×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

overdefined mates w/flexible subassemblies

overdefined mates w/flexible subassemblies

overdefined mates w/flexible subassemblies

(OP)
Hi guys. Check out this pic:

http://s92.photobucket.com/albums/l7/kylewilcox/trailer.jpg

What you see is a door on hinges, supported by two cylinders. The cylinders are (right now) made out of flexible subassemblies with a limitdistance mate for extension. With one cylinder it works fine... and with two cylinders it works fine (able to drag door open/shut with the cylinders extending/retracting quite nicely)... but with two, SW thinks it's overdefined and fills the feature tree with errors.

this is no big deal as I can do all the geo design with just one side, and I'm betting if I put the raw cylinder parts into the top level assembly it would work (by killing off those god-awful flexible subassy's), but for academics, I'm just curious how other people might assemble something like this?

apologies if harder searching would have given me some solutions...

-Kyle

RE: overdefined mates w/flexible subassemblies

Try creating a second configuration of the cylinder and kill off the limit distance mate in it. Switch one of your cylinders in the assembly to this second config and give that a try.

Jeff Mirisola, CSWP
http://designsmarter.typepad.com/jeffs_blog

RE: overdefined mates w/flexible subassemblies

(OP)
Good thinking - Works like a charm! I tried a second config but didn't think of suppressing the overdefining mate in one of them (when I word it that way, it seems way too obvious... smack forehead). Thanks!

RE: overdefined mates w/flexible subassemblies

Kyle,

This has been a thorn in my side for a long time now, since we use pairs of hydraulic cylinders all the time.  I still haven't found a solution.  I've tried various combinations of configurations, mate scenarios, etc. all to no avail.  I also have problems with the cylinders "flipping" end to end for no apparent reason.

- Chris

Chris C. Mechanical Engineer
SW07x64 SP4.0
Dell 490, Xeon Dual Core, 8GB ram
Nvidia Quadro FX3500

RE: overdefined mates w/flexible subassemblies

I've always had trouble with Limit Mates.

Whenever I create a subassembly of a cylinder, I make three configurations:

1) Fully Extended
2) Fully Retracted
3) Flexible

In your case, you could have one cylinder drive the position of the door by using the "extended" or "retracted" configuration. The second cylinder can just always be kept on the "flexible" configuration and *should* just follow the lead of the first cylinder. This usually works pretty good for me.

RE: overdefined mates w/flexible subassemblies

(OP)
JMirisola's solution works fine for me; one cylinder has a limit mate (which effectively "constrains" that degree of freedom, the other cylinder has its own config with suppressed limit mate (so it doesn't further "constrain" things))

I had some trouble with SW not updating the flexible assemblies which made it seem like it wasn't going to work--I made another cyl config and suppressed the mate, but in the parent assembly the flexible cyl refused to update itself and the mate remained active(probably related to how it says, Flexible Assemblies cannot be edited in-place...) I had to suppress -all- cylinders and unsuppress them to make the assembly reload it and have the mate suppressed in one config.

They work gorgeous now.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources