

If you cannot add purlins to laterally brace the beam, why not upset the beam in question and create a moment connection at the juncture of the steel beams that support the wall?  These beams would then serve to help take out the torsion imparted to the beam in question.  Having the beams the same size at the intersection would help too.

Is this possible?

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Allowable beam rotation

I would calculate the amount of deflection the wall could tolerate if it were supported by a beam under its center.  Use this to calculate the amount of rotation in the beam that would cause this maximum deflection.

I would suggest something like Mr. McCann.  Instead of a cantilever hanging off of one side of the beam, provide beams on the opposite side of the main support to turn the cantilever beams into overhangs.  If you can't have those bear on the supporting wide flange, then frame them into the wide flange each side and provide a continuous splice connection.

RE: Allowable beam rotation

Yes - WF sections have very little stiffness rotationally.

Very little.

I think they have very little stiffness....

(hint hint)  Do what these excellent posters say above and use an HSS.  If your wall is brittle as you say, you'll regret using a WF.

RE: Allowable beam rotation

(OP)
I would like to thank everyone for their advice and comments. You guys have been very helpful.

We obtained allowable local deflections from the architect and from there determined allowable rotations of the W-shape.

W-shapes were used because the owner wished that the new additional structural system (which would be partially exposed) match the existing system (W-shapes).

We had beam to column moment connections, but were still getting minor (<2degree) rotations at mid-span which were still above the allowable rotation determined above. This was counter-acted by selecting the appropriate (if slightly larger) shape and adding stiffeners at quarterpoints along the beam.

RE: Allowable beam rotation

What kind of stiffeners?

RE: Allowable beam rotation

The stiffeners will just go along for the ride.  You have been given good advice that you MUST use a closed section, and if you do not, nobody is going to be happy with the end result.

RE: Allowable beam rotation

hokie66 said it.  The stiffeners will not help you.  Why would they?  Unless the beam is bolted to some sort of support at the stiffener locations, they aren't going to do much.  

RE: Allowable beam rotation

Maybe he has designed the stiffeners to restrain warping.

RE: Allowable beam rotation

I trust that you have included the beam curvature defection in the total deflection.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources